Wengloski Christine E, Cleary Hayley M D
Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
J Interpers Violence. 2024 Aug 4:8862605241268773. doi: 10.1177/08862605241268773.
Understanding the predictors of stalking victimization, help-seeking behaviors of stalking victims, and their reporting to police can help law enforcement and advocates improve systems and ensure they are accessible and useful to victims. Existing stalking research focuses heavily on campus-based stalking, non-nationally representative populations, and/or dated data collection methods, such as the 2006 National Crime Victimization Survey, Supplemental Victimization Survey (NCVS-SVS), an instrument that has been updated according to current stalking definitions. This study employs the latest 2019 NCVS-SVS to analyze its new stalking screening questions and additional variables. We identified predictors of (a) stalking victimization, (b) help-seeking from victim-serving agencies, (c) help-seeking from personal networks, and (d) reporting to police. Predictors of stalking victimization included younger age, identifying as female, identifying as not heterosexual, household incomes below $50,000, and any college attendance. Victims who knew their offenders (intimate or non-intimate) were more likely than victims of stranger stalking to seek help from victim-serving agencies and personal networks. Younger victims were more likely to seek help from personal networks. None of the variables we examined predicted reporting to police. This study shows the characteristics of stalking victims have stayed consistent over time but highlights an ongoing need for resources for victims of stranger stalking, who may not know about or be able to access stalking services that are offered by intimate partner violence agencies. Future research around stalking victim characteristics should focus on populations that are newly included in national stalking data, such as those who identify as transgender and sexual identity minorities.
了解跟踪骚扰受害者的预测因素、跟踪骚扰受害者的求助行为以及他们向警方报案的情况,有助于执法部门和倡导者改进相关系统,并确保这些系统对受害者来说是可及且有用的。现有的跟踪骚扰研究主要集中在校园跟踪骚扰、缺乏全国代表性的人群以及/或者过时的数据收集方法上,比如2006年全国犯罪受害情况调查、补充受害情况调查(NCVS-SVS),这是一种根据当前跟踪骚扰定义进行了更新的工具。本研究采用最新的2019年NCVS-SVS来分析其新的跟踪骚扰筛查问题和其他变量。我们确定了以下方面的预测因素:(a)跟踪骚扰受害情况、(b)向受害者服务机构求助、(c)向个人社交网络求助以及(d)向警方报案。跟踪骚扰受害情况的预测因素包括年龄较小、女性身份、非异性恋身份、家庭收入低于5万美元以及有过任何大学就读经历。认识犯罪者(亲密或非亲密关系)的受害者比陌生人跟踪骚扰的受害者更有可能向受害者服务机构和个人社交网络求助。较年轻的受害者更有可能向个人社交网络求助。我们所考察的变量中没有一个能预测向警方报案的情况。这项研究表明,跟踪骚扰受害者的特征长期以来保持一致,但突出了一个持续存在的需求,即需要为陌生人跟踪骚扰的受害者提供资源,因为他们可能不了解或无法获得亲密伴侣暴力机构提供的跟踪骚扰服务。未来围绕跟踪骚扰受害者特征的研究应聚焦于新纳入国家跟踪骚扰数据的人群,比如那些认定自己为跨性别者和性取向少数群体的人。