Suppr超能文献

[中成药治疗慢性肺源性心脏病的网状Meta分析]

[Network Meta-analysis of Chinese patent medicines in treatment of chronic pulmonary heart disease].

作者信息

Wu Wen-Jun, Zhang Chi-Dao, Wei Jing-Jing, Li Xue, Peng Guang-Cao, Wang Xin-Lu, Yu Rui, Zhu Ming-Jun

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, the First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Chinese Medicine Zhengzhou 450000, China Henan University of Chinese Medicine Zhengzhou 450000, China.

Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, the First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Chinese Medicine Zhengzhou 450000, China.

出版信息

Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi. 2024 Jul;49(14):3936-3951. doi: 10.19540/j.cnki.cjcmm.20240318.501.

Abstract

Network Meta-analysis was performed to compare the efficacy and safety of Chinese patent medicines in treating chronic pulmonary heart disease. CNKI, VIP, Wanfang, SinoMed, PubMed, Web of Science, EMbase, and Cochrane Library were searched for randomized controlled trial(RCT) of treating chronic pulmonary heart disease with Chinese patent medicines with the time interval from inception to December 2023. The Cochrane risk-of-bias tool was used for quality assessment of the included articles. RevMan 5.4 and Stata 17.0 were employed to establish the risk of bias map and perform the network Meta-analysis, respectively. Ultimately, a total of 95 RCTs involving 8 787 cases and 11 different Chinese patent medicines were included. Network Meta-analysis yielded the following results based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve(SUCRA).(1)In terms of cardiac function improves clinical total effective rate, SUCRA the top three were Wenxin Granules + conventional western medicine, Tongxinluo Capsules + conventional western medicine, and Qishen Yiqi Dropping Pills + conventional western medicine.(2)For improving forced expiratory volume in the first se-cond(FEV1), SUCRA the top three were Danting Feixin Granules + conventional western medicine, Tongxinluo Capsules + conventional western medicine, and Bufei Huoxue Capsules + conventional western medicine.(3)Regarding increasing the FEV1/forced vital capacity(FVC%) value, SUCRA the top three were Qili Qiangxin Capsules + conventional western medicine, Shexiang Baoxin Pills + conventional western medicine, and Qishen Yiqi Dropping Pills + conventional western medicine.(4)In terms of increasing the partial pressure of oxygen(PaO_2), SUCRA the top three were Qili Qiangxin Capsules + conventional western medicine, Qishen Yiqi Dropping Pills + conventional western medicine, and Shexiang Baoxin Pills + conventional western medicine.(5)In terms of reducing the partial pressure of carbon dioxide(PaCO_2), SUCRA the top three were Tongxinluo Capsules + conventional western medicine, Qishen Yiqi Dropping Pills + conventional western medicine, and Shexiang Baoxin Pills + conventional western medicine.(6)In terms of increasing left ventricular ejection fraction(LVEF), SUCRA the top three were Bufei Huoxue Capsules + conventional western medicine, Qishen Yiqi Dropping Pills + conventional western medicine, and Shexiang Baoxin Pills + conventional western medicine.(7)In terms of decreasing brain natriu-retic peptide(BNP), SUCRA the top three were Compound Danshen Dropping Pills + conventional western medicine, Qili Qiangxin Capsules + conventional western medicine, and Tongxinluo Capsules + conventional western medicine.(8)In terms of improving the hematocrit level, SUCRA the top three were Qishen Yiqi Dropping Pills + conventional western medicine, Compound Danshen Dropping Pills + conventional western medicine, and Tongxinluo Capsules + conventional western medicine. In terms of safety, 26 RCTs reported adverse reactions, which primarily involved the circulatory and digestive systems. The combination of Chinese patent medicines with conventional western medicine has demonstrated enhanced therapeutic effects on chronic pulmonary heart disease. However, due to the varying quality and sample sizes of included studies and the absence of direct comparisons between Chinese patent medicines, the conclusions should be further validated by multicenter studies with larger sample sizes and higher methodological rigor.

摘要

进行网状Meta分析以比较中成药治疗慢性肺源性心脏病的疗效和安全性。检索中国知网、维普、万方、中国生物医学文献数据库、PubMed、Web of Science、EMbase和Cochrane图书馆,查找从建库至2023年12月期间使用中成药治疗慢性肺源性心脏病的随机对照试验(RCT)。采用Cochrane偏倚风险工具对纳入文献进行质量评估。分别使用RevMan 5.4和Stata 17.0绘制偏倚风险图并进行网状Meta分析。最终,共纳入95项RCT,涉及8787例患者和11种不同的中成药。基于累积排序曲线下面积(SUCRA),网状Meta分析得出以下结果。(1)在改善心功能临床总有效率方面,SUCRA排名前三的是稳心颗粒+常规西药、通心络胶囊+常规西药、芪参益气滴丸+常规西药。(2)在改善第一秒用力呼气量(FEV1)方面,SUCRA排名前三的是丹葶肺心颗粒+常规西药、通心络胶囊+常规西药、补肺活血胶囊+常规西药。(3)在提高FEV1/用力肺活量(FVC%)值方面,SUCRA排名前三的是芪苈强心胶囊+常规西药、麝香保心丸+常规西药、芪参益气滴丸+常规西药。(4)在提高氧分压(PaO₂)方面,SUCRA排名前三的是芪苈强心胶囊+常规西药、芪参益气滴丸+常规西药、麝香保心丸+常规西药。(5)在降低二氧化碳分压(PaCO₂)方面,SUCRA排名前三的是通心络胶囊+常规西药、芪参益气滴丸+常规西药、麝香保心丸+常规西药。(6)在提高左心室射血分数(LVEF)方面,SUCRA排名前三的是补肺活血胶囊+常规西药、芪参益气滴丸+常规西药、麝香保心丸+常规西药。(7)在降低脑钠肽(BNP)方面,SUCRA排名前三的是复方丹参滴丸+常规西药、芪苈强心胶囊+常规西药、通心络胶囊+常规西药。(8)在提高血细胞比容水平方面,SUCRA排名前三的是芪参益气滴丸+常规西药、复方丹参滴丸+常规西药、通心络胶囊+常规西药。在安全性方面,26项RCT报告了不良反应,主要涉及循环系统和消化系统。中成药与常规西药联合使用对慢性肺源性心脏病显示出增强的治疗效果。然而,由于纳入研究的质量和样本量各不相同,且中成药之间缺乏直接比较,结论应通过样本量更大、方法学更严谨的多中心研究进一步验证。

相似文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验