• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大西洋中部地区初级保健提供者对临终谈话的障碍和促进因素的看法。

Mid-Atlantic primary care providers' perception of barriers and facilitators to end-of-life conversation.

作者信息

Horning Melanie A, Habermann Barbara

机构信息

Department of Nursing, Towson University, 8000 York Road, Towson, MD 21252, USA.

School of Nursing, Pacific Lutheran University, Tacoma, WA, USA.

出版信息

Palliat Care Soc Pract. 2024 Aug 1;18:26323524241264882. doi: 10.1177/26323524241264882. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1177/26323524241264882
PMID:39099622
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11295217/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Among the chronically ill, end-of-life conversations are often delayed until emergently necessary and the quality of those conversations and subsequent decision-making become compromised by critical illness, uncertainty, and anxiety. Many patients receive treatment that they would have declined if they had a better understanding of benefits and risks. Primary care providers are ideal people to facilitate end-of-life conversations, but these conversations rarely occur in the out-patient setting.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the self-reported experiences of physicians and advanced practice nurses with conversational barriers and facilitators while leading end-of-life discussions in the primary care setting.

DESIGN

A qualitative descriptive study.

METHODS

Six physicians and eight advanced practice nurses participated in singular semi-structured interviews. Results were analyzed using a qualitative descriptive design and content analysis approach to coding.

RESULTS

Reported barriers in descending order included resistance from patients and families, insufficient time, and insufficient understanding of prognosis and associated expectations. Reported facilitators in descending order included established trusting relationship with provider, physical and/or cognitive decline and poor prognosis; and discussion standardization per Medicare guidelines.

CONCLUSION

Recommendations for improving the end-of-life conversational process in the primary care setting include further research regarding end-of-life conversational facilitators within families, the improvement of patient/family education about hospice/palliative care resources and examining the feasibility of longer appointment allotment..

摘要

背景

在慢性病患者中,临终谈话往往会推迟到紧急需要时才进行,而这些谈话的质量以及随后的决策会因危重病、不确定性和焦虑而受到影响。许多患者接受了一些治疗,但如果他们对治疗的益处和风险有更好的了解,就会拒绝这些治疗。初级保健提供者是促进临终谈话的理想人选,但这些谈话在门诊环境中很少发生。

目的

调查在初级保健环境中主导临终讨论时,医生和高级执业护士在谈话障碍和促进因素方面的自我报告经历。

设计

一项定性描述性研究。

方法

6名医生和8名高级执业护士参与了单独的半结构化访谈。使用定性描述性设计和内容分析编码方法对结果进行分析。

结果

报告的障碍按降序排列包括患者和家属的抵触、时间不足以及对预后和相关期望的理解不足。报告的促进因素按降序排列包括与提供者建立的信任关系、身体和/或认知能力下降以及预后不良;以及根据医疗保险指南进行讨论标准化。

结论

改善初级保健环境中临终谈话过程的建议包括进一步研究家庭内部的临终谈话促进因素、改善患者/家属对临终关怀/姑息治疗资源的教育,以及研究延长预约时间的可行性。

相似文献

1
Mid-Atlantic primary care providers' perception of barriers and facilitators to end-of-life conversation.大西洋中部地区初级保健提供者对临终谈话的障碍和促进因素的看法。
Palliat Care Soc Pract. 2024 Aug 1;18:26323524241264882. doi: 10.1177/26323524241264882. eCollection 2024.
2
Thinking ahead about medical treatments in advanced illness: a qualitative study of barriers and enablers in end-of-life care planning with patients and families from ethnically diverse backgrounds.预先思考晚期疾病的医疗治疗:对不同种族背景的终末期患者和家庭进行临终关怀规划的障碍和促进因素的定性研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Jun;11(7):1-135. doi: 10.3310/JVFW4781.
3
Barriers to and Facilitators of End-of-Life Decision Making by Neonatologists and Neonatal Nurses in Neonates: A Qualitative Study.新生儿科医生和新生儿护士在新生儿末期决策方面的障碍和促进因素:一项定性研究。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2020 Mar;59(3):599-608.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.10.007. Epub 2019 Oct 19.
4
Advance care planning conversations in primary care: a quality improvement project using the Serious Illness Care Program.初级保健中的预先护理计划对话:使用严重疾病护理计划进行的质量改进项目。
BMC Palliat Care. 2021 Jul 30;20(1):122. doi: 10.1186/s12904-021-00817-z.
5
Improving shared decision-making around antimicrobial-prescribing during the end-of-life period: a qualitative study of Veterans, their support caregivers and their providers.改善临终阶段抗菌药物处方的共同决策:对退伍军人、其支持护理人员及其医疗服务提供者的定性研究
Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol. 2024 May 17;4(1):e89. doi: 10.1017/ash.2024.61. eCollection 2024.
6
Barriers and facilitators to optimal supportive end-of-life palliative care in long-term care facilities: a qualitative descriptive study of community-based and specialist palliative care physicians' experiences, perceptions and perspectives.长期护理机构中最佳支持性临终姑息治疗的障碍和促进因素:一项基于社区和专科姑息治疗医生的经验、看法和观点的定性描述性研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Aug 5;10(8):e037466. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037466.
7
Building trust and facilitating goals of care conversations: A qualitative study in people with heart failure receiving home hospice care.建立信任和促进关怀目标的对话:在接受家庭临终关怀的心力衰竭患者中的定性研究。
Palliat Med. 2020 Jul;34(7):925-933. doi: 10.1177/0269216320917873. Epub 2020 May 6.
8
Barriers and Facilitators to End-of-Life Care Delivery in ICUs: A Qualitative Study.重症监护病房临终关怀提供的障碍和促进因素:一项定性研究。
Crit Care Med. 2024 Jun 1;52(6):e289-e298. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000006235. Epub 2024 Feb 19.
9
Palliative care experiences of adult cancer patients from ethnocultural groups: a qualitative systematic review protocol.不同种族文化群体成年癌症患者的姑息治疗体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):99-111. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1809.
10
Medical assistance in dying legislation: Hospice palliative care providers' perspectives.安乐死立法:临终关怀护理提供者的观点。
Nurs Ethics. 2022 Feb;29(1):231-244. doi: 10.1177/09697330211012049. Epub 2021 Sep 19.

本文引用的文献

1
Communication Training and Code Status Conversation Patterns Reported by Emergency Clinicians.通讯培训和临床医生报告的代码状态对话模式。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2023 Jan;65(1):58-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2022.10.006. Epub 2022 Oct 17.
2
A practical guide to reflexivity in qualitative research: AMEE Guide No. 149.质性研究中反思性的实用指南:AMEE指南第149号
Med Teach. 2022 Apr 7:1-11. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2022.2057287.
3
Patient Perspectives on Serious Illness Conversations in Primary Care.患者对初级保健中严重疾病谈话的看法。
J Palliat Med. 2022 Jun;25(6):940-944. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2021.0420. Epub 2022 Feb 21.
4
Practice Billing for Medicare Advance Care Planning Across the USA.在美国各地实践医疗保险预先医疗照护计划计费。
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Nov;37(15):3869-3876. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07404-9. Epub 2022 Jan 26.
5
Is Primary Care Physician Involvement Associated with Earlier Advance Care Planning?: A Study of Patients in an Academic Primary Care Setting.初级保健医生的参与是否与更早的预先护理计划有关?:在学术初级保健环境中对患者的一项研究。
J Palliat Med. 2022 Jan;25(1):75-80. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2021.0069.
6
Hope and advance care planning in advanced cancer: Is there a relationship?希望与晚期癌症的预先护理计划:二者之间存在关联吗?
Cancer. 2022 Mar 15;128(6):1339-1345. doi: 10.1002/cncr.34034. Epub 2021 Nov 17.
7
Advance care planning conversations in primary care: a quality improvement project using the Serious Illness Care Program.初级保健中的预先护理计划对话:使用严重疾病护理计划进行的质量改进项目。
BMC Palliat Care. 2021 Jul 30;20(1):122. doi: 10.1186/s12904-021-00817-z.
8
Public Perceptions of Advance Care Planning, Palliative Care, and Hospice: A Scoping Review.公众对预先医疗指示、缓和医疗和临终关怀的认知:范围综述。
J Palliat Med. 2021 Jan;24(1):46-52. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2020.0111. Epub 2020 Jul 2.
9
Exploring patient-reported barriers to advance care planning in family practice.探索家庭医疗中患者对预先医疗指示计划的阻碍因素。
BMC Fam Pract. 2020 May 25;21(1):94. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01167-0.
10
Frequency of discussing and documenting advance care planning in primary care: secondary analysis of a multicenter cross-sectional observational study.初级保健中讨论和记录预先医疗指示的频率:一项多中心横断面观察性研究的二次分析。
BMC Palliat Care. 2020 Mar 17;19(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s12904-020-00543-y.