Mishina Sari, Ito Yuichiro, Lee Takumi, Murofushi Toshiaki, Uetake Yoshiyuki, Akizawa Tadao
Astellas Pharma Inc, Tokyo, Japan.
INTAGE Healthcare Inc, Tokyo, Japan.
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2024 Jul 31;18:1563-1575. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S450464. eCollection 2024.
Several treatment options are available for anemia associated with chronic kidney disease (CKD); however, there remains a lack of awareness of physician and patient preferences regarding these treatments. We aimed to explore physicians' and patients' perceptions and preferences regarding the management of anemia of CKD in Japan.
A web-based survey, including best-worst scaling (BWS), was conducted with physicians who had treated ≥1 patient with anemia of CKD in the preceding year, and with patients with CKD who self-reported a clinical diagnosis of anemia of CKD or low hemoglobin levels. A three-step approach was used comprising cognitive interviews, a pilot survey, and a main survey. The BWS survey results were analyzed using multinomial logit and hierarchical Bayesian models.
The survey was completed by 906 participants: 103 patients (average age 60.6 years; 77.7% male) and 803 physicians (166 nephrologists, 214 cardiologists, 137 diabetologists, and 286 general internists). Almost all (96.0%) physicians surveyed considered anemia of CKD to be an important condition to treat. Hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase (HIF-PH) inhibitors had the highest treatment satisfaction among physicians, whereas patients had the highest satisfaction with both erythropoietin-stimulating agent therapy and HIF-PH inhibitors. Approximately one-third (35.9%) of patients surveyed indicated that they were receiving treatment. When comparing the relative importance of attributes and levels, physicians favored efficacy (particularly improvement in hemoglobin levels), whereas patients favored safety (particularly a lower rate of severe adverse events).
Although a majority of physicians consider treatment of CKD-related anemia important, differences in the perceptions and usage of medications exist between medical specialties. Preferences for the management of anemia of CKD vary between physicians and patients; therefore, patient involvement in treatment decisions may help optimize outcomes.
慢性肾脏病(CKD)相关贫血有多种治疗选择;然而,医生和患者对这些治疗的偏好仍缺乏认识。我们旨在探讨日本医生和患者对CKD贫血管理的看法和偏好。
对前一年治疗过≥1例CKD贫血患者的医生以及自我报告临床诊断为CKD贫血或血红蛋白水平低的CKD患者进行了一项包括最佳-最差尺度法(BWS)的网络调查。采用了包括认知访谈、预调查和主调查的三步法。使用多项逻辑回归和分层贝叶斯模型分析BWS调查结果。
906名参与者完成了调查:103例患者(平均年龄60.6岁;77.7%为男性)和803名医生(166名肾病学家、214名心脏病学家、137名糖尿病学家和286名普通内科医生)。几乎所有(96.0%)接受调查的医生都认为CKD贫血是一种需要治疗的重要病症。缺氧诱导因子脯氨酰羟化酶(HIF-PH)抑制剂在医生中治疗满意度最高,而患者对促红细胞生成素刺激剂疗法和HIF-PH抑制剂的满意度都最高。约三分之一(35.9%)接受调查的患者表示他们正在接受治疗。在比较属性和水平的相对重要性时,医生更看重疗效(特别是血红蛋白水平的改善),而患者更看重安全性(特别是严重不良事件发生率较低)。
虽然大多数医生认为治疗CKD相关贫血很重要,但不同医学专科之间在药物认知和使用方面存在差异。医生和患者对CKD贫血管理的偏好各不相同;因此,患者参与治疗决策可能有助于优化治疗结果。