• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

出院时接受心律监测的患者经导管主动脉瓣置换术后30天的重度主动脉瓣阻塞

Thirty-Day High-Grade Aortic Valve Block Post-Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients Discharged on Heart Rhythm Monitor.

作者信息

Alabdaljabar Mohamad S, Elhadi Mohamed, Gulati Rajiv, Rihal Charanjit S, Friedman Paul A, Cha Yong-Mei, Eleid Mackram F

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.

出版信息

Struct Heart. 2024 May 22;8(4):100317. doi: 10.1016/j.shj.2024.100317. eCollection 2024 Jul.

DOI:10.1016/j.shj.2024.100317
PMID:39100584
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11294892/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Conduction disease is an important and common complication post-transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Previously, we developed a conduction disease risk stratification and management protocol post-TAVR. This study aims to evaluate high-grade aortic valve block (HAVB) incidence and risk factors in a large cohort undergoing ambulatory cardiac monitoring post-TAVR according to conduction risk grouping.

METHODS

This single-center, retrospective study evaluated all patients discharged on ambulatory cardiac monitoring between 2016 and 2021 and stratified them into 3 groups based on electrocardiogram predictors of HAVB risk (group 1 [low], group 2 [intermediate], and group 3 [high]). HAVB was defined as ≥2 consecutive nonconducted P waves in sinus rhythm or bradycardia <50 beats/minute with a fixed rate for atrial fibrillation/flutter. Descriptive statistics were used to show the incidence and timeline, while logistic regression was utilized to evaluate predictors of HAVB.

RESULTS

Five hundred twenty-eight patients were included (median age 80 years [74-85]; 43.8% female). Forty-one patients (7.8%) developed HAVB during ambulatory monitoring (68% were asymptomatic). Over a median follow-up of 2 years (1.3-2.7), the overall mortality rate was 15.0% (30-day mortality rate of 0.57%, n = 3). Risk factors for HAVB were male sex (odds ratio [OR] = 2.46, = 0.02, 95% CI = 1.21-5.43), baseline right bundle branch block (OR = 2.80, = 0.01, 95% CI = 1.17-6.19), and post-TAVR QRS >150 ​ms (OR = 2.16, = 0.03, 95% CI = 1.01-4.40). The negative predictive value for patients in groups 1 and 2 for 30-day HAVB was 95.0 and 93.8%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of 30-day HAVB post-TAVR on ambulatory monitoring post-TAVR varies according to post-TAVR electrocardiogram findings, and a 3-group algorithm effectively identifies groups with a low negative predictive value for HAVB.

摘要

背景

传导疾病是经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)后一种重要且常见的并发症。此前,我们制定了TAVR后传导疾病风险分层及管理方案。本研究旨在根据传导风险分组,评估一大群接受TAVR后动态心脏监测患者的高度房室传导阻滞(HAVB)发生率及危险因素。

方法

这项单中心回顾性研究评估了2016年至2021年间所有出院后接受动态心脏监测的患者,并根据HAVB风险的心电图预测指标将他们分为3组(1组[低风险]、2组[中风险]和3组[高风险])。HAVB定义为窦性心律时连续≥2个未下传的P波,或房颤/房扑时心率固定且心动过缓<50次/分钟。采用描述性统计来显示发生率和时间线,同时利用逻辑回归评估HAVB的预测因素。

结果

纳入528例患者(中位年龄80岁[74 - 85岁];43.8%为女性)。41例患者(7.8%)在动态监测期间发生HAVB(68%无症状)。中位随访2年(1.3 - 2.7年),总死亡率为15.0%(30天死亡率为0.57%,n = 3)。HAVB的危险因素为男性(比值比[OR]=2.46,P = 0.02,95%置信区间[CI]=1.21 - 5.43)、基线右束支传导阻滞(OR = 2.80,P = 0.01,95% CI = 1.17 - 6.19)以及TAVR后QRS>150毫秒(OR = 2.16,P = 0.03,95% CI = 1.01 - 4.40)。1组和2组患者30天HAVB的阴性预测值分别为95.0%和93.8%。

结论

TAVR后动态监测时30天HAVB的风险根据TAVR后的心电图表现而异,并且一种三组算法能有效识别HAVB阴性预测值较低的组。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c004/11294892/1386156926d7/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c004/11294892/b67e0a22eca7/ga1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c004/11294892/8910577ef248/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c004/11294892/1386156926d7/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c004/11294892/b67e0a22eca7/ga1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c004/11294892/8910577ef248/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c004/11294892/1386156926d7/gr2.jpg

相似文献

1
Thirty-Day High-Grade Aortic Valve Block Post-Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients Discharged on Heart Rhythm Monitor.出院时接受心律监测的患者经导管主动脉瓣置换术后30天的重度主动脉瓣阻塞
Struct Heart. 2024 May 22;8(4):100317. doi: 10.1016/j.shj.2024.100317. eCollection 2024 Jul.
2
Temporal Incidence and Predictors of High-Grade Atrioventricular Block After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后高度房室传导阻滞的时间发生率及预测因素。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 May 18;10(10):e020033. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.020033. Epub 2021 May 7.
3
Arrhythmic Burden as Determined by Ambulatory Continuous Cardiac Monitoring in Patients With New-Onset Persistent Left Bundle Branch Block Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: The MARE Study.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后新发持续性左束支传导阻滞患者的动态连续心脏监测的心律失常负担:MARE 研究。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Aug 13;11(15):1495-1505. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.04.016. Epub 2018 Jul 18.
4
Smartwatch-Detected Arrhythmias in Patients After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR): Analysis of the SMART TAVR Trial.经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)后智能手表检测到的心律失常:SMART TAVR 试验分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Jul 19;26:e41843. doi: 10.2196/41843.
5
Ambulatory Electrocardiographic Monitoring Following Minimalist Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后的门诊心电图监测。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Dec 27;14(24):2711-2722. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.08.039.
6
Late arrhythmias in patients with new-onset persistent left bundle branch block after transcatheter aortic valve replacement using a balloon-expandable valve.经皮球囊扩张式主动脉瓣置换术后新发持续性左束支传导阻滞患者的迟发性心律失常。
Heart Rhythm. 2021 Oct;18(10):1733-1740. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2021.05.031. Epub 2021 May 31.
7
Intraprocedural high-degree atrioventricular block or complete heart block in transcatheter aortic valve replacement recipients with no prior intraventricular conduction disturbances.经导管主动脉瓣置换术患者术中出现高度房室传导阻滞或完全性心脏阻滞,且术前无室内传导障碍。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Apr 1;95(5):982-990. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28323. Epub 2019 Apr 29.
8
Prediction of conduction disturbances in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术患者传导障碍的预测。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2023 May;112(5):677-690. doi: 10.1007/s00392-023-02160-0. Epub 2023 Jan 21.
9
Immediate Post-Procedural 12-Lead Electrocardiography as Predictor of Late Conduction Defects After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.即刻经胸 12 导联心电图在预测经导管主动脉瓣置换术后迟发性传导障碍中的作用。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Aug 13;11(15):1509-1518. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.04.011.
10
Bedside Electrophysiological Study Using a Temporary Pacemaker May Predict Recurrence of Atrioventricular Block After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.使用临时起搏器进行床旁电生理研究可能预测经导管主动脉瓣置换术后房室传导阻滞的复发。
Int Heart J. 2021 Sep 30;62(5):1012-1018. doi: 10.1536/ihj.21-145. Epub 2021 Sep 17.

本文引用的文献

1
Risk Factors, Management, and Avoidance of Conduction System Disease after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后传导系统疾病的危险因素、管理及预防
J Clin Med. 2023 Jun 30;12(13):4405. doi: 10.3390/jcm12134405.
2
Temporal Incidence and Predictors of High-Grade Atrioventricular Block After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后高度房室传导阻滞的时间发生率及预测因素。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 May 18;10(10):e020033. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.020033. Epub 2021 May 7.
3
Validation of the 2019 Expert Consensus Algorithm for the Management of Conduction Disturbances After TAVR.
经导管主动脉瓣置换术后传导障碍管理 2019 专家共识算法验证。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 May 10;14(9):981-991. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.03.010.
4
Impact of Interventricular membranous septum length on pacemaker need with different Transcatheter aortic valve implantation systems.不同经导管主动脉瓣植入系统中心室间隔膜长度对起搏器需求的影响。
Int J Cardiol. 2021 Jun 15;333:152-158. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2021.02.080. Epub 2021 Mar 3.
5
2020 ACC Expert Consensus Decision Pathway on Management of Conduction Disturbances in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Solution Set Oversight Committee.2020 年美国心脏病学会专家共识决策路径:经导管主动脉瓣置换术患者传导障碍管理——美国心脏病学会解决方案监督委员会报告。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Nov 17;76(20):2391-2411. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.08.050. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
6
Utility of 30-Day Continuous Ambulatory Monitoring to Identify Patients With Delayed Occurrence of Atrioventricular Block After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后 30 天连续动态监测对诊断房室传导阻滞迟发的作用。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Dec;12(12):e007635. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.007635. Epub 2019 Dec 13.
7
Ambulatory Rhythm Monitoring to Detect Late High-Grade Atrioventricular Block Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后动态心电图监测晚期高度房室传导阻滞。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 May 28;73(20):2538-2547. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.02.068.
8
The "Big Five" Complications After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Do We Still Have to Be Afraid of Them?经导管主动脉瓣置换术后的“五大”并发症:我们还需要惧怕它们吗?
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Feb 25;12(4):370-372. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.12.019.
9
Arrhythmic Burden as Determined by Ambulatory Continuous Cardiac Monitoring in Patients With New-Onset Persistent Left Bundle Branch Block Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: The MARE Study.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后新发持续性左束支传导阻滞患者的动态连续心脏监测的心律失常负担:MARE 研究。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Aug 13;11(15):1495-1505. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.04.016. Epub 2018 Jul 18.
10
Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement with a self-expanding prosthesis.经导管主动脉瓣置换术采用自膨胀式人工瓣膜。
N Engl J Med. 2014 Sep 4;371(10):967-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1408396.