Minato Akinori, Furubayashi Nobuki, Tomoda Toshihisa, Hori Yoshifumi, Kiyoshima Keijiro, Negishi Takahito, Kuroiwa Kentaro, Tomisaki Ikko, Harada Kenichi, Nakamura Motonobu, Fujimoto Naohiro
Department of Urology, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan.
Department of Urology, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan.
Transl Androl Urol. 2024 Jul 31;13(7):1118-1126. doi: 10.21037/tau-24-53. Epub 2024 Jul 12.
The subtype of urothelial carcinoma (SUC) has been known to possess morphological diversity for histologic subtype or divergent differentiation. However, the efficacy of avelumab against SUC remains unclear. Therefore, the effect of the treatment as well as the survival results of avelumab monotherapy were evaluated as a first-line therapeutic maintenance in patients with advanced SUC.
A retrospective analysis was conducted on consecutive patients from the Uro-Oncology Group in Kyushu study population with advanced lower and upper urinary tract cancer who underwent avelumab maintenance therapy without progression after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. Patients with pure urothelial carcinoma (PUC) and SUC were comparatively analyzed based on objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).
Out of 49 recorded patients, 38 and 11 had PUC and SUC, respectively. The most common subtype element was glandular differentiation (n=5), followed by squamous differentiation (n=3), micropapillary (n=1), and plasmacytoid subtypes (n=1). The SUC and PUC groups had comparable ORR (0% 2.6%, P>0.99) and disease control rates (54.5% 44.7%, P=0.73). These patient groups also showed no significant difference in PFS (median 3.9 3.1 months, P=0.33) or OS (median 16.7 22.1 months, P=0.47).
The response of SUC and PUC to avelumab was comparable in patients with advanced lower and upper urinary tract cancer, indicating that avelumab maintenance therapy is also effective for SUC.
已知尿路上皮癌的亚型(SUC)在组织学亚型或分化差异方面具有形态学多样性。然而,阿维鲁单抗治疗SUC的疗效仍不清楚。因此,评估了阿维鲁单抗单药治疗作为晚期SUC患者一线治疗维持治疗的效果以及生存结果。
对来自九州泌尿肿瘤研究组连续的晚期下尿路和上尿路癌患者进行回顾性分析,这些患者在一线铂类化疗后未进展且接受了阿维鲁单抗维持治疗。基于客观缓解率(ORR)、疾病控制率、无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS),对纯尿路上皮癌(PUC)和SUC患者进行了比较分析。
在49例记录的患者中,分别有38例和11例患有PUC和SUC。最常见的亚型成分是腺性分化(n = 5),其次是鳞状分化(n = 3)、微乳头(n = 1)和浆细胞样亚型(n = 1)。SUC组和PUC组的ORR(0%对2.6%,P>0.99)和疾病控制率(54.5%对44.7%,P = 0.73)相当。这些患者组在PFS(中位值3.9对3.1个月,P = 0.33)或OS(中位值16.7对22.1个月,P = 0.47)方面也无显著差异。
晚期下尿路和上尿路癌患者中,SUC和PUC对阿维鲁单抗的反应相当,表明阿维鲁单抗维持治疗对SUC也有效。