Wei Chunyan, Hu Ming, Chen Guanghui, Yan Zhijing, Yin Wanhong, Wu Zhiang
West China School of Pharmacy, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Department of Pharmacy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Jul 19;15:1446834. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1446834. eCollection 2024.
The medication regimen for critically ill patients is complex and dynamic, leading to a high incidence of drug-related problems. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness and economic efficiency of pharmaceutical care for these patients.
In this prospective cohort study conducted in a tertiary hospital, adult patients were assigned either to a clinical pharmaceutical care group or a control group based on existing clinical grouping rules. Health outcomes and economic indicators were collected, followed by a cost-effectiveness analysis.
The acceptance rate for clinical pharmacist interventions was 89.31%. The pharmaceutical care group exhibited significant reductions in the rate of medication errors (40.65% vs. 61.69%, < 0.001) and adverse drug events (44.52% vs. 56.45%, = 0.020). The usage rates for special-grade antibiotics (85.16% vs. 91.13%, = 0.009) and proton pump inhibitors (77.42% vs. 88.71%, = 0.002) were also lower in the pharmaceutical care group. Secondary outcomes did not show significant differences in total hospital stay (21 days vs. 22 days, = 0.092). However, ICU stay was significantly shorter (9 days vs. 11 days, = 0.003) in the pharmaceutical care group. Cost-effectiveness analysis demonstrated that each 1% reduction in adverse drug events associated with ICU pharmaceutical care saved $226.75 in ICU hospitalization costs and $203.42 in total ICU drug costs. A 1% reduction in the medication error rate saved $128.57 in ICU hospitalization costs and $115.34 in total ICU drug costs.
Pharmaceutical care significantly reduces adverse drug events and medication errors, promotes rational use of medications, decreases the length of ICU stay, and lowers treatment costs in critically ill patients, establishing a definitive advantage in terms of cost-effectiveness.
重症患者的药物治疗方案复杂且多变,导致药物相关问题的发生率较高。本研究旨在评估针对这些患者的药学服务的有效性和经济效率。
在一家三级医院进行的这项前瞻性队列研究中,根据现有的临床分组规则将成年患者分为临床药学服务组或对照组。收集健康结局和经济指标,随后进行成本效益分析。
临床药师干预的接受率为89.31%。药学服务组的用药错误率(40.65%对61.69%,<0.001)和药物不良事件发生率(44.52%对56.45%,=0.020)显著降低。药学服务组的特殊级抗生素使用率(85.16%对91.13%,=0.009)和质子泵抑制剂使用率(77.42%对88.71%,=0.002)也较低。次要结局在总住院天数方面未显示出显著差异(21天对22天,=0.092)。然而,药学服务组的重症监护病房(ICU)住院天数显著缩短(9天对11天,=0.003)。成本效益分析表明,ICU药学服务相关的药物不良事件每降低1%,可节省ICU住院费用226.75美元和ICU总药物费用203.42美元。用药错误率每降低1%,可节省ICU住院费用128.57美元和ICU总药物费用115.34美元。
药学服务显著降低了药物不良事件和用药错误,促进了合理用药,缩短了ICU住院时间,并降低了重症患者的治疗成本,在成本效益方面具有明显优势。