• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美金刚与多奈哌齐联合治疗的不良事件概况:基于2004年至2023年美国食品药品监督管理局不良事件报告系统(FAERS)数据的真实世界药物警戒分析

Adverse event profile of memantine and donepezil combination therapy: a real-world pharmacovigilance analysis based on FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) data from 2004 to 2023.

作者信息

Yang Yihan, Wei Sheng, Tian Huan, Cheng Jing, Zhong Yue, Zhong Xiaoling, Huang Dunbing, Jiang Cai, Ke Xiaohua

机构信息

The Institution of Rehabilitation Industry, Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fuzhou, China.

Department of General Practice, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College, Anhui, China.

出版信息

Front Pharmacol. 2024 Jul 17;15:1439115. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1439115. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fphar.2024.1439115
PMID:39101151
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11294921/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Donepezil in combination with memantine is a widely used clinical therapy for moderate to severe dementia. However, real-world population data on the long-term safety of donepezil in combination with memantine are incomplete and variable. Therefore, the aim of this study was to analyze the adverse events (AEs) of donepezil in combination with memantine according to US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) data to provide evidence for the safety monitoring of this therapy.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed reports of AEs associated with the combination of donepezil and memantine from 2004 to 2023 extracted from the FAERS database. Whether there was a significant association between donepezil and memantine combination therapy and AEs was assessed using four disproportionality analysis methods, namely, the reporting odds ratio, proportional reporting ratio, Bayesian confidence propagation neural network, and multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker methods. To further investigate potential safety issues, we also analyzed differences and similarities in the time of onset and incidence of AEs stratified by sex and differences and similarities in the incidence of AEs stratified by age.

RESULTS

Of the 2,400 adverse drug reaction (ADR) reports in which the combination of donepezil and memantine was the primary suspected drug, most of the affected patients were female (54.96%) and older than 65 years of age (79.08%). We identified 22 different system organ classes covering 100 AEs, including some common AEs such as dizziness and electrocardiogram PR prolongation; fall, pleurothotonus and myoclonus were AEs that were not listed on the drug label. Moreover, we obtained 88 reports of AEs in men and 100 reports of AEs in women; somnolence was a common AE in both men and women and was more common in women, whereas pleurothotonus was a more common AE in men. In addition, we analyzed 12 AEs in patients younger than 18 years, 16 in patients between 18 and 65 years, and 113 in patients older than 65 years. The three age groups had distinctive AEs, but lethargy was the common AE among all age groups. Finally, the median time to AE onset was 19 days in all cases. In both men and women, most AEs occurred within a month of starting donepezil plus memantine, but some continued after a year of treatment.

CONCLUSION

Our study identified potential and new AEs of donepezil in combination with memantine; some of these AEs were the same as in the specification, and some of the AE signals were not shown in the specification. In addition, there were sex and age differences in some of the AEs. Therefore, our findings may provide valuable insights for further studies on the safety of donepezil and memantine combination therapy, which are expected to contribute to the safe use of this therapy in clinical practice.

摘要

背景

多奈哌齐联合美金刚是治疗中重度痴呆的一种广泛应用的临床疗法。然而,关于多奈哌齐联合美金刚长期安全性的真实世界人群数据并不完整且存在差异。因此,本研究的目的是根据美国食品药品监督管理局不良事件报告系统(FAERS)的数据,分析多奈哌齐联合美金刚的不良事件(AE),为该疗法的安全性监测提供证据。

方法

我们回顾性分析了从2004年至2023年从FAERS数据库中提取的与多奈哌齐和美金刚联合用药相关的AE报告。使用四种不成比例分析方法,即报告比值比、比例报告比、贝叶斯置信传播神经网络和多项伽马泊松收缩器方法,评估多奈哌齐和美金刚联合治疗与AE之间是否存在显著关联。为了进一步调查潜在的安全问题,我们还分析了按性别分层的AE发病时间和发生率的差异与相似性,以及按年龄分层的AE发生率的差异与相似性。

结果

在2400份以多奈哌齐和美金刚联合用药为主要可疑药物的药物不良反应(ADR)报告中,大多数受影响患者为女性(54.96%)且年龄大于65岁(79.08%)。我们确定了22个不同的系统器官类别,涵盖100种AE,包括一些常见的AE,如头晕和心电图PR间期延长;跌倒、角弓反张和肌阵挛是未在药品标签上列出的AE。此外,我们获得了88份男性AE报告和100份女性AE报告;嗜睡是男性和女性中常见的AE,在女性中更常见,而角弓反张在男性中是更常见的AE。此外,我们分析了18岁以下患者的12种AE,18至65岁患者的16种AE,以及65岁以上患者的113种AE。这三个年龄组有独特的AE,但嗜睡是所有年龄组中常见的AE。最后,所有病例中AE发生的中位时间为19天。在男性和女性中,大多数AE在开始使用多奈哌齐加美金刚后的一个月内发生,但有些在治疗一年后仍持续存在。

结论

我们的研究确定了多奈哌齐联合美金刚的潜在和新的AE;其中一些AE与说明书中的相同,而一些AE信号未在说明书中显示。此外,一些AE存在性别和年龄差异。因此,我们的研究结果可能为进一步研究多奈哌齐和美金刚联合治疗的安全性提供有价值的见解,有望有助于该疗法在临床实践中的安全使用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e46e/11294921/5187319b9563/fphar-15-1439115-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e46e/11294921/5cf270dccf64/fphar-15-1439115-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e46e/11294921/eb648d28346e/fphar-15-1439115-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e46e/11294921/3e4ce6edb427/fphar-15-1439115-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e46e/11294921/5187319b9563/fphar-15-1439115-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e46e/11294921/5cf270dccf64/fphar-15-1439115-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e46e/11294921/eb648d28346e/fphar-15-1439115-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e46e/11294921/3e4ce6edb427/fphar-15-1439115-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e46e/11294921/5187319b9563/fphar-15-1439115-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Adverse event profile of memantine and donepezil combination therapy: a real-world pharmacovigilance analysis based on FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) data from 2004 to 2023.美金刚与多奈哌齐联合治疗的不良事件概况:基于2004年至2023年美国食品药品监督管理局不良事件报告系统(FAERS)数据的真实世界药物警戒分析
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Jul 17;15:1439115. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1439115. eCollection 2024.
2
Post-marketing drug safety surveillance of enfortumab vedotin: an observational pharmacovigilance study based on a real-world database.恩福妥滨上市后药物安全性监测:基于真实世界数据库的观察性药物警戒研究。
Front Immunol. 2024 Aug 20;15:1397692. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1397692. eCollection 2024.
3
A real-world pharmacovigilance study of abaloparatide based on the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).基于 FDA 不良事件报告系统(FAERS)的阿巴洛肽真实世界药物警戒研究。
Osteoporos Int. 2023 Dec;34(12):2047-2058. doi: 10.1007/s00198-023-06877-6. Epub 2023 Aug 18.
4
A disproportionality analysis for assessing the safety of FLT3 inhibitors using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).使用美国食品药品监督管理局不良事件报告系统(FAERS)对FLT3抑制剂安全性进行的不均衡性分析。
Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2024 Oct 4;15:20420986241284105. doi: 10.1177/20420986241284105. eCollection 2024.
5
Data mining and safety analysis of avatrombopag: a retrospective pharmacovigilance study based on the US food and drug administration's adverse event reporting system.基于美国食品药品监督管理局不良事件报告系统的阿伐曲泊帕数据挖掘与安全性分析:一项回顾性药物警戒研究。
Sci Rep. 2024 May 17;14(1):11262. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-62129-5.
6
A real-world pharmacovigilance analysis of eslicarbazepine acetate using the FDA adverse events reporting system (FAERS) database from 2013 (Q4) to 2024 (Q1).一项使用美国食品药品监督管理局不良事件报告系统(FAERS)数据库,对2013年第四季度至2024年第一季度醋酸艾司利卡西平进行的真实世界药物警戒分析。
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Sep 20;15:1463560. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1463560. eCollection 2024.
7
Adverse event signal mining and severe adverse event influencing factor analysis of Lumateperone based on FAERS database.基于FAERS数据库的鲁马哌酮不良事件信号挖掘及严重不良事件影响因素分析
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Sep 23;15:1472648. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1472648. eCollection 2024.
8
Real-world pharmacovigilance analysis of galsulfase: a study based on the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) database.加硫酶的真实世界药物警戒分析:一项基于美国食品药品监督管理局不良事件报告系统(FAERS)数据库的研究
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Aug 5;15:1420126. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1420126. eCollection 2024.
9
Safety assessment of Tafamidis: a real-world pharmacovigilance study of FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) events.他法米替尼的安全性评估:FDA 不良事件报告系统(FAERS)事件的真实世界药物警戒研究。
BMC Pharmacol Toxicol. 2024 Sep 27;25(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s40360-024-00790-2.
10
A disproportionality analysis of adverse events associated to pertuzumab in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).基于 FDA 不良事件报告系统(FAERS)评估曲妥珠单抗相关不良反应的比例失调分析。
BMC Pharmacol Toxicol. 2023 Nov 13;24(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s40360-023-00702-w.

引用本文的文献

1
Immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated myocarditis and pericarditis: a pharmacovigilance study based on the FAERS database.免疫检查点抑制剂相关的心肌炎和心包炎:一项基于FAERS数据库的药物警戒研究。
BMC Cancer. 2025 Aug 9;25(1):1294. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-14668-x.
2
A meta-analysis update evaluating the treatment effects of donepezil alone versus donepezil combined with memantine for Alzheimer's disease.一项评估多奈哌齐单药治疗与多奈哌齐联合美金刚治疗阿尔茨海默病疗效的荟萃分析更新
IBRO Neurosci Rep. 2025 May 29;19:72-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ibneur.2025.05.016. eCollection 2025 Dec.
3
Neurological adverse events associated with baclofen: a pharmacovigilance study based on FDA adverse event reporting system.

本文引用的文献

1
2024 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures.2024 年阿尔茨海默病事实和数据。
Alzheimers Dement. 2024 May;20(5):3708-3821. doi: 10.1002/alz.13809. Epub 2024 Apr 30.
2
Adverse drug events associated with linezolid administration: a real-world pharmacovigilance study from 2004 to 2023 using the FAERS database.与利奈唑胺给药相关的药物不良事件:一项使用FAERS数据库的2004年至2023年真实世界药物警戒研究。
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Feb 16;15:1338902. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1338902. eCollection 2024.
3
Thromboembolic Events Associated with Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors: A Pharmacovigilance Analysis of the US FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) Database.
与巴氯芬相关的神经系统不良事件:一项基于美国食品药品监督管理局不良事件报告系统的药物警戒研究。
Front Pharmacol. 2025 May 14;16:1569602. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1569602. eCollection 2025.
4
A real-world pharmacovigilance study of adverse drug reactions associated with lecanemab and aducanumab based on WHO-VigiAccess and FAERS databases.一项基于世界卫生组织药物警戒数据库(WHO-VigiAccess)和美国食品药品监督管理局不良事件报告系统(FAERS)数据库的、关于与lecanemab和aducanumab相关的药物不良反应的真实世界药物警戒研究。
Front Pharmacol. 2025 Apr 1;16:1561020. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1561020. eCollection 2025.
5
Characterizing ADRs of Enfortumab vedotin and Erdafitinib in bladder cancer treatment: a descriptive analysis from WHO-VigiAccess.恩诺单抗维妥珠单抗和厄达替尼在膀胱癌治疗中的药物不良反应特征:来自世界卫生组织药物警戒数据库的描述性分析
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Dec 6;15:1503154. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1503154. eCollection 2024.
6
New Insights into the Development of Donepezil-Based Hybrid and Natural Molecules as Multi-Target Drug Agents for Alzheimer's Disease Treatment.新型多靶点药物设计:以多奈哌齐为基础的杂合及天然产物在阿尔茨海默病治疗中的应用
Molecules. 2024 Nov 11;29(22):5314. doi: 10.3390/molecules29225314.
7
Comment on "The Relationship Between Antipsychotics, Cognitive Enhancers, and Major Adverse Cardiovascular/Cerebrovascular Events (MACCE) in Older Adults with Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia".关于“抗精神病药物、认知增强剂与患有痴呆行为和心理症状的老年人的主要不良心血管/脑血管事件(MACCE)之间的关系”的评论
Drugs Aging. 2024 Oct;41(10):859-861. doi: 10.1007/s40266-024-01152-7. Epub 2024 Oct 9.
表皮生长因子受体酪氨酸激酶抑制剂相关的血栓栓塞事件:美国 FDA 不良事件报告系统(FAERS)数据库的药物警戒分析。
Clin Drug Investig. 2024 Mar;44(3):199-207. doi: 10.1007/s40261-024-01346-2. Epub 2024 Feb 20.
4
Contrastive analysis on the safety of brand and generic nebivolol: a real-world pharmacovigilance study based on the FDA adverse event reporting system.比索洛尔品牌药与仿制药安全性的对比分析:一项基于美国食品药品监督管理局不良事件报告系统的真实世界药物警戒研究
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Jan 31;15:1280201. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1280201. eCollection 2024.
5
A real-world disproportionality analysis of mesalazine data mining of the public version of FDA adverse event reporting system.对美国食品药品监督管理局不良事件报告系统公开版本中美沙拉嗪数据挖掘的真实世界不均衡性分析。
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Jan 31;15:1290975. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1290975. eCollection 2024.
6
Comparing the difference of adverse events with HER2 inhibitors: a study of the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS).比较HER2抑制剂不良事件的差异:一项关于美国食品药品监督管理局不良事件报告系统(FAERS)的研究。
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Jan 24;15:1288362. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1288362. eCollection 2024.
7
Prevalence of DSM-5 mild and major neurocognitive disorder in India: Results from the LASI-DAD.DSM-5 轻度和重度神经认知障碍在印度的流行情况:LASI-DAD 的结果。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 7;19(2):e0297220. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297220. eCollection 2024.
8
Metformin adverse event profile: a pharmacovigilance study based on the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) from 2004 to 2022.二甲双胍不良事件特征:基于 2004 年至 2022 年 FDA 不良事件报告系统(FAERS)的药物警戒研究。
Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2024 Jan-Jun;17(2):189-201. doi: 10.1080/17512433.2024.2306223. Epub 2024 Jan 29.
9
Hematological adverse events associated with anti-MRSA agents: a real-world analysis based on FAERS.抗耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌药物相关的血液学不良事件:基于 FAERS 的真实世界分析。
Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2024 Oct;23(10):1283-1293. doi: 10.1080/14740338.2024.2309225. Epub 2024 Jan 25.
10
Recent trends in treatment strategies for Alzheimers disease and the challenges: A topical advancement.阿尔茨海默病治疗策略的最新趋势与挑战:一项前沿进展。
Ageing Res Rev. 2024 Feb;94:102199. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2024.102199. Epub 2024 Jan 15.