Suppr超能文献

骨和皮下组织中的青霉素浓度:比较口服和静脉治疗的猪微透析研究。

Penicillin concentrations in bone and subcutaneous tissue: A porcine microdialysis study comparing oral and intravenous treatment.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.

Aarhus Denmark Microdialysis Research (ADMIRE), Orthopaedic Research Laboratory, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.

出版信息

J Orthop Res. 2024 Dec;42(12):2844-2851. doi: 10.1002/jor.25947. Epub 2024 Aug 5.

Abstract

Penicillin is available in both an oral (penicillin V) and intravenous formulation (penicillin G), theoretically allowing for a safe transition between the two. However, the use of oral penicillin remains a topic of debate due to low and variable bioavailability. This study aimed to assess the time for which the free penicillin concentration exceeded targeted minimum inhibitory concentrations for Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus species (0.125, 0.25, and 0.5 mg/L) in cancellous bone and subcutaneous tissue after intravenous penicillin and oral penicillin administration. 12 female pigs (68-75 kg) were assigned, according to local standard clinical regimes, to either intravenous penicillin (1.2 g) or oral penicillin (0.8 g) treatment every 6 h over an 18 h period. Microdialysis catheters were placed for sampling in tibial cancellous bone and adjacent subcutaneous tissue. Data was dynamic/continually collected in the first dosing interval (0-6 h), simulating a prophylactic situation, and the third dosing interval (12-18 h), simulating a therapeutic setting. Plasma samples were collected for reference. For all investigated targets, intravenous treatment resulted in a longer mean time above relevant minimum inhibitory concentrations in cancellous bone during the first dosing interval, and in both cancellous bone and subcutaneous tissue during the third dosing interval compared to oral treatment. With clinically relevant dosing, intravenous penicillin provides superior exposure compared to oral penicillin in both a prophylactic and therapeutic setting.

摘要

青霉素既有口服制剂(青霉素 V)又有静脉注射制剂(青霉素 G),理论上可以在两者之间安全转换。然而,由于生物利用度低且变化较大,口服青霉素的使用仍然存在争议。本研究旨在评估静脉注射青霉素和口服青霉素给药后,在松质骨和皮下组织中游离青霉素浓度超过金黄色葡萄球菌和链球菌种(0.125、0.25 和 0.5 mg/L)目标最小抑菌浓度的时间。根据当地标准临床方案,将 12 头雌性猪(68-75 公斤)分配到静脉注射青霉素(1.2 克)或口服青霉素(0.8 克)治疗组,每 6 小时给药一次,持续 18 小时。放置微透析导管用于在胫骨松质骨和相邻的皮下组织中取样。在第一个给药间隔(0-6 小时)中动态/连续采集数据,模拟预防性情况,在第三个给药间隔(12-18 小时)中模拟治疗性情况。采集血浆样本作为参考。对于所有研究的目标,与口服治疗相比,静脉治疗在第一个给药间隔期间在松质骨中使相关最小抑菌浓度以上的平均时间更长,在第三个给药间隔期间在松质骨和皮下组织中使相关最小抑菌浓度以上的平均时间更长。在临床相关剂量下,与口服青霉素相比,静脉注射青霉素在预防性和治疗性环境中均提供了更好的暴露。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验