Rootlieb Jasmijn M, Polspoel Sigrid, Brienesse Patrick, Smits Cas
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Ear and Hearing, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Ear and Hearing, Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Int J Audiol. 2025 Apr;64(4):314-319. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2024.2382201. Epub 2024 Aug 5.
Wireless sound transfer methods for cochlear implant sound processors have become popular for remote self-assessed hearing tests. The aim of this study was to determine (1) spectral differences in stimuli between different wireless sound transfer options and (2) the effect on outcomes of speech recognition tests in noise.
In study 1, the frequency response of different streaming options (Phonak Roger Select, Cochlear Mini Mic 2+, telecoil and Bluetooth connection) was measured by connecting headphones to CI sound processors. Study 2 followed a repeated measures design in which digits-in-noise (DIN) tests were performed using wireless streaming to sound processors from Cochlear, Advanced Bionics, and MED-EL.
20 normal hearing participants.
Differences in frequency response between loudspeaker and wireless streaming conditions were minimal. We did not find significant difference in DIN outcome (F = 1.062, p = 0.376) between the wireless transfer options with the Cochlear Nucleus 7 processor. No significant difference in DIN outcomes was found between Bluetooth streaming and the loudspeaker condition for all of the three tested brands. The mean standard error of measurement was 0.72 dB.
No significant differences in DIN test outcomes between wireless sound transfer and the reference method were found.
用于人工耳蜗声音处理器的无线声音传输方法已在远程自我评估听力测试中广泛应用。本研究旨在确定:(1)不同无线声音传输方式下刺激信号的频谱差异;(2)对噪声环境下言语识别测试结果的影响。
在研究1中,通过将耳机连接到人工耳蜗声音处理器,测量不同传输方式(峰力Roger Select、科利耳Mini Mic 2+、感应线圈和蓝牙连接)的频率响应。研究2采用重复测量设计,使用来自科利耳、先进生物电子和美迪乐的无线传输方式对人工耳蜗声音处理器进行噪声中数字测试(DIN)。
20名听力正常的受试者。
扬声器和无线传输条件下的频率响应差异极小。我们发现,使用科利耳Nucleus 7处理器的无线传输方式在DIN测试结果上没有显著差异(F = 1.062,p = 0.376)。在所有三个测试品牌中,蓝牙传输和扬声器条件下的DIN测试结果均无显著差异。测量的平均标准误差为0.72 dB。
未发现无线声音传输与参考方法在DIN测试结果上存在显著差异。