Division of Pancreatic Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
West China School of Medicine, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
FASEB J. 2024 Aug 15;38(15):e23867. doi: 10.1096/fj.202302484RR.
There is a significant difference in prognosis and response to chemotherapy between basal and classical subtypes of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Further biomarkers are required to identify subtypes of PDAC. We selected candidate biomarkers via review articles. Correlations between these candidate markers and the PDAC molecular subtype gene sets were analyzed using bioinformatics, confirming the biomarkers for identifying classical and basal subtypes. Subsequently, 298 PDAC patients were included, and their tumor tissues were immunohistochemically stratified using these biomarkers. Survival data underwent analysis, including Cox proportional hazards modeling. Our results indicate that the pairwise and triple combinations of KRT5/KRT17/S100A2 exhibit a higher correlation coefficient with the basal-like subtype gene set, whereas the corresponding combinations of GATA6/HNF4A/TFF1 show a higher correlation with the classical subtype gene set. Whether analyzing unmatched or propensity-matched data, the overall survival time was significantly shorter for the basal subtype compared with the classical subtype (p < .001), with basal subtype patients also facing a higher risk of mortality (HR = 4.017, 95% CI 2.675-6.032, p < .001). In conclusion, the combined expression of KRT5, KRT17, and S100A2, in both pairwise and triple combinations, independently predicts shorter overall survival in PDAC patients and likely identifies the basal subtype. Similarly, the combined expression of GATA6, HNF4A, and TFF1, in the same manner, may indicate the classical subtype. In our study, the combined application of established biomarkers offers valuable insights for the prognostic evaluation of PDAC patients.
基底型和经典型胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)患者的预后和化疗反应存在显著差异。需要进一步的生物标志物来识别 PDAC 的亚型。我们通过综述文章选择了候选生物标志物。使用生物信息学分析这些候选标志物与 PDAC 分子亚型基因集之间的相关性,从而验证了用于识别经典型和基底型亚型的生物标志物。随后,纳入了 298 名 PDAC 患者,并使用这些生物标志物对其肿瘤组织进行免疫组织化学分层。对生存数据进行了分析,包括 Cox 比例风险模型。我们的结果表明,KRT5/KRT17/S100A2 的两两和三重组合与基底样亚型基因集的相关性更高,而 GATA6/HNF4A/TFF1 的相应组合与经典亚型基因集的相关性更高。无论是分析未配对还是倾向匹配的数据,基底型的总生存时间明显短于经典型(p<0.001),基底型患者的死亡风险也更高(HR=4.017,95%CI 2.675-6.032,p<0.001)。总之,KRT5、KRT17 和 S100A2 的联合表达,无论是两两组合还是三重组合,均可独立预测 PDAC 患者的总生存时间较短,并可能识别出基底型。同样,GATA6、HNF4A 和 TFF1 的联合表达也可能表明为经典型。在我们的研究中,这些既定生物标志物的联合应用为 PDAC 患者的预后评估提供了有价值的见解。