Suppr超能文献

后交叉韧带保留与后交叉韧带牺牲:内侧匹配型全膝关节置换术患者结局比较

Posterior Cruciate Ligament Preservation versus Posterior Cruciate Ligament Sacrifice: Comparing Patient Outcomes in Medial Congruent Total Knee Arthroplasty.

作者信息

Guild George N, McConnell Mary J, Najafi Farideh, Naylor Brandon H, DeCook Charles A, Bradbury Thomas L

机构信息

Total Joint Specialists, LLC, Advanced Center for Joint Surgery and Northside Hospital Forsyth, Cumming, Georgia.

出版信息

J Knee Surg. 2025 Jan;38(1):7-12. doi: 10.1055/a-2379-6488. Epub 2024 Aug 5.

Abstract

This study aimed to compare outcomes and complication rates between posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) retention and excision utilizing a medial congruent (MC) polyethylene insert in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in a specialized ambulatory surgery center (ASC) dedicated to hip and knee arthroplasty. A retrospective review was performed between May 2023 and October 2023 analyzing 398 patients who underwent primary MC TKA by high-volume joint arthroplasty surgeons ( = 9) with either PCL preservation ( = 264) or sacrifice ( = 134) in a single free-standing ASC. Patients were matched chronologically on a 2:1 basis. Demographics, baseline function, 90-day complications, and patient-reported outcomes were recorded for each patient. There were no differences in preoperative baseline function or patient-reported outcome measures, Charlson Comorbidity Index, or American Society of Anesthesiologists class among patient groups. The PCL-preserve and PCL-sacrifice cohorts showed significant variation in 12-week postoperative Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome, Junior (KOOS, JR.) scores. Specifically, the number of patients who achieved the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in KOOS, JR. scores was higher in the PCL-sacrifice group ( < 0.05). Yet, no complications within the 90-day period were associated with PCL status and other patient-reported outcomes. This study comparing outcomes between MC TKAs with PCL retention and sacrifice suggests that both techniques are viable options with similar functional outcomes, pain scores, and complication rates, which may have benefits in an ASC setting. The PCL-sacrifice group exhibited a statistically significant increase in patients who achieved the MCID in KOOS, JR. score compared with the PCL-preserving at early follow-up. Future research should employ prospective, randomized designs to further validate these findings and explore long-term implications.

摘要

本研究旨在比较在一家专门从事髋膝关节置换术的门诊手术中心(ASC)进行全膝关节置换术(TKA)时,采用内侧匹配(MC)聚乙烯衬垫保留和切除后交叉韧带(PCL)的疗效和并发症发生率。对2023年5月至2023年10月期间的病例进行回顾性分析,纳入了398例行初次MC TKA的患者,这些患者由9位高年资关节置换外科医生在一家独立的ASC进行手术,其中264例保留PCL,134例切除PCL。患者按时间顺序以2:1的比例进行匹配。记录每位患者的人口统计学资料、基线功能、90天并发症情况以及患者报告的结局。各患者组之间在术前基线功能、患者报告的结局指标、Charlson合并症指数或美国麻醉医师协会分级方面均无差异。PCL保留组和PCL切除组在术后12周的膝关节损伤和骨关节炎疗效评分(KOOS,JR.)上存在显著差异。具体而言,PCL切除组中达到KOOS,JR.评分最小临床重要差异(MCID)的患者数量更多(<0.05)。然而,90天内的并发症与PCL状态及其他患者报告的结局无关。本研究比较了保留和切除PCL的MC TKA的疗效,结果表明这两种技术都是可行的选择,功能结局、疼痛评分和并发症发生率相似,这在ASC环境中可能具有优势。与早期随访时保留PCL的组相比,PCL切除组中达到KOOS,JR.评分MCID的患者在统计学上有显著增加。未来的研究应采用前瞻性随机设计,以进一步验证这些发现并探讨其长期影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验