• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

结直肠无蒂锯齿状病变伴或不伴异型增生/癌的临床和内镜特征:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Clinical and endoscopic characteristics of colorectal sessile serrated lesions with or without dysplasia/carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei Province, China.

出版信息

J Dig Dis. 2024 Jul;25(7):424-435. doi: 10.1111/1751-2980.13302. Epub 2024 Aug 5.

DOI:10.1111/1751-2980.13302
PMID:39104049
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to compare the clinical and endoscopic characteristics of sessile serrated lesions (SSLs) with dysplasia/carcinoma (SSLD/Cs) and SSLs without dysplasia in this systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases and Clinicaltrials.gov were searched for relevant studies published up to August 28, 2023. The primary outcome was lesion size in SSLD/Cs and SSLs without dysplasia. The secondary outcomes included risk of dysplasia/carcinoma, morphology (classified based on the Paris classification), and lesion features such as mucus cap and nodules/protrusions in the two groups.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies with 14 381 patients were included. The proportion of SSLD/Cs ≥10 mm was significantly higher than that of SSLs without dysplasia (odds ratio [OR] 3.82, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.21-12.02, p = 0.02). There was no significant difference in the risk of dysplasia/carcinoma between the proximal (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.57-1.14) and distal colon (OR 1.25, 95% CI 0.88-1.77, p = 0.21). The 0-Ip (OR 2.47, 95% CI 1.50-4.09) and 0-IIa + Is (OR 10.38, 95% CI 3.08-34.98) morphologies were more prevalent among SSLD/Cs, whereas the 0-IIa morphology (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.22-0.65) was more prevalent among SSLs without dysplasia (all p < 0.001). Furthermore, mucus cap (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.42-0.89, p = 0.01) was more common among SSLs without dysplasia, whereas nodules/protrusions (OR 7.80, 95% CI 3.07-19.85, p < 0.001) were more common in SSLD/Cs.

CONCLUSION

SSLs >10 mm, 0-Ip or 0-IIa + Is morphologies, and those with nodules/protrusions are significantly associated with dysplasia/carcinoma.

摘要

目的

本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在比较有和无发育不良/癌变(SSL-D/C)的无蒂锯齿状病变(SSL)的临床和内镜特征。

方法

检索 MEDLINE、EMBASE 和 Cochrane 图书馆数据库以及 Clinicaltrials.gov,以获取截至 2023 年 8 月 28 日发表的相关研究。主要结局是 SSL-D/C 和无发育不良 SSL 的病变大小。次要结局包括发育不良/癌变风险、形态(基于巴黎分类进行分类)以及两组中病变特征,如黏液帽和结节/隆起。

结果

纳入了 13 项研究共 14381 例患者。SSL-D/C 中≥10mm 的比例明显高于无发育不良 SSL(优势比 [OR]3.82,95%置信区间 [CI]1.21-12.02,p=0.02)。近端结肠(OR0.80,95%CI0.57-1.14)和远端结肠(OR1.25,95%CI0.88-1.77,p=0.21)的发育不良/癌变风险无显著差异。0-Ip(OR2.47,95%CI1.50-4.09)和 0-IIa+Is(OR10.38,95%CI3.08-34.98)形态在 SSL-D/C 中更为常见,而无发育不良 SSL 中更常见的是 0-IIa 形态(OR0.38,95%CI0.22-0.65,均 p<0.001)。此外,无发育不良 SSL 中黏液帽(OR0.61,95%CI0.42-0.89,p=0.01)更为常见,而 SSL-D/C 中结节/隆起(OR7.80,95%CI3.07-19.85,p<0.001)更为常见。

结论

10mm、0-Ip 或 0-IIa+Is 形态以及有结节/隆起的 SSL 与发育不良/癌变显著相关。

相似文献

1
Clinical and endoscopic characteristics of colorectal sessile serrated lesions with or without dysplasia/carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.结直肠无蒂锯齿状病变伴或不伴异型增生/癌的临床和内镜特征:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Dig Dis. 2024 Jul;25(7):424-435. doi: 10.1111/1751-2980.13302. Epub 2024 Aug 5.
2
Clinical and endoscopic characteristics of sessile serrated lesions with dysplasia/carcinoma.无锯齿状息肉伴异型增生/癌的临床和内镜特征。
Korean J Intern Med. 2023 May;38(3):349-361. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2022.322. Epub 2023 Mar 27.
3
Usefulness of the Japan narrow-band imaging expert team classification system for the diagnosis of sessile serrated lesion with dysplasia/carcinoma.日本窄带成像专家分类系统对无蒂锯齿状病变伴异型增生/癌的诊断价值。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Aug;35(8):4528-4538. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07967-w. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
4
Endoscopic diagnosis for colorectal sessile serrated lesions.结直肠无蒂锯齿状病变的内镜诊断。
World J Gastroenterol. 2021 Apr 7;27(13):1321-1329. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i13.1321.
5
Sessile serrated lesions: Clinicopathological characteristics, endoscopic diagnosis, and management.无蒂锯齿状病变:临床病理特征、内镜诊断和处理。
Dig Endosc. 2022 Sep;34(6):1096-1109. doi: 10.1111/den.14273. Epub 2022 Mar 29.
6
Endoscopic diagnosis of sessile serrated adenoma/polyp with and without dysplasia/carcinoma.内镜诊断无蒂锯齿状腺瘤/息肉伴和不伴异型增生/癌。
World J Gastroenterol. 2018 Aug 7;24(29):3250-3259. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i29.3250.
7
Endoscopic features with associated histological and molecular alterations in serrated polyps with dysplasia: Retrospective analysis of a tertiary case series.锯齿状息肉伴异型增生的内镜特征及其相关的组织学和分子改变:一项三级病例系列的回顾性分析。
Dig Liver Dis. 2024 Apr;56(4):687-694. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2023.09.007. Epub 2023 Sep 29.
8
Increased Colorectal Neoplasia Risk in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Serrated Polyps with Dysplasia.炎症性肠病伴锯齿状息肉伴异型增生患者结直肠肿瘤风险增加。
Dig Dis Sci. 2022 Dec;67(12):5647-5656. doi: 10.1007/s10620-022-07485-w. Epub 2022 Apr 5.
9
Clinicopathological Correlates of Dysplastic Sessile Serrated Lesion: A Prospective Cohort Study With a High Detection Rate.发育异常的无蒂锯齿状病变的临床病理相关性:一项高检出率的前瞻性队列研究
Gastro Hep Adv. 2022 Mar 30;1(3):313-320. doi: 10.1016/j.gastha.2021.12.010. eCollection 2022.
10
Serrated Polyps and the Risk of Metachronous Colorectal Advanced Neoplasia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.锯齿状息肉与结直肠异时性高级别腺瘤的风险:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Jan;20(1):31-43.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.09.051. Epub 2020 Sep 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical and endoscopic characteristics of colorectal sessile serrated lesion with dysplasia: a single-center cross-sectional comparative study.伴有发育异常的结直肠无蒂锯齿状病变的临床及内镜特征:一项单中心横断面比较研究
J Gastrointest Oncol. 2025 Jun 30;16(3):802-810. doi: 10.21037/jgo-2024-901. Epub 2025 Jun 24.
2
Dietary pattern and lifestyle risk factors for sessile serrated precursors to colorectal cancer.结直肠癌无蒂锯齿状前驱病变的饮食模式和生活方式风险因素。
Br J Nutr. 2025 Jul 14;134(1):35-46. doi: 10.1017/S0007114525103747. Epub 2025 Jun 24.