Interobserver reliability of shoulder radiographic findings and correlation to MRI: a preliminary case series.

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate the interobserver reliability of measurements of the Acromiohumeral Distance (AHD) first described by Golding et al., the Critical Shoulder Angle (CSA), the Acromion Index with Glenoid Humeral (GH) and Glenoid Acromial (GA) distances, following the measuring method by Nyffeler et al., the Lateral Acromion Angle (LAA), as well as the morphology of the acromion according to Bigliani and the humeral head position according to Maloney in X-rays and MRI. Furthermore, the study assessed the correlation of measurement results in X-ray with those in MRI for AHD, CSA, GA, GH, AI, and LAA.

METHODS

A total of 187 patients who underwent shoulder joint X-ray and MRI examinations from 09/2016 to 05/2023 were included in the study. Patients with poor imaging quality, arthrosis or radical prior surgeries, like shoulder prosthetic surgery, status post humerus fractures, that have undergone surgery and therefore changed the anatomical features were excluded, what lead to a total study population of 78. X-ray measurements were performed by two observers in the true anteroposterior view, so that the humeral head and the glenoid are shown without overlap, providing a clear view into the joint space. MRI measurements were performed in oblique coronal MRI slices, using the most accurately depicted glenoid surface as a landmark.

RESULTS

Interobserver measurement results showed a significance with p < 0.001 for the assessment of acromion type according to Bigliani, humeral head offset assessment according to Maloney, and AHD. No significance was found for interobserver reliability in measuring LAA. Additionally, there was a high correlation of measurement results in X-ray with measurements in MRI for, CSA, GH/GA, and consequently AI, a good correlation for AHD but no correlation could be shown for LAA.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings provide valuable insights into the robustness of radiological parameters for evaluating shoulder pathology, offering promising prospects for clinical applications and further research. Nevertheless, the specific methodological considerations and patient characteristics should be taken into account when interpreting the results to ensure their accurate application in clinical practice.