Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Santa Maria Annunziata Hospital, ASL Toscana Centro - Via Antella 58, 50012, Bagno a Ripoli, Italy.
Department of Shoulder Surgery, AOU Careggi, University Hospital of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Aug;144(8):3533-3539. doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05466-4. Epub 2024 Aug 6.
The optimal treatment approach for Bony Bankart remains a subject of considerable debate among shoulder surgeons. Existing literature highlights low recurrence rates and high patient satisfaction with nonoperative treatment, particularly in the middle-aged population. This study aimed to evaluate the recurrence rate of dislocation, as well as the clinical and functional outcomes in middle-aged individuals treated nonoperatively following an acute bony Bankart fracture. Additionally, the impact of glenoid rim size and fragmentation on the treatment outcome was investigated.
A prospective analysis was conducted on 20 patients aged over 50 with nonoperatively treated bony Bankart fractures, ensuring a minimum follow-up of 24 months. The study population was categorized based on fragment size (small and medium) according to Kim classification and glenoid rim fragmentation (type 1b and 1c) according to Scheibel classification. Data including UCLA score, Rowe score, recurrence rate, clinical instability, and range of motion (ROM) were collected and analyzed.
The average UCLA and Rowe scores were 32.15 ± 2.85 and 93.85 ± 2.19, respectively, with no instances of dislocation recurrence. The affected shoulder exhibited no significant reductions in ROM compared to the contralateral side, except for a loss of external rotation (ER) (13.08° ± 7.51; p = 0.005). No differences were observed based on fragment size, although patients with multifragmented glenoid rims showed a greater loss of ER compared to those with a solitary fragment, albeit not reaching statistical significance.
Nonoperative treatment appears to be a viable and effective option for middle-aged individuals with bony Bankart fractures, resulting in favorable functional outcomes and a low risk of recurrence. Additionally, a notable loss of external rotation was observed in fractures with glenoid rim fragmentation.
IV.
在肩关节外科医生中,对于 Bankart 骨损伤的最佳治疗方法仍存在广泛争议。现有文献强调非手术治疗具有较低的复发率和较高的患者满意度,尤其是在中年人群中。本研究旨在评估急性 Bankart 骨骨折后接受非手术治疗的中年患者的脱位复发率,以及临床和功能结果。此外,还研究了肩盂缘大小和碎裂对治疗结果的影响。
对 20 例年龄在 50 岁以上的非手术治疗 Bankart 骨骨折患者进行前瞻性分析,确保随访时间至少 24 个月。根据 Kim 分类,将研究人群分为小和中骨碎片组,根据 Scheibel 分类,将肩盂缘分为 1b 型和 1c 型碎裂组。收集并分析包括 UCLA 评分、Rowe 评分、复发率、临床不稳定和活动范围(ROM)在内的数据。
平均 UCLA 和 Rowe 评分为 32.15±2.85 和 93.85±2.19,无脱位复发。患肩的 ROM 与对侧相比没有明显减少,除了外旋(ER)减少(13.08°±7.51;p=0.005)。尽管根据骨碎片大小没有观察到差异,但具有多碎裂肩盂缘的患者与具有单一骨碎片的患者相比,ER 丧失更大,但无统计学意义。
非手术治疗似乎是一种可行且有效的选择,适用于中年 Bankart 骨骨折患者,可获得良好的功能结果,且复发风险低。此外,肩盂缘碎裂的骨折患者观察到显著的外旋丧失。
IV 级。