Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington.
University of Virginia Comprehensive Cancer Center, Charlottesville, Virginia.
Clin Cancer Res. 2024 Oct 15;30(20):4609-4617. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-24-0499.
PURPOSE: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma upregulates CD73, potentially contributing to immune surveillance evasion. Combining oleclumab (CD73 inhibitor) and durvalumab with chemotherapy may identify an effective treatment option. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We describe a multicenter phase Ib/II randomized clinical trial in patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, untreated (cohort A) or previously received gemcitabine-based chemotherapy (cohort B; NCT03611556). During escalation, patients received oleclumab 1,500 or 3,000 mg, durvalumab 1,500 mg, and gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP; cohort A; n = 14) or modified FOLFOX (cohort B; n = 11). During expansion, cohort A patients (n = 170) were randomized to GnP (arm A1), oleclumab [recommended phase II dose (RP2D)] with GnP (arm A2), or oleclumab (RP2D) with durvalumab plus GnP (arm A3). Primary objectives were safety (escalation) and objective response rate (expansion). Secondary objectives included progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: During escalation, 1/11 patients from cohort B (oleclumab 3,000 mg) experienced two dose-limiting toxicities. Oleclumab's RP2D was 3,000 mg. During expansion, grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 67.7% (42/62) of patients in A1, 73.7% (28/38) in A2, and 77.1% (54/70) in A3. The objective response rate was 29.0%, 21.1%, and 32.9% in A1, A2, and A3, respectively (A1 vs. A3; P = 0.650). PFS [HR = 0.72; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.47, 1.11] and OS (HR = 0.75; 95% CI, 0.50-1.13) were similar for A3 versus A1. Patients with high CD73 expression had improved PFS and OS in A3 versus A1, although this should be interpreted with caution. CONCLUSIONS: Although the safety profile was acceptable, this study did not meet its primary efficacy endpoint.
目的:胰腺导管腺癌上调 CD73,可能有助于逃避免疫监视。联合使用 oleclumab(CD73 抑制剂)和 durvalumab 与化疗可能会确定一种有效的治疗选择。
患者和方法:我们描述了一项多中心 Ib/II 期随机临床试验,纳入了未经治疗(队列 A)或先前接受过吉西他滨为基础化疗(队列 B;NCT03611556)的转移性胰腺导管腺癌患者。在升级阶段,患者接受 oleclumab 1500 或 3000mg、durvalumab 1500mg 以及吉西他滨加 nab-紫杉醇(GnP;队列 A;n=14)或改良 FOLFOX(队列 B;n=11)治疗。在扩展阶段,队列 A 患者(n=170)被随机分配至 GnP(A1 臂)、oleclumab(推荐的 II 期剂量[RP2D])加 GnP(A2 臂)或 oleclumab(RP2D)加 durvalumab 加 GnP(A3 臂)。主要终点为安全性(升级阶段)和客观缓解率(扩展阶段)。次要终点包括无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)。
结果:在升级阶段,队列 B 中有 1/11 例患者(oleclumab 3000mg 组)出现了 2 例剂量限制性毒性。oleclumab 的 RP2D 为 3000mg。在扩展阶段,A1 组中 67.7%(42/62)的患者、A2 组中 73.7%(28/38)的患者和 A3 组中 77.1%(54/70)的患者发生了≥3 级治疗相关不良事件。A1、A2 和 A3 组的客观缓解率分别为 29.0%、21.1%和 32.9%(A1 与 A3 比较;P=0.650)。A3 组与 A1 组的 PFS[风险比(HR)=0.72;95%置信区间(CI),0.47,1.11]和 OS(HR=0.75;95%CI,0.50,1.13)相似。A3 组中 CD73 高表达的患者 PFS 和 OS 优于 A1 组,但应谨慎解释。
结论:尽管安全性特征可接受,但该研究未达到其主要疗效终点。
Invest New Drugs. 2017-11-8
Cancers (Basel). 2025-7-15
J Inherit Metab Dis. 2025-5
Int J Mol Sci. 2024-10-28
CA Cancer J Clin. 2024
Cancers (Basel). 2023-9-2
Cancer Immunol Res. 2023-1-3
J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2022-2-9