Bokolo Simamkele, Mabaso Suzanne, Kruger Wentzel, Mistri Preethi, Schmucker Laura, Chetty-Makkan Candice, Pascoe Sophie J S, Buttenheim Alison, Thirumurthy Harsha, Long Lawrence
Faculty of Health Sciences, Health Economics and Epidemiology Research Office, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Foundation for Professional Development (FPD), Pretoria, South Africa.
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Aug 6;4(8):e0003465. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003465. eCollection 2024.
Expanding free HIV testing service (HTS) access to include private clinics could increase testing rates. A donor funded programme, GP Care Cell, offered free HIV testing at selected private doctor-led clinics but uptake was low. We investigated whether HTS demand creation materials that used behavioural economics principles could increase demand for HIV testing at these clinics. We conducted a randomised controlled trial in Johannesburg, South Africa (January-April 2022) distributing brochures promoting HTS to adults in five private doctor-led clinic catchment areas. Individuals were randomised to receive three brochure types: (1) "Standard of care" (SOC) advertising a free HIV test and ART; (2) "Healthy lifestyle screening" promoted free low-cost health screenings in addition to HTS; and (3) "Recipient of care voucher" leveraged loss aversion and the endowment effect by highlighting the monetary value of free HTS. The primary outcome was presenting at the clinic following exposure to the brochures. Logistic regression compared outcomes between arms. We found that of the 12,129 brochures distributed, 658 were excluded because of errors or duplicates and 11,471 were analysed. About 59% of brochure recipients were male and 50,3% were aged 25-34 years. In total, 448 (3.9%) brochure recipients presented at the private doctor-led clinics of which 50.7% were males. There were no significant differences in clinic presentation between the healthy lifestyle screening and SOC arm (Adjusted Odds Ratio [AOR] 1.02; 95% CI 0.79-1.32), and similarly between the recipient of care voucher and SOC arm (AOR 1.08; 95% CI 0.84-1.39). Individuals were more likely to attend centrally-located clinics that had visible HTS branding (AOR = 5.30; 95% CI: 4.14-6.79). Brochures that used behavioural insights did not increase demand for HTS at private doctor-led clinics. However, consistent distribution of the brochures may have potential to increase HIV testing uptake at highly visible private doctor-led clinics.
扩大免费艾滋病毒检测服务(HTS)的覆盖范围,将私人诊所纳入其中,可能会提高检测率。一个由捐赠者资助的项目“全科医疗小组”在选定的由私人医生主导的诊所提供免费艾滋病毒检测,但接受度较低。我们调查了运用行为经济学原理的HTS需求创造材料是否能增加这些诊所对艾滋病毒检测的需求。我们在南非约翰内斯堡进行了一项随机对照试验(2022年1月至4月),在五个由私人医生主导的诊所服务区域向成年人发放宣传HTS的手册。个体被随机分配接受三种手册类型:(1)“护理标准”(SOC),宣传免费艾滋病毒检测和抗逆转录病毒治疗;(2)“健康生活方式筛查”,除了HTS外,还推广免费低成本健康筛查;(3)“护理代金券领取者”,通过强调免费HTS的货币价值,利用损失厌恶和禀赋效应。主要结果是在接触手册后到诊所就诊。逻辑回归比较了各分组之间的结果。我们发现,在分发的12129份手册中,658份因错误或重复而被排除,11471份被分析。手册接受者中约59%为男性,50.3%年龄在25 - 34岁之间。总共有448名(3.9%)手册接受者到由私人医生主导的诊所就诊,其中50.7%为男性。健康生活方式筛查组和SOC组之间在诊所就诊率上没有显著差异(调整后的优势比[AOR]为1.02;95%置信区间为0.79 - 1.32),护理代金券领取者组和SOC组之间同样没有显著差异(AOR为1.08;95%置信区间为0.84 - 1.39)。个体更有可能前往HTS标识明显的位于中心位置的诊所就诊(AOR = 5.30;95%置信区间:4.14 - 6.79)。运用行为洞察的手册并没有增加由私人医生主导的诊所对HTS的需求。然而,持续分发这些手册可能有潜力提高在HTS标识明显的由私人医生主导的诊所的艾滋病毒检测接受度。