Department of Emergency Medicine, National Taiwan University Medical College and Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Department of Emergency Medicine, National Taiwan University Medical College and Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Internal Medicine (Cardiology division), National Taiwan University Medical College and Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Internal Medicine (Cardiology Division), Min-Sheng General Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Am J Emerg Med. 2024 Oct;84:87-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2024.07.038. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
Established protocols for implementing high-quality targeted temperature management (TTM) provide guidance concerning the cooling rate, duration of maintenance, and rewarming speed. However, whether compliant to TTM protocols results in improved survival and better neurological recovery has not been examined.
A retrospective cohort study enrolled 1141 survivors of non-traumatic adult cardiac arrest with a pre-arrest cerebral performance category (CPC) score of 1-2 from 2015 to 2020 at a tertiary medical center. Of the survivors, 330 patients who underwent TTM were further included. Patients with spontaneous hypothermia (<35 °C) (n = 107) and expired during the TTM (n = 21) were excluded. A total of 202 patients were thus enrolled. One hundred and ten patients underwent TTM that completely complied with the protocol (protocol-complaint group), but 92 patients deviated in some manner from the protocol (protocol non-compliant group).
Fifty patients (50%) and 46 patients (50%) in the protocol-compliant and non-compliant groups, respectively, did not survive to hospital discharge. In the protocol-compliant group, 42 patients (38.2%) had favorable neurological recovery, compared with 32 patients (34.8%) in the protocol non-compliant group. After adjusting for age, initial shockable rhythm, witnessed collapse, and cardiopulmonary resuscitation duration, protocol non-compliant was associated with the poor neurological outcomes (aOR 2.44, 95% CI = 1.13-5.25), but not with in-hospital mortality (aOR 1.31, 95% CI = 0.70-2.47). The most common reason for noncompliance was a prolonged duration reaching the target temperature (n = 33, 58.7%). The number of phases of non-compliant was not significantly associated with in-hospital mortality or poor neurological recovery.
Among cardiac arrest survivors undergoing TTM, those who did not receive TTM that in compliance with the protocol were more likely to experience poor neurological recovery than those whose TTM fully complied with the protocols. The most frequently identified deviation was a prolonged duration to reaching the target temperature.
已有的高质量目标温度管理(TTM)实施方案提供了关于冷却速率、维持时间和复温速度的指导。然而,是否符合 TTM 方案会导致存活率提高和更好的神经恢复,这一点尚未得到检验。
一项回顾性队列研究纳入了 2015 年至 2020 年期间在一家三级医疗中心因非创伤性成人心脏骤停幸存且预先存在的脑功能预后评分(CPC)为 1-2 的 1141 名幸存者。在这些幸存者中,进一步纳入了 330 名接受 TTM 的患者。排除了自发性低体温(<35°C)(n=107)和在 TTM 期间死亡的患者(n=21)。因此,共纳入了 202 名患者。110 名患者的 TTM 完全符合方案(方案符合组),但 92 名患者在某种程度上偏离了方案(方案不符合组)。
方案符合组和方案不符合组分别有 50 名(50%)和 46 名(50%)患者未存活至出院。在方案符合组中,42 名(38.2%)患者的神经恢复良好,而方案不符合组中为 32 名(34.8%)。在调整了年龄、初始可除颤节律、目击者倒地和心肺复苏持续时间后,方案不符合与不良神经结局相关(调整后比值比[aOR] 2.44,95%置信区间[CI]:1.13-5.25),但与院内死亡率无关(aOR 1.31,95% CI:0.70-2.47)。最常见的不符合原因是达到目标温度的持续时间延长(n=33,58.7%)。不符合的阶段数与院内死亡率或不良神经恢复无显著相关性。
在接受 TTM 的心脏骤停幸存者中,与 TTM 完全符合方案的患者相比,不符合方案的患者更有可能出现不良的神经恢复。最常见的不符合是达到目标温度的持续时间延长。