Bell Sarah, Smith Kenneth, Kim Haeyon, Orellana Taylor, Harinath Lakshmi, Rush Shannon, Olawaiye Alexander, Lesnock Jamie
Gynecologic Oncology, Magee Womens Hospital of UPMC, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2024 Dec 2;34(12):1898-1905. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2024-005658.
Routine lymph node assessment in patients with endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia is institution and surgeon-dependent without clear guidelines. We sought to determine if routine sentinel lymph node (SLN) dissection at the time of laparoscopic hysterectomy for patients with a preoperative diagnosis of endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia and a preoperative ultrasound with endometrial stripe ≥20 mm is cost-effective.
A decision model was created to perform two cost-effectiveness analyses: (1) hysterectomy with frozen section versus hysterectomy with SLN dissection in patients with a preoperative diagnosis of endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia and an endometrial stripe of 20 mm or greater, and (2) the same options in all patients with a preoperative diagnosis of endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia. Costs obtained from Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and event probabilities and quality of life utility values were obtained through literature review.
In the case of preoperative endometrial stripe ≥20 mm, hysterectomy with SLN dissection cost $2469 more than hysterectomy with frozen section and gained 0.010 quality adjusted life years, or $44,997/quality-adjusted life years gained. In one-way sensitivity analyses, SLN dissection remained the favored strategy at a willingness to pay threshold of $100,000/quality-adjusted life years unless chronic lower extremity lymphedema after full lymphadenectomy had a likelihood <13.1% (base case value 18.1%); otherwise, SLN dissection was favored with individual variation of all other parameters over plausible ranges. When considering all patients with endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia, hysterectomy with frozen section was favored, with results most sensitive to variation of lymphedema risk after full lymphadenectomy.
Hysterectomy with SLN dissection in patients with a preoperative endometrial stripe ≥20mm on ultrasound is cost-effective when compared with hysterectomy with frozen section.
对于子宫内膜上皮内瘤变患者,常规的淋巴结评估因机构和外科医生而异,且缺乏明确的指导原则。我们试图确定,对于术前诊断为子宫内膜上皮内瘤变且术前超声显示子宫内膜厚度≥20mm的患者,在腹腔镜子宫切除术中进行常规前哨淋巴结(SLN)清扫是否具有成本效益。
创建一个决策模型以进行两项成本效益分析:(1)术前诊断为子宫内膜上皮内瘤变且子宫内膜厚度为20mm或更厚的患者,行子宫切除术加冰冻切片检查与行子宫切除术加SLN清扫的比较;(2)所有术前诊断为子宫内膜上皮内瘤变的患者的相同选项比较。从医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心获取成本,并通过文献综述获得事件概率和生活质量效用值。
在术前子宫内膜厚度≥20mm的情况下,行子宫切除术加SLN清扫比行子宫切除术加冰冻切片检查多花费2469美元,但获得了0.010个质量调整生命年,即每获得一个质量调整生命年花费44,997美元。在单向敏感性分析中,除非全淋巴结清扫术后慢性下肢淋巴水肿的发生率<13.1%(基础病例值为18.1%),否则在前瞻性支付阈值为100,000美元/质量调整生命年时,SLN清扫仍是首选策略;否则,在所有其他参数在合理范围内存在个体差异的情况下,SLN清扫更受青睐。当考虑所有子宫内膜上皮内瘤变患者时,行子宫切除术加冰冻切片检查更受青睐,结果对全淋巴结清扫术后淋巴水肿风险的变化最为敏感。
与子宫切除术加冰冻切片检查相比,对于术前超声显示子宫内膜厚度≥20mm的患者,行子宫切除术加SLN清扫具有成本效益。