Suppr超能文献

《皮珀-祖尔科夫斯基压疮知识量表中文繁体版信度测试:心理测量学评估》。

Traditional Chinese-version reliability test of the Pieper-Zulkowski pressure ulcer knowledge: Psychometric and assessment.

机构信息

Department of Nursing, Asia University, Taichung, Taiwan.

Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Hualien, Taiwan.

出版信息

Int Wound J. 2024 Aug;21(8):e70017. doi: 10.1111/iwj.70017.

Abstract

This study was to translate the Pieper-Zulkowski pressure ulcer knowledge test (PZ-PUKT) into Traditional Chinese and evaluate its psychometric properties as well as identify the predictors of knowledge on pressure injury. The PZ-PUKT was translated into Traditional Chinese (TC-PZ-PUKT), and its content validity was evaluated. A total of 296 nurses participated in this study and completed the 72-item TC-PZ-PUKT online. The reliability of the TC-PZ-PUKT was analysed by evaluating its internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Hierarchical regression was used to determine factors associated with TC-PZ-PUKT scores. Content validity was achieved with a score of 0.986. Internal consistency was observed to be reliable, with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.858. The mean knowledge score on the TC-PZ-PUKT was 72.5%, with a 1-week test-retest reliability of r = 0.849. Education level, certification as a wound specialist and self-learning through reading articles, books or guidelines on pressure injury were significantly associated with TC-PZ-PUKT scores. The TC-PZ-PUKT is a valid and reliable tool. Education level, certification as a wound specialist and self-learning regarding pressure injury are related to knowledge of pressure injury.

摘要

本研究旨在将 Pieper-Zulkowski 压疮知识测试(PZ-PUKT)翻译成繁体中文,并评估其心理测量学特性以及识别压疮知识的预测因素。PZ-PUKT 被翻译成繁体中文(TC-PZ-PUKT),并评估其内容效度。共有 296 名护士参与了这项研究,并在线完成了 72 项 TC-PZ-PUKT。通过评估内部一致性和重测信度来分析 TC-PZ-PUKT 的可靠性。分层回归用于确定与 TC-PZ-PUKT 分数相关的因素。内容效度达到 0.986。内部一致性被认为是可靠的,Cronbach's alpha 为 0.858。TC-PZ-PUKT 的平均知识得分是 72.5%,重测信度为 r=0.849。教育水平、伤口专家认证以及通过阅读文章、书籍或压疮指南进行自我学习与 TC-PZ-PUKT 得分显著相关。TC-PZ-PUKT 是一种有效且可靠的工具。教育水平、伤口专家认证以及自我学习与压疮知识有关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/203d/11303260/2eb67af521d1/IWJ-21-e70017-g001.jpg

相似文献

2
Validity and Reliability of the Pieper-Zulkowski Pressure Ulcer Knowledge Test for Use in Turkey.
Adv Skin Wound Care. 2024 Mar 1;37(3):1-5. doi: 10.1097/ASW.0000000000000106.
3
Investigating the Psychometric Properties of the Pieper-Zulkowski Pressure Ulcer Knowledge Test among Nurses in Iran.
Adv Skin Wound Care. 2021 Mar 1;34(3):1-6. doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000732744.23554.0c.
4
The Pieper-Zulkowski pressure ulcer knowledge test.
Adv Skin Wound Care. 2014 Sep;27(9):413-9. doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000453210.21330.00.
7
Cultural adaptation of the Pieper-Zulkowski Pressure Ulcer Knowledge Test for use in Brazil.
Rev Bras Enferm. 2018 Jul-Aug;71(4):1977-1984. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2017-0029.
8
Assessing Pressure Injury Knowledge Using the Pieper-Zulkowski Pressure Ulcer Knowledge Test.
Adv Skin Wound Care. 2018 Sep;31(9):406-412. doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000540071.45158.29.
10
Pressure Injury Knowledge in Critical Care Nurses.
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2017 Sep/Oct;44(5):455-457. doi: 10.1097/WON.0000000000000350.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessment of nurses' level of knowledge of the management of chronic wounds.
Nurse Educ Today. 2024 Mar;134:106084. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2023.106084. Epub 2023 Dec 27.
2
Critical care nurses' knowledge and attitudes toward pressure injury prevention: A pre and post intervention study.
Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2023 Dec;79:103528. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2023.103528. Epub 2023 Aug 19.
3
Dataset on nurses' knowledge, attitude and practice in pressure injury prevention at Sabah, Malaysia.
Data Brief. 2023 Apr 28;48:109193. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2023.109193. eCollection 2023 Jun.
4
Investigating the Psychometric Properties of the Pieper-Zulkowski Pressure Ulcer Knowledge Test among Nurses in Iran.
Adv Skin Wound Care. 2021 Mar 1;34(3):1-6. doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000732744.23554.0c.
5
Nurses' Knowledge and Attitudes towards Prevention of Pressure Ulcers.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 10;18(4):1705. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18041705.
6
A systematic and psychometric review of tests measuring nurses' wound care knowledge.
Int Wound J. 2020 Oct;17(5):1209-1224. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13417. Epub 2020 Jun 4.
9
The Effect of Pressure Injury Training for Nurses: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Adv Skin Wound Care. 2020 Mar;33(3):1-11. doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000653164.21235.27.
10
Nurses' knowledge and practice of pressure ulcer prevention and treatment: An observational study.
J Tissue Viability. 2019 Nov;28(4):210-217. doi: 10.1016/j.jtv.2019.10.005. Epub 2019 Oct 25.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验