Comendador Pablo, Santamaria Laura, Amutio Maider, Alvarez Jon, Olazar Martin, Lopez Gartzen
Department of Chemical Engineering, University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, Barrio Sarriena s/n, Leioa, 48940, Spain.
Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, Nieves Cano 12, Vitoria-Gasteiz, 01006, Spain.
Energy Fuels. 2024 Jul 18;38(15):14402-14413. doi: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.4c02555. eCollection 2024 Aug 1.
Biomass Fast Pyrolysis and in line Steam Reforming (PY-SR) is promising alternative for H production. However, there are potential strategies for intensifying the process, such as capturing the CO in situ in the reforming step, which is so-called Sorption Enhanced Steam Reforming (SESR). Both PY-SR and PY-SESR were simulated using a thermodynamic approach and empirical correlations, and they were compared based on the energy requirements, H production, and H purity at different temperatures (500-800 °C) and steam to biomass (S/B) ratios (0-4). Then, the energy requirements for the PY-SESR were analyzed in detail for a reforming temperature of 600 °C and several S/B ratios, and a heat integration scheme was proposed, aiming at making the process thermally autosustained. Although the energy requirement of PY-SESR is always higher than that of PY-SR at the same reforming conditions, it allows the use of milder operating conditions, with the process performance being even better. Thus, PY-SESR outshines PY-SR, as it allows obtaining a higher H production (0.124 kg kg vs 0.118 kg kg ) and H purity (98 mol % vs 67 mol %), with a lower energy requirement, and capturing the CO generated, thereby attaining negative emissions. The main energy demands of this process account for water evaporation and sorbent calcination. Nevertheless, a thermally autosustained PY-SESR process may be attained by recovering heat from the product streams, transferring heat from the reforming reactor to the pyrolysis reactor, and burning the char generated in the pyrolysis step.
生物质快速热解与在线蒸汽重整(PY-SR)是制氢的一种有前景的替代方法。然而,存在强化该过程的潜在策略,例如在重整步骤中原位捕获CO,即所谓的吸附增强蒸汽重整(SESR)。使用热力学方法和经验关联式对PY-SR和PY-SESR进行了模拟,并基于不同温度(500-800℃)和蒸汽与生物质(S/B)比(0-4)下的能量需求、产氢量和氢气纯度进行了比较。然后,详细分析了重整温度为600℃和几个S/B比时PY-SESR的能量需求,并提出了一种热集成方案,旨在使该过程实现热自维持。尽管在相同的重整条件下,PY-SESR的能量需求总是高于PY-SR,但它允许采用更温和的操作条件,且过程性能更好。因此,PY-SESR优于PY-SR,因为它能够获得更高的产氢量(0.124 kg/kg对0.118 kg/kg)和氢气纯度(98 mol%对67 mol%),能量需求更低,并捕获产生的CO,从而实现负排放。该过程的主要能量需求在于水蒸发和吸附剂煅烧。然而,通过从产品流中回收热量、将热量从重整反应器传递到热解反应器以及燃烧热解步骤中产生的焦炭,可以实现热自维持的PY-SESR过程。