• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

干预时机对健康相关假新闻的影响:模拟研究

Effects of Intervention Timing on Health-Related Fake News: Simulation Study.

作者信息

Gwon Nahyun, Jeong Wonjeong, Kim Jee Hyun, Oh Kyoung Hee, Jun Jae Kwan

机构信息

Cancer Knowledge and Information Center, National Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

JMIR Form Res. 2024 Aug 7;8:e48284. doi: 10.2196/48284.

DOI:10.2196/48284
PMID:39109788
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11339565/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Fake health-related news has spread rapidly through the internet, causing harm to individuals and society. Despite interventions, a fenbendazole scandal recently spread among patients with lung cancer in South Korea. It is crucial to intervene appropriately to prevent the spread of fake news.

OBJECTIVE

This study investigated the appropriate timing of interventions to minimize the side effects of fake news.

METHODS

A simulation was conducted using the susceptible-infected-recovered (SIR) model, which is a representative model of the virus spread mechanism. We applied this model to the fake news spread mechanism. The parameters were set similarly to those in the digital environment, where the fenbendazole scandal occurred. NetLogo, an agent-based model, was used as the analytical tool.

RESULTS

Fake news lasted 278 days in the absence of interventions. As a result of adjusting and analyzing the timing of the intervention in response to the fenbendazole scandal, we found that faster intervention leads to a shorter duration of fake news (intervention at 54 days = fake news that lasted for 210 days; intervention at 16 days = fake news that lasted for 187 days; and intervention at 10 days = fake news that lasted for 157 days). However, no significant differences were observed when the intervention was performed within 10 days.

CONCLUSIONS

Interventions implemented within 10 days were effective in reducing the duration of the spread of fake news. Our findings suggest that timely intervention is critical for preventing the spread of fake news in the digital environment. Additionally, a monitoring system that can detect fake news should be developed for a rapid response.

摘要

背景

与健康相关的虚假新闻通过互联网迅速传播,对个人和社会造成危害。尽管采取了干预措施,但最近韩国一种芬苯达唑丑闻在肺癌患者中蔓延。适当干预以防止虚假新闻传播至关重要。

目的

本研究调查了干预的合适时机,以尽量减少虚假新闻的副作用。

方法

使用易感-感染-康复(SIR)模型进行模拟,该模型是病毒传播机制的代表性模型。我们将此模型应用于虚假新闻传播机制。参数设置与芬苯达唑丑闻发生的数字环境中的参数类似。基于主体的模型NetLogo用作分析工具。

结果

在没有干预的情况下,虚假新闻持续了278天。作为针对芬苯达唑丑闻调整和分析干预时机的结果,我们发现更快的干预会导致虚假新闻持续时间缩短(在第54天干预 = 虚假新闻持续210天;在第16天干预 = 虚假新闻持续187天;在第10天干预 = 虚假新闻持续157天)。然而,在10天内进行干预时未观察到显著差异。

结论

在10天内实施的干预措施在减少虚假新闻传播持续时间方面是有效的。我们的研究结果表明,及时干预对于防止数字环境中虚假新闻的传播至关重要。此外,应开发一个能够检测虚假新闻的监测系统以便快速响应。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0d5/11339565/b10fc4fa3904/formative_v8i1e48284_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0d5/11339565/83e8b48bcd3b/formative_v8i1e48284_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0d5/11339565/53d335bfafe0/formative_v8i1e48284_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0d5/11339565/b10fc4fa3904/formative_v8i1e48284_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0d5/11339565/83e8b48bcd3b/formative_v8i1e48284_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0d5/11339565/53d335bfafe0/formative_v8i1e48284_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0d5/11339565/b10fc4fa3904/formative_v8i1e48284_fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
Effects of Intervention Timing on Health-Related Fake News: Simulation Study.干预时机对健康相关假新闻的影响:模拟研究
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Aug 7;8:e48284. doi: 10.2196/48284.
2
The Prevalence and Impact of Fake News on COVID-19 Vaccination in Taiwan: Retrospective Study of Digital Media.《台湾地区假新闻对 COVID-19 疫苗接种的流行与影响:数字媒体回溯性研究》
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Apr 26;24(4):e36830. doi: 10.2196/36830.
3
Ingraining Polio Vaccine Acceptance through Public Service Advertisements in the Digital Era: The Moderating Role of Misinformation, Disinformation, Fake News, and Religious Fatalism.通过数字时代的公益广告培养脊髓灰质炎疫苗接种意愿:错误信息、虚假信息、假新闻和宗教宿命论的调节作用
Vaccines (Basel). 2022 Oct 17;10(10):1733. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10101733.
4
Fake news, disinformation and misinformation in social media: a review.社交媒体中的假新闻、虚假信息与错误信息:综述
Soc Netw Anal Min. 2023;13(1):30. doi: 10.1007/s13278-023-01028-5. Epub 2023 Feb 9.
5
Fake news in the age of COVID-19: evolutional and psychobiological considerations.新冠疫情时代的假新闻:进化和心理生物学方面的考虑。
Psychiatriki. 2022 Sep 19;33(3):183-186. doi: 10.22365/jpsych.2022.087. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
6
Modeling the spread of fake news on Twitter.在 Twitter 上模拟假新闻的传播。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 22;16(4):e0250419. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250419. eCollection 2021.
7
Fake news, influencers and health-related professional participation on the Web: A pilot study on a social-network of people with Multiple Sclerosis.假新闻、网红和与健康相关的专业人士在网络上的参与:多发性硬化症患者社交网络的初步研究。
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2018 Oct;25:175-178. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2018.07.046. Epub 2018 Jul 31.
8
A digital media literacy intervention for older adults improves resilience to fake news.一项针对老年人的数字媒体素养干预措施可提高其对虚假新闻的抵御能力。
Sci Rep. 2022 Apr 9;12(1):6008. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-08437-0.
9
The geography of corporate fake news.企业假新闻的地理学。
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 17;19(4):e0301364. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301364. eCollection 2024.
10
Epidemic modeling for misinformation spread in digital networks through a social intelligence approach.通过社会智能方法对数字网络中错误信息传播的疫情建模。
Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 17;14(1):19100. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-69657-0.

本文引用的文献

1
Informed public against false rumor in the social media era: Focusing on social media dependency.在社交媒体时代让公众了解真相以抵制虚假谣言:关注对社交媒体的依赖
Telemat Inform. 2018 Aug;35(5):1071-1081. doi: 10.1016/j.tele.2017.12.017. Epub 2017 Dec 24.
2
Fake news, disinformation and misinformation in social media: a review.社交媒体中的假新闻、虚假信息与错误信息:综述
Soc Netw Anal Min. 2023;13(1):30. doi: 10.1007/s13278-023-01028-5. Epub 2023 Feb 9.
3
How cancer patients get fake cancer information: From TV to YouTube, a qualitative study focusing on fenbendazole scandle.
癌症患者如何获取虚假癌症信息:从电视到YouTube,一项聚焦芬苯达唑丑闻的定性研究
Front Oncol. 2022 Oct 28;12:942045. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.942045. eCollection 2022.
4
Understanding the Social Mechanism of Cancer Misinformation Spread on YouTube and Lessons Learned: Infodemiological Study.理解 YouTube 上癌症错误信息传播的社会机制及相关教训:信息流行病学研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Nov 14;24(11):e39571. doi: 10.2196/39571.
5
An Agent-Based Model of the Local Spread of SARS-CoV-2: Modeling Study.一种基于主体的新型冠状病毒2型(SARS-CoV-2)局部传播模型:建模研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2021 Apr 6;9(4):e24192. doi: 10.2196/24192.
6
Panic During COVID-19 Pandemic! A Qualitative Investigation Into the Psychosocial Experiences of a Sample of Indian People.新冠疫情期间的恐慌!对一群印度人的社会心理体验的定性调查。
Front Psychol. 2020 Oct 15;11:575491. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.575491. eCollection 2020.
7
Analytical features of the SIR model and their applications to COVID-19.SIR模型的分析特征及其在COVID-19中的应用。
Appl Math Model. 2021 Feb;90:466-473. doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2020.08.057. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
8
COVID-19-Related Infodemic and Its Impact on Public Health: A Global Social Media Analysis.新冠疫情相关信息泛滥及其对公共卫生的影响:全球社交媒体分析。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2020 Oct;103(4):1621-1629. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.20-0812.
9
Gossip, Rumors, and the COVID-19 Crisis.流言蜚语与新冠疫情危机
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2020 Aug;14(4):e29-e30. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2020.272. Epub 2020 Jul 27.
10
Cross-Country Comparison of Public Awareness, Rumors, and Behavioral Responses to the COVID-19 Epidemic: Infodemiology Study.新冠疫情公众认知、谣言及行为反应的跨国比较:信息流行病学研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Aug 3;22(8):e21143. doi: 10.2196/21143.