Silverman Wendy K, Pettit Jeremy W, Jaccard James
Child Study Center, Yale University School of Medicine.
Department of Psychology and Center for Children and Families, Florida International University.
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2024 Sep-Oct;53(5):840-848. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2024.2384035. Epub 2024 Aug 7.
We call for clinical trials researchers to carefully consider questions about use of intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis and per protocol analysis. We discuss how questions about are appropriately answered through the application of per protocol analysis. ITT analysis is well-suited and appropriate for addressing questions related to treatment , typically adherence to the treatment with respect to an outcome. While guided by admirable intentions, ITT analysis is often not guided by the right questions, leading to ITT misapplication. We address additional misconceptions that often lead to ITT misapplication, including issues relating to treatment noncompletion and violation of random assignment. We further highlight future directions and implications, particularly that future clinical child and adolescent research trial designs will be increasingly characterized by hybrid trials that combine elements of efficacy, effectiveness, and implementation research, where ITT and per protocol analysis will be appropriately applied to answer the right questions.
我们呼吁临床试验研究人员仔细考虑有关意向性分析(ITT)和符合方案分析的问题。我们讨论了如何通过应用符合方案分析来恰当地回答这些问题。ITT分析非常适合并适用于解决与治疗相关的问题,通常是关于某种结局的治疗依从性。虽然ITT分析的初衷值得赞赏,但它往往没有以正确的问题为导向,导致ITT分析被错误应用。我们还探讨了其他常常导致ITT分析被错误应用的误解,包括与治疗未完成和违反随机分配相关的问题。我们进一步强调了未来的方向和影响,特别是未来儿童和青少年临床研究试验设计将越来越以结合疗效、有效性和实施研究要素的混合试验为特征,在这些试验中,ITT分析和符合方案分析将被适当地应用于回答正确的问题。