Silva-Luna César, Villarreal-Ríos Enrique, Galicia-Rodríguez Liliana, Rosas-Marín Laura Estefanía, Franco-Saldaña Mireya, Guerrero-Mancer Mariana Del Rayo, Sandoval-Barajas Juana Liliana, Silva-Nuñez Arturo
Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Unidad de Medicina Familiar No. 49, Servicio de Medicina Familiar. Celaya, Guanajuato, México.
Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Órgano de Operación Administrativa Desconcentrada Querétaro, Unidad de Investigación Epidemiológica y en Servicios de Salud. Querétaro, Querétaro, México.
Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2024 Jan 8;62(1):1-7. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10278140.
The medical care paradigm is face-to-face; however, technological development has led to the digital modality.
To determine cost-effectiveness of digital care and face-to-face care at the first level of care.
Cost-effectiveness study. 2 groups were integrated: the digital service and the face-to-face service. The sample size was calculated with the percentage formula for 2 groups, and the result was 217 per group. The effectiveness was evaluated in 3 dimensions: the satisfaction of the patient, of the doctor and of the medical assistant. In all 3 cases the Visual analogue scale was used. The cost corresponded to the fixed unit cost estimated with the technique of times and movements adjusted for the duration of care. The statistical analysis included averages, percentages and cost-effectiveness ratio.
The cost of digital attention is $343.83 and face-to-face attention is $171.91 (all estimated in Mexican pesos). From the patient's perspective, the effectiveness in digital care is $9.47 and in face-to-face is $9.25. The cost to reach effectiveness of 10 in face-to-face care is $185.85 and in digital care $363.20. From the physician's perspective, the cost to achieve effectiveness of 10 is $419.13 in digital care and $184.52 in face-to-face care. From the perspective of the medical assistant, to achieve effectiveness of 10, the cost in digital care is $468.43 and in face-to-face $179.83.
Currently, the best cost-effectiveness ratio corresponds to face-to-face care; however, digital care is an option that will have to evolve.
医疗护理模式是面对面的;然而,技术发展催生了数字模式。
确定一级护理中数字护理和面对面护理的成本效益。
成本效益研究。分为两组:数字服务组和面对面服务组。样本量用两组的百分比公式计算,结果每组217例。从三个维度评估有效性:患者满意度、医生满意度和医疗助理满意度。在所有三种情况下均使用视觉模拟量表。成本对应于用时间和动作技术估算的固定单位成本,并根据护理持续时间进行调整。统计分析包括平均值、百分比和成本效益比。
数字护理成本为343.83美元,面对面护理成本为171.91美元(均以墨西哥比索估算)。从患者角度看,数字护理的有效性为9.47美元,面对面护理为9.25美元。在面对面护理中达到有效性10的成本为185.85美元,数字护理为363.20美元。从医生角度看,在数字护理中达到有效性10的成本为419.13美元,面对面护理为184.52美元。从医疗助理角度看,要达到有效性10,数字护理的成本为468.43美元,面对面护理为179.83美元。
目前,最佳成本效益比对应于面对面护理;然而,数字护理是一个有待发展的选择。