Suppr超能文献

在 MAGNITUDE 三期研究中,对基线特征的不平衡进行调整,证实了尼拉帕利联合醋酸阿比特龙加泼尼松在转移性前列腺癌患者中的临床获益。

Adjustment for imbalances in baseline characteristics in the MAGNITUDE phase 3 study confirms the clinical benefit of niraparib in combination with abiraterone acetate plus prednisone in patients with metastatic prostate cancer.

机构信息

Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France.

University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK.

出版信息

Eur J Cancer. 2024 Sep;209:114183. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2024.114183. Epub 2024 Jun 17.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

MAGNITUDE (NCT03748641) demonstrated favourable outcomes with niraparib plus abiraterone acetate plus prednisone (+AAP) versus placebo+AAP in patients with BRCA1/2-altered metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Imbalances in prognostic variables were reported between arms, which impacts estimation of both the clinical benefit and cost‑effectiveness of niraparib+AAP for healthcare systems. A pre-specified multivariable analysis (MVA) demonstrated improved overall survival (OS) with niraparib+AAP. Here, we used an inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) model to adjust for covariate imbalances and assess time-to-event outcomes.

METHODS

IPTW analysis of time-to-event outcomes was conducted using data from patients with BRCA1/2-altered mCRPC (N = 225) in MAGNITUDE. Patients received niraparib+AAP or placebo+AAP. OS, radiographic progression-free survival, time to symptomatic progression, time to initiation of cytotoxic chemotherapy and time to prostate-specific antigen progression were assessed. Weighted Kaplan-Meier curves were generated for each endpoint, and adjusted hazard ratios (HR) were obtained from a weighted Cox model.

RESULTS

Improvements in survival outcomes were estimated for niraparib+AAP versus placebo+AAP: unadjusted median OS was 30.4 months versus 28.6 months, respectively (HR: 0.79; 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.55, 1.12; p = 0.183). Following IPTW, median OS increased to 34.1 months with niraparib+AAP versus a decrease to 27.4 with placebo (HR: 0.65; 95 % CI: 0.46, 0.93; p = 0.017). Similar improvements were observed for other time-to-event endpoints.

CONCLUSIONS

IPTW adjustment provided a more precise estimate of the clinical benefit of niraparib+AAP versus placebo+AAP in patients with BRCA1/2-altered mCRPC. Results were consistent with the pre-specified MVA, and further demonstrated the value of adjusting for baseline imbalances, particularly in smaller studies.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT03748641 (MAGNITUDE).

摘要

背景

MAGNITUDE(NCT03748641)研究表明,与安慰剂+AAP 相比,尼拉帕利+醋酸阿比特龙+泼尼松(+AAP)在 BRCA1/2 改变的转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌(mCRPC)患者中具有更好的疗效。报告称,各治疗组之间存在预后变量的不平衡,这会影响对尼拉帕利+AAP 治疗方案的临床获益和成本效益的估计,对于医疗保健系统而言。一项预设的多变量分析(MVA)表明,尼拉帕利+AAP 可改善总生存期(OS)。在这里,我们使用逆概率治疗加权(IPTW)模型来调整协变量的不平衡,并评估时间事件结局。

方法

使用 MAGNITUDE 中 BRCA1/2 改变的 mCRPC 患者(N=225)的数据进行时间事件结局的 IPTW 分析。患者接受尼拉帕利+AAP 或安慰剂+AAP 治疗。评估 OS、影像学无进展生存期、症状进展时间、细胞毒性化疗开始时间和前列腺特异性抗原进展时间。为每个终点生成加权 Kaplan-Meier 曲线,并从加权 Cox 模型获得调整后的危险比(HR)。

结果

与安慰剂+AAP 相比,尼拉帕利+AAP 组的生存结局得到了改善:未经调整的中位 OS 分别为 30.4 个月和 28.6 个月(HR:0.79;95%置信区间[CI]:0.55,1.12;p=0.183)。在 IPTW 后,尼拉帕利+AAP 组的中位 OS 增加至 34.1 个月,而安慰剂组则降至 27.4 个月(HR:0.65;95%CI:0.46,0.93;p=0.017)。其他时间事件终点也观察到类似的改善。

结论

IPTW 调整提供了尼拉帕利+AAP 与安慰剂+AAP 相比在 BRCA1/2 改变的 mCRPC 患者中的临床获益的更精确估计。结果与预设的 MVA 一致,并进一步表明调整基线不平衡的价值,特别是在较小的研究中。

试验注册

NCT03748641(MAGNITUDE)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验