Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Athens Medical Center, Dept of GU Oncology, Athens, Greece.
Lancet Oncol. 2021 Nov;22(11):1541-1559. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00402-2. Epub 2021 Sep 30.
The majority of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) will have disease progression of a uniformly fatal disease. mCRPC is driven by both activated androgen receptors and elevated intratumoural androgens; however, the current standard of care is therapy that targets a single androgen signalling mechanism. We aimed to investigate the combination treatment using apalutamide plus abiraterone acetate, each of which suppresses the androgen signalling axis in a different way, versus standard care in mCRPC.
ACIS was a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase 3 study done at 167 hospitals in 17 countries in the USA, Canada, Mexico, Europe, the Asia-Pacific region, Africa, and South America. We included chemotherapy-naive men (aged ≥18 years) with mCRPC who had not been previously treated with androgen biosynthesis signalling inhibitors and were receiving ongoing androgen deprivation therapy, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1, and a Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form question 3 (ie, worst pain in the past 24 h) score of 3 or lower. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) via a centralised interactive web response system with a permuted block randomisation scheme (block size 4) to oral apalutamide 240 mg once daily plus oral abiraterone acetate 1000 mg once daily and oral prednisone 5 mg twice daily (apalutamide plus abiraterone-prednisone group) or placebo plus abiraterone acetate and prednisone (abiraterone-prednisone group), in 28-day treatment cycles. Randomisation was stratified by presence or absence of visceral metastases, ECOG performance status, and geographical region. Patients, the investigators, study team, and the sponsor were masked to group assignments. An independent data-monitoring committee continually monitored data to ensure ongoing patient safety, and reviewed efficacy data. The primary endpoint was radiographic progression-free survival assessed in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was reported for all patients who received at least one dose of study drug. This study is completed and no longer recruiting and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02257736.
982 men were enrolled and randomly assigned from Dec 10, 2014 to Aug 30, 2016 (492 to apalutamide plus abiraterone-prednisone; 490 to abiraterone-prednisone). At the primary analysis (median follow-up 25·7 months [IQR 23·0-28·9]), median radiographic progression-free survival was 22·6 months (95% CI 19·4-27·4) in the apalutamide plus abiraterone-prednisone group versus 16·6 months (13·9-19·3) in the abiraterone-prednisone group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·69, 95% CI 0·58-0·83; p<0·0001). At the updated analysis (final analysis for overall survival; median follow-up 54·8 months [IQR 51·5-58·4]), median radiographic progression-free survival was 24·0 months (95% CI 19·7-27·5) versus 16·6 months (13·9-19·3; HR 0·70, 95% CI 0·60-0·83; p<0·0001). The most common grade 3-4 treatment-emergent adverse event was hypertension (82 [17%] of 490 patients receiving apalutamide plus abiraterone-prednisone and 49 [10%] of 489 receiving abiraterone-prednisone). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 195 (40%) patients receiving apalutamide plus abiraterone-prednisone and 181 (37%) patients receiving abiraterone-prednisone. Drug-related treatment-emergent adverse events with fatal outcomes occurred in three (1%) patients in the apalutamide plus abiraterone-prednisone group (2 pulmonary embolism, 1 cardiac failure) and five (1%) patients in the abiraterone-prednisone group (1 cardiac failure and 1 cardiac arrest, 1 mesenteric arterial occlusion, 1 seizure, and 1 sudden death).
Despite the use of an active and established therapy as the comparator, apalutamide plus abiraterone-prednisone improved radiographic progression-free survival. Additional studies to identify subgroups of patients who might benefit the most from combination therapy are needed to further refine the treatment of mCRPC.
Janssen Research & Development.
大多数转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌(mCRPC)患者的疾病进展均为致命性疾病。mCRPC 由激活的雄激素受体和肿瘤内升高的雄激素驱动;然而,目前的标准治疗方法是针对单一雄激素信号机制的治疗。我们旨在研究阿帕鲁胺联合醋酸阿比特龙的联合治疗方法,这两种药物分别以不同的方式抑制雄激素信号轴,与 mCRPC 中的标准治疗相比。
ACIS 是一项随机、安慰剂对照、双盲、III 期研究,在美国、加拿大、墨西哥、欧洲、亚太地区、非洲和南美洲的 167 家医院进行。我们纳入了化疗初治的 mCRPC 男性患者(年龄≥18 岁),这些患者以前未接受过雄激素生物合成信号抑制剂治疗,且正在接受持续的雄激素剥夺治疗,ECOG 体能状态为 0 或 1,且简明疼痛量表-短表问题 3(即过去 24 小时内最严重的疼痛)评分为 3 或更低。患者通过中央交互式网络应答系统以区组随机化(区组大小为 4)按 1:1 的比例随机分配至口服阿帕鲁胺 240mg 每日一次联合口服醋酸阿比特龙 1000mg 每日一次和口服泼尼松 5mg 每日两次(阿帕鲁胺联合醋酸阿比特龙-泼尼松组)或安慰剂联合醋酸阿比特龙和泼尼松(醋酸阿比特龙-泼尼松组),治疗周期为 28 天。随机分组按是否存在内脏转移、ECOG 体能状态和地理位置进行分层。患者、研究者、研究团队和赞助商对分组情况均设盲。一个独立的数据监测委员会持续监测数据以确保患者的安全性,并审查疗效数据。主要终点是在意向治疗人群中评估的影像学无进展生存期。报告了至少接受一剂研究药物的所有患者的安全性。该研究已完成,不再招募,在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册,编号为 NCT02257736。
2014 年 12 月 10 日至 2016 年 8 月 30 日期间,共纳入 982 名患者并进行随机分组(阿帕鲁胺联合醋酸阿比特龙-泼尼松组 492 名,醋酸阿比特龙-泼尼松组 490 名)。在主要分析(中位随访 25.7 个月[IQR 23.0-28.9])时,阿帕鲁胺联合醋酸阿比特龙-泼尼松组的中位影像学无进展生存期为 22.6 个月(95%CI 19.4-27.4),而醋酸阿比特龙-泼尼松组为 16.6 个月(13.9-19.3)(风险比[HR]0.69,95%CI 0.58-0.83;p<0.0001)。在更新分析(总生存的最终分析;中位随访 54.8 个月[IQR 51.5-58.4])时,中位影像学无进展生存期为 24.0 个月(95%CI 19.7-27.5)与 16.6 个月(13.9-19.3;HR 0.70,95%CI 0.60-0.83;p<0.0001)。最常见的 3-4 级治疗相关不良事件是高血压(阿帕鲁胺联合醋酸阿比特龙-泼尼松组 490 名患者中有 82 名[17%],醋酸阿比特龙-泼尼松组 489 名患者中有 49 名[10%])。阿帕鲁胺联合醋酸阿比特龙-泼尼松组有 195 名(40%)患者和醋酸阿比特龙-泼尼松组有 181 名(37%)患者发生严重的治疗相关不良事件。阿帕鲁胺联合醋酸阿比特龙-泼尼松组有 3 名(1%)患者和醋酸阿比特龙-泼尼松组有 5 名(1%)患者发生药物相关的治疗相关不良事件,导致死亡(阿帕鲁胺联合醋酸阿比特龙-泼尼松组 2 例肺栓塞,1 例心力衰竭;醋酸阿比特龙-泼尼松组 1 例心力衰竭和 1 例心脏骤停,1 例肠系膜动脉闭塞,1 例癫痫发作,1 例猝死)。
尽管使用了一种活性且已确立的治疗方法作为对照,但阿帕鲁胺联合醋酸阿比特龙-泼尼松改善了影像学无进展生存期。需要进一步研究以确定可能从联合治疗中获益最大的亚组患者,从而进一步完善 mCRPC 的治疗。
Janssen Research & Development。