Lasheras-Pérez M A, Taberner R, Martínez-Jarreta B
Servicios de Dermatología, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico la Fe, Valencia, Spain.
Unidad de Dermatología, Hospital Universitari Son Llàtzer, Palma de Mallorca, Spain.
Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2024 Oct;115(9):T867-T882. doi: 10.1016/j.ad.2024.08.005. Epub 2024 Aug 5.
Both the functions and equipment of dermatologists have increased over the past few years, some examples being cosmetic dermatology, artificial intelligence, tele-dermatology, and social media, which added to the pharmaceutical industry and cosmetic selling has become a source of bioethical conflicts. The objective of this narrative review is to identify the bioethical conflicts of everyday dermatology practice and highlight the proposed solutions. Therefore, we conducted searches across PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus databases. Also, the main Spanish and American deontological codes of physicians and dermatologists have been revised. The authors recommend declaring all conflicts of interest while respecting the patients' autonomy, confidentiality, and privacy. Cosmetic dermatology, cosmetic selling, artificial intelligence, tele-dermatology, and social media are feasible as long as the same standards of conventional dermatology are applied. Nonetheless, the deontological codes associated with these innovations need to be refurbished.
在过去几年里，皮肤科医生的职能和设备都有所增加，比如美容皮肤科、人工智能、远程皮肤病学和社交媒体，这些与制药行业和化妆品销售相结合，已成为生物伦理冲突的一个来源。本叙述性综述的目的是识别日常皮肤科实践中的生物伦理冲突，并强调提出的解决方案。因此，我们在PubMed、科学网和Scopus数据库中进行了检索。此外，还修订了西班牙和美国主要的医生及皮肤科医生职业道德规范。作者建议在尊重患者自主权、保密性和隐私的同时，声明所有利益冲突。只要应用传统皮肤科的相同标准，美容皮肤科、化妆品销售、人工智能、远程皮肤病学和社交媒体就是可行的。尽管如此，与这些创新相关的职业道德规范需要翻新。
