Yong Courtney, Slaven James E, Wu Zhenjie, Margulis Vitaly, Djaladat Hooman, Antonelli Alessandro, Simone Giuseppe, Bhanvadia Raj, Ghoreifi Alireza, Moghaddam Farshad Sheybaee, Ditonno Francesco, Tuderti Gabriele, Bronimann Stephan, Dhanji Sohail, Eilender Benjamin, Franco Antonio, Finati Marco, Tozzi Marco, Helstrom Emma, Mendiola Dinno F, Amparore Daniele, Porpiglia Francesco, Moon Sol C, Rais-Bahrami Soroush, Derweesh Ithaar, Mehrazin Reza, Autorino Riccardo, Abdollah Firas, Ferro Matteo, Correa Andres, Singla Nirmish, Gonzalgo Mark L, Sundaram Chandru P
Indiana University Department of Urology, Indianapolis, IN.
Indiana University Department of Biostatistics and Health Data Science, Indianapolis, IN.
Urol Oncol. 2024 Nov;42(11):373.e1-373.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.06.001. Epub 2024 Aug 6.
We sought to determine whether bladder cuff excision and its technique influence outcomes after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC).
A multicenter, international, retrospective analysis using the ROBotic surgery for Upper tract Urothelial cancer Study (ROBUUST) 2.0 registry identified 1,718 patients undergoing RNU for UTUC between 2015 and 2023 at 17 centers across the United States, Europe, and Asia. Data was gathered on (1) whether bladder cuff excision was performed and (2) what technique was used, including formal excision or other techniques (pluck technique, stripping/intussusception technique) and outcomes. Multivariate and survival analyses were performed to compare the groups.
Most patients (90%, 1,540/1,718) underwent formal bladder cuff excision in accordance with EAU and AUA guidelines. Only 4% (68/1,718) underwent resection using other techniques, and 6% (110/1,718) did not have a bladder cuff excised. Median follow up for the cohort was 24 months (IQR 9-44). When comparing formal bladder cuff excision to other excision techniques, there were no differences in oncologic or survival outcomes including bladder recurrence-free survival (BRFS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), overall survival (OS), or cancer-specific survival (CSS). However, excision of any kind conferred a decreased risk of bladder-specific recurrence compared to no excision. There was no difference in RFS, MFS, OS, or CSS when comparing bladder cuff excision, other techniques, and no excision.
Bladder cuff excision improves recurrence-free survival, particularly when considering bladder recurrence. This benefit is conferred regardless of technique, as long as the intramural ureter and ureteral orifice are excised. However, the benefit of bladder cuff excision on metastasis-free, overall, and cancer-specific survival is unclear.
我们试图确定膀胱袖口切除术及其技术是否会对上尿路尿路上皮癌(UTUC)根治性肾输尿管切除术(RNU)后的结果产生影响。
一项多中心、国际性的回顾性分析,使用上尿路尿路上皮癌机器人手术研究(ROBUUST)2.0注册数据库,确定了2015年至2023年期间在美国、欧洲和亚洲的17个中心接受RNU治疗UTUC的1718例患者。收集了以下数据:(1)是否进行膀胱袖口切除术;(2)使用了何种技术,包括正规切除术或其他技术(摘取技术、剥离/套叠技术)以及结果。进行多变量和生存分析以比较各组。
大多数患者(90%,1540/1718)根据欧洲泌尿外科学会(EAU)和美国泌尿外科学会(AUA)指南进行了正规膀胱袖口切除术。只有4%(68/1718)的患者使用其他技术进行切除,6%(110/1718)的患者未进行膀胱袖口切除。该队列的中位随访时间为24个月(四分位间距9 - 44)。将正规膀胱袖口切除术与其他切除技术进行比较时,在肿瘤学或生存结果方面没有差异,包括无膀胱复发生存率(BRFS)、无复发生存率(RFS)、无转移生存率(MFS)、总生存率(OS)或癌症特异性生存率(CSS)。然而,与未切除相比,任何形式的切除都降低了膀胱特异性复发的风险。比较膀胱袖口切除术、其他技术和未切除时,RFS、MFS、OS或CSS没有差异。
膀胱袖口切除术可提高无复发生存率,尤其是考虑膀胱复发时。只要切除壁内输尿管和输尿管口,无论采用何种技术均可获得这一益处。然而,膀胱袖口切除术对无转移、总体和癌症特异性生存的益处尚不清楚。