• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Robotic surgery of the urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract single surgeon initial experience, 66 consecutive cases.机器人手术治疗上尿路尿路上皮癌:单外科医生的初步经验,66 例连续病例。
BMC Urol. 2024 Nov 1;24(1):238. doi: 10.1186/s12894-024-01629-y.
2
Surgical benchmarks, mid-term oncological outcomes, and impact of surgical team composition on simultaneous enbloc robot-assisted radical cystectomy and nephroureterectomy.手术基准、中期肿瘤学结果以及手术团队构成对机器人辅助同期整块根治性膀胱切除术和肾输尿管切除术的影响。
BMC Urol. 2021 Apr 28;21(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12894-021-00839-y.
3
Is Robotic Superior to Laparoscopic Approach for Radical Nephroureterectomy with Bladder Cuff Excision in Treating Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma?在治疗上尿路尿路上皮癌时,机器人辅助根治性肾输尿管切除术加膀胱袖状切除术是否优于腹腔镜手术?
J Endourol. 2023 Feb;37(2):139-146. doi: 10.1089/end.2022.0154. Epub 2022 Nov 18.
4
Robotic radical nephroureterectomy and segmental ureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a multi-institutional experience.机器人根治性肾输尿管切除术和节段性输尿管切除术治疗上尿路尿路上皮癌:多机构经验。
World J Urol. 2019 Nov;37(11):2303-2311. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02790-y. Epub 2019 May 6.
5
Oncologic Outcomes Following Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Nephroureterectomy with Bladder Cuff Excision for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma.机器人辅助腹腔镜肾输尿管切除术联合膀胱袖口切除术治疗上尿路尿路上皮癌后的肿瘤学结局
J Urol. 2015 Dec;194(6):1561-6. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.07.081. Epub 2015 Jul 17.
6
Robotic nephroureterectomy: a simplified approach requiring no patient repositioning or robot redocking.机器人肾盂输尿管切除术:一种简化的方法,无需患者重新定位或机器人重新对接。
Eur Urol. 2014 Oct;66(4):769-77. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.02.060. Epub 2014 Mar 12.
7
Outcomes of laparoscopic, robotic and open nephroureterectomy with bladder cuff excision in patients with T3T4 upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: a multi-center retrospective study.腹腔镜、机器人和开放性肾输尿管切除术联合膀胱袖套切除治疗 T3T4 期上尿路尿路上皮癌的疗效:一项多中心回顾性研究。
BMC Urol. 2024 Oct 21;24(1):231. doi: 10.1186/s12894-024-01622-5.
8
Robot-assisted versus open radical nephroureterectomy for urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract: A retrospective cohort study across ten years.机器人辅助与开放性根治性肾输尿管切除术治疗上尿路上皮癌:跨越十年的回顾性队列研究。
Surg Oncol. 2021 Sep;38:101607. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2021.101607. Epub 2021 May 16.
9
Robot-assisted nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: results from three high-volume robotic surgery institutions.机器人辅助肾盂输尿管癌根治术:来自三个高容量机器人手术机构的结果。
J Robot Surg. 2020 Feb;14(1):211-219. doi: 10.1007/s11701-019-00965-8. Epub 2019 Apr 30.
10
Oncological Outcomes of Laparoscopic Nephroureterectomy Versus Open Radical Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: An European Association of Urology Guidelines Systematic Review.腹腔镜肾输尿管切除术与开放根治性肾输尿管切除术治疗上尿路尿路上皮癌的肿瘤学结局:欧洲泌尿外科学会指南系统评价。
Eur Urol Focus. 2019 Mar;5(2):205-223. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2017.10.003. Epub 2017 Nov 15.

本文引用的文献

1
The impact of bladder cuff excision on outcomes after nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: An analysis of the ROBUUST 2.0 registry.膀胱袖口切除术对上尿路尿路上皮癌肾输尿管切除术后结局的影响:ROBUUST 2.0注册研究分析
Urol Oncol. 2024 Nov;42(11):373.e1-373.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.06.001. Epub 2024 Aug 6.
2
Robotic distal ureterectomy for high-risk distal ureteral urothelial carcinoma: a retrospective multicenter comparative analysis (ROBUUST 2.0 collaborative group).机器人辅助远端输尿管切除术治疗高危远端输尿管尿路上皮癌:一项回顾性多中心对比分析(ROBUUST 2.0 协作组)。
Minerva Urol Nephrol. 2024 Jun;76(3):331-339. doi: 10.23736/S2724-6051.24.05737-9.
3
Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic nephroureterectomy; a systematic review and meta-analysis.机器人辅助与腹腔镜肾输尿管切除术;系统评价与荟萃分析。
BJUI Compass. 2023 Jan 22;4(3):246-255. doi: 10.1002/bco2.208. eCollection 2023 May.
4
European Association of Urology Guidelines on Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: 2023 Update.欧洲泌尿外科学会上尿路尿路上皮癌指南:2023 年更新版。
Eur Urol. 2023 Jul;84(1):49-64. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.03.013. Epub 2023 Mar 24.
5
Simultaneous robot-assisted nephroureterectomy and radical cystectomy.同步机器人辅助肾输尿管切除术和根治性膀胱切除术。
IJU Case Rep. 2022 Sep 18;6(1):14-17. doi: 10.1002/iju5.12534. eCollection 2023 Jan.
6
Is Robotic Superior to Laparoscopic Approach for Radical Nephroureterectomy with Bladder Cuff Excision in Treating Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma?在治疗上尿路尿路上皮癌时,机器人辅助根治性肾输尿管切除术加膀胱袖状切除术是否优于腹腔镜手术?
J Endourol. 2023 Feb;37(2):139-146. doi: 10.1089/end.2022.0154. Epub 2022 Nov 18.
7
Robot-assisted vs. laparoscopic nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on comparative studies.机器人辅助与腹腔镜肾输尿管切除术治疗上尿路尿路上皮癌:基于比较研究的系统评价和荟萃分析
Front Oncol. 2022 Aug 3;12:964256. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.964256. eCollection 2022.
8
Robot-assisted nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma-feasibility and complications: a single center experience.机器人辅助肾盂输尿管癌根治术:单中心经验探讨。
Scand J Urol. 2022 Aug;56(4):301-307. doi: 10.1080/21681805.2022.2091018. Epub 2022 Jun 23.
9
Reporting and grading of complications for intracorporeal robot-assisted radical cystectomy: an in-depth short-term morbidity assessment using the novel Comprehensive Complication Index.机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术并发症的报告和分级:应用新型综合并发症指数进行深入的短期发病率评估。
World J Urol. 2022 Jul;40(7):1679-1688. doi: 10.1007/s00345-022-04051-x. Epub 2022 Jun 7.
10
Outcomes of Lymph Node Dissection in Nephroureterectomy in the Treatment of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: Analysis of the ROBUUST Registry.肾输尿管切除术治疗上尿路尿路上皮癌中淋巴结清扫的结果:ROBUUST 登记处分析。
J Urol. 2022 Aug;208(2):268-276. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000002690. Epub 2022 Apr 4.

机器人手术治疗上尿路尿路上皮癌:单外科医生的初步经验,66 例连续病例。

Robotic surgery of the urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract single surgeon initial experience, 66 consecutive cases.

机构信息

Department of Urology and Robotic Urology, Diakonie Klinikum Siegen, Siegen, Germany.

Department of Urology, Pediatric Urology and Andrology, Justus-Liebig University of Giessen, Giessen, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Urol. 2024 Nov 1;24(1):238. doi: 10.1186/s12894-024-01629-y.

DOI:10.1186/s12894-024-01629-y
PMID:39482641
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11529183/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Robotic surgery is increasingly utilized in the treatment of urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract (UTUC). This study investigates the advantages and burden of robot-assisted surgical treatment of the urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract in a referral urological department, along with their functional and oncological results.

METHODS

The study included 66 prospectively enrolled patients who were surgically treated by a single, robotically specialized surgeon between July 2019 and December 2023. Patients were divided into three groups. Group 1: 50 patients underwent robot-assisted radical Nephroureterectomy (RANU) with bladder cuff excision, Group 2: 11 patients underwent RANU simultaneously with robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC), and Group 3: 5 patients underwent robot-assisted segmental ureterectomy (RASU). Clinical and oncological parameters were compared. Perioperative morbidity according to Clavien-Dindo was the primary endpoint of our study. The secondary endpoint was oncologic outcomes.

RESULTS

37.8% of patients had locally advanced carcinomas. The average console time of RANU with bladder cuff excision was 69 min. The rate of positive surgical margins was n = 1/66 (2%). Lymphadenectomy (LAD) was performed on 30% of patients, with a mean of 13.7 lymph nodes removed. Of those who received LAD, 33% had lymph node metastasis. n = 6/66 (9%) patients received blood transfusion. The overall complication rate was 24%. The readmission rate was 7.5%. With a median follow-up of 26 months, the 2-year recurrence-free survival rate was 84.4%, and the 2-year overall survival rate was 94%.

CONCLUSION

Robotic surgery is a feasible option for treating UTUC that can be adapted to meet the surgical needs of each patient. Prospective studies are warranted to confirm its benefits.

摘要

目的

机器人手术在治疗上尿路尿路上皮癌(UTUC)方面的应用越来越多。本研究调查了在一家转诊泌尿科,机器人辅助手术治疗上尿路尿路上皮癌的优势和负担,以及其功能和肿瘤学结果。

方法

本研究纳入了 66 名前瞻性入组的患者,这些患者均由一位机器人手术专家在 2019 年 7 月至 2023 年 12 月期间进行手术治疗。患者分为三组:组 1:50 例行机器人辅助根治性肾输尿管切除术(RANU)+膀胱袖状切除术,组 2:11 例行 RANU 同期行机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术(RARC),组 3:5 例行机器人辅助节段性输尿管切除术(RASU)。比较临床和肿瘤学参数。根据 Clavien-Dindo 分级的围手术期发病率是本研究的主要终点。次要终点是肿瘤学结果。

结果

37.8%的患者患有局部晚期癌。RANU+膀胱袖状切除术的平均控制台时间为 69 分钟。阳性切缘率为 1/66(2%)。30%的患者行淋巴结清扫术(LAD),平均切除 13.7 个淋巴结。在接受 LAD 的患者中,33%有淋巴结转移。66 例患者中有 6 例(9%)接受输血。总体并发症发生率为 24%。再入院率为 7.5%。中位随访 26 个月,2 年无复发生存率为 84.4%,2 年总生存率为 94%。

结论

机器人手术是治疗 UTUC 的一种可行选择,可以根据每个患者的手术需求进行调整。需要前瞻性研究来证实其益处。