Institute for Applied Behavioral Science, Endicott College, Beverly, MA, USA.
Department of Educational and School Psychology, University of Southern Maine, Gorham, ME, USA.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2024;57(4):989-998. doi: 10.1002/jaba.2905. Epub 2024 Aug 7.
The current study compared the effects of interteaching and discussion forum activities on quiz and assignment scores in a master's-level asynchronous research methods course. In an alternating-treatments design, six participants engaged in interteaching on half of the weeks and in the discussion forum on alternate weeks. Participants in the interteaching condition (M = 96.75) generally scored higher on quizzes than did those in the discussion forum condition (M = 75.95). The results of a paired-sample t test indicated statistically significant differences between the two conditions at p < .0001, with a substantial effect size of 0.6760. Significant differences in assignment scores were not observed between the interteaching (M = 87.28) and discussion forum (M = 89.08) conditions. Limitations and directions for future research are discussed.
本研究比较了讲授法和讨论论坛活动对硕士水平异步研究方法课程测验和作业分数的影响。在交替处理设计中,六名参与者在一半的周中进行讲授法,在另一半周中进行讨论论坛。讲授法条件下的参与者(M=96.75)的测验成绩普遍高于讨论论坛条件下的参与者(M=75.95)。配对样本 t 检验的结果表明,两种条件之间存在统计学上的显著差异(p<.0001),效应量为 0.6760。讲授法和讨论论坛两种条件下的作业成绩没有显著差异(讲授法 M=87.28,讨论论坛 M=89.08)。讨论了研究的局限性和未来研究的方向。