Davis Rebekah A, Sine Kathryn, Burguera-Couce Ella, Ahmad Jabeen, Oliver Brant J
The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH, USA.
The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Perm J. 2024 Sep 16;28(3):245-261. doi: 10.7812/TPP/24.012. Epub 2024 Aug 8.
The purpose of this scoping review was to investigate in the literature how a learning health system (LHS) can be implemented in cases of complex, costly, chronic (3C) conditions.
A scoping review of literature published in English since 2007 was conducted using Medline, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Scopus. Two authors screened the resulting articles and two authors extracted study details on the structure, process, and outcome of each LHS. Eligibility criteria included studies of LHSs that focused on populations experiencing a complex chronic health condition. A narrative synthesis of data was conducted using deductive qualitative methods.
Application of the authors' search strategy resulted in 656 publications that were analyzed for this review. The authors included 17 studies that focused on 13 LHSs. The structure of the LHSs had many components, and many included data from either patient surveys or patient charts. The processes varied widely, from engaging patients in the process to exclusively analyzing the data. The outcomes were largely patient-reported, though several clinical outcomes were also used to benchmark the success of the LHS.
Our review shows that LHS definitions, structures, processes, and outcomes in 3C applications vary widely. Many have shown substantial potential to be implemented and improve care in 3C populations. To deliver on this goal, future work will need to focus on better specification, formalization, and definition of LHS approaches, as well as better design of their structures, processes, and outcomes to fit the needs of the intended population.
本范围综述的目的是在文献中研究如何在复杂、昂贵的慢性(3C)疾病病例中实施学习型健康系统(LHS)。
使用Medline、护理及相关健康文献累积索引和Scopus对自2007年以来以英文发表的文献进行范围综述。两位作者筛选所得文章,两位作者提取每项LHS的结构、过程和结果的研究细节。纳入标准包括聚焦于患有复杂慢性健康状况人群的LHS研究。使用演绎定性方法对数据进行叙述性综合分析。
作者的检索策略共产生656篇供本综述分析的出版物。作者纳入了17项聚焦于13个LHS的研究。LHS的结构有许多组成部分,许多还纳入了患者调查或患者病历中的数据。过程差异很大,从让患者参与到仅对数据进行分析。结果大多是患者报告的,不过也有几项临床结果被用于衡量LHS的成功。
我们的综述表明,3C应用中的LHS定义、结构、过程和结果差异很大。许多已显示出在3C人群中实施和改善护理的巨大潜力。为实现这一目标,未来的工作需要专注于更好地规范、形式化和定义LHS方法,以及更好地设计其结构、过程和结果,以满足目标人群的需求。