Suppr超能文献

骨髓瘤间歇性5药方案(VBCMP)对比间歇性3药方案(VMP)对比间歇性美法仑和泼尼松(MP)的III期研究。

Phase III study of intermittent 5-drug regimen (VBCMP) versus intermittent 3-drug regimen (VMP) versus intermittent melphalan and prednisone (MP) in myelomatosis.

作者信息

Hansen O P, Clausen N A, Drivsholm A, Laursen B

出版信息

Scand J Haematol. 1985 Nov;35(5):518-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0609.1985.tb02822.x.

Abstract

A prospective randomized trial in 96 patients with previously untreated myelomatosis was performed comparing 3 regimens of chemotherapy: (i) Intermittent vincristine, BCNU, cyclophosphamide, melphalan, and prednisone (VBCMP) to (ii) intermittent vincristine, melphalan and prednisone (VMP) to (iii) intermittent melphalan and prednisone (MP). Induction response rates and survival were similar in all 3 regimens. An improvement in relapse-free survival was observed by adding vincristine to MP, but this did not achieve statistical difference (p = 0.10). Patients given VBCMP fared slightly worse than those given VMP. The haematologic toxicity was similar in all 3 regimens, but the tolerability of VBCMP was lower. Although showing no statistical differences between the 3 treatment regimens, the results support the view that a combination of MP 'standard' induction therapy in MM with frequently administered vincristine has a trend towards postponing treatment failure due to development of resistance to melphalan.

摘要

对96例既往未经治疗的骨髓瘤患者进行了一项前瞻性随机试验,比较了3种化疗方案:(i)间歇使用长春新碱、卡莫司汀、环磷酰胺、美法仑和泼尼松(VBCMP)与(ii)间歇使用长春新碱、美法仑和泼尼松(VMP)与(iii)间歇使用美法仑和泼尼松(MP)。所有3种方案的诱导缓解率和生存率相似。在MP方案中加入长春新碱可观察到无复发生存期有所改善,但未达到统计学差异(p = 0.10)。接受VBCMP治疗的患者预后略逊于接受VMP治疗的患者。所有3种方案的血液学毒性相似,但VBCMP的耐受性较低。虽然3种治疗方案之间未显示出统计学差异,但结果支持以下观点,即多发性骨髓瘤中“标准”的MP诱导疗法与频繁使用的长春新碱联合使用,有推迟因对美法仑产生耐药性而导致治疗失败的趋势。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验