Suppr超能文献

K-MMSE~2:SV与K-MMSE之间的项目特征及测试信息比较

A Comparison of Item Characteristics and Test Information Between the K-MMSE~2:SV and K-MMSE.

作者信息

Kim Jihyang, Jahng Seungmin, Kim SangYun, Kang Yeonwook

机构信息

Department of Psychology, College of Social Sciences, Hallym University, Chuncheon, Korea.

Department of Psychology, College of Social Sciences, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Dement Neurocogn Disord. 2024 Jul;23(3):117-126. doi: 10.12779/dnd.2024.23.3.117. Epub 2024 Jul 25.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The Korean-Mini Mental State Examination, 2nd edition (K-MMSE2) was recently released. This study aimed to determine whether the K-MMSE2: Standard Version (K-MMSE~2:SV) had the same test characteristics as the K-MMSE.

METHODS

A total of 1,514 healthy community-based participants aged 19 to 90 years were administered the K-MMSE2:SV Blue Form along with the language items from the K-MMSE. The item and test characteristics and test information for the K-MMSE2:SV and K-MMSE were compared using Item Response Theory analysis.

RESULTS

Item discriminations for the K-MMSE2:SV and K-MMSE were above the moderate range for all items except Recall. Most of the items on the K-MMSE2:SV and K-MMSE had item category difficulty in the very easy or easy range. The test information curve (TIC) showed that the K-MMSE2:SV and K-MMSE provide almost the same amount of information (27.86 vs. 28.44), with both tests providing the most information at an ability level of -1.57. The generalizability (G) coefficient for the K-MMSE2:SV and K-MMSE was 0.99.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that the K-MMSE2:SV and K-MMSE are equally optimal tests for screening for mild cognitive impairment and early dementia. Given that the amount of test information provided by the two tests was almost identical, the shapes of the TICs were very similar, and the G coefficient was close to 1, we can conclude that the K-MMSE and K-MMSE2:SV are equivalent tests.

摘要

背景与目的

《韩国简易精神状态检查表》第2版(K-MMSE2)近期发布。本研究旨在确定K-MMSE2标准版(K-MMSE~2:SV)是否具有与K-MMSE相同的测试特性。

方法

对1514名年龄在19至90岁的社区健康参与者进行K-MMSE2:SV蓝色表格测试以及K-MMSE的语言项目测试。使用项目反应理论分析比较K-MMSE2:SV和K-MMSE的项目及测试特性与测试信息。

结果

除回忆项目外,K-MMSE2:SV和K-MMSE所有项目的项目区分度均高于中等范围。K-MMSE2:SV和K-MMSE的大多数项目的项目类别难度处于非常容易或容易范围内。测试信息曲线(TIC)显示,K-MMSE2:SV和K-MMSE提供的信息量几乎相同(27.86对28.44),两种测试在能力水平为-1.57时提供的信息最多。K-MMSE2:SV和K-MMSE的概化系数(G系数)为0.99。

结论

这些结果表明,K-MMSE2:SV和K-MMSE在筛查轻度认知障碍和早期痴呆方面同样是最佳测试。鉴于两种测试提供的测试信息量几乎相同,TIC的形状非常相似,且G系数接近1,我们可以得出结论,K-MMSE和K-MMSE2:SV是等效测试。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6806/11300688/6cb83f862bd3/dnd-23-117-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验