Yoganathan S A, Riyas Mohamed, Sukumaran Renilmon, Hammoud Rabih, Al-Hammadi Noora
Radiation Oncology, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, QAT.
Cureus. 2024 Jul 8;16(7):e64101. doi: 10.7759/cureus.64101. eCollection 2024 Jul.
Ultra-hypofractionated radiotherapy (UHF RT) is revolutionizing the treatment approach for low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients. This study reports the planning process of UHF RT utilizing the cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)-based online adaptive radiotherapy (OART) treatment with the Ethos system, focusing on a comparative analysis between OART and image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) plans. We also assessed the pre-planning capabilities of the Ethos system against the CyberKnife (CK) (Accuray, Sunnyvale, CA) system. A 66-year-old patient, diagnosed with prostatic acinar adenocarcinoma confirmed via biopsy and presenting with elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, underwent UHF OART treatment using the Ethos system. The planning encompassed delineating the gross target volume (GTV) as the prostate, while the clinical target volume (CTV) comprised the prostate and proximal seminal vesicle. The planning target volume (PTV) was derived from the CTV with a 5 mm external margin except for a 3 mm posterior margin. A simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) technique was employed, delivering 40 Gy in five fractions (8 Gy per fraction) to the gross tumor volume (GTV) and 36.25 Gy in five fractions (7.25 Gy per fraction) to the remaining part of the planning target volume (PTV), with treatments scheduled biweekly. We compared OART and IGRT plans and conducted a comparative analysis between Ethos planning and the CK system for pre-planning assessment. When comparing Ethos planning and CK plans, Ethos demonstrated slightly better target coverage and organ-at-risk (OAR) sparing. However, CK plans showed superior containment of low-dose spillage, particularly at 50% and 25% iso-doses, due to non-coplanar beam arrangements. Our results demonstrated that OART plans yielded superior target coverage and improved OAR sparing compared to IGRT plans. Notably, the entire OART process, from planning to delivery, was accomplished within 27 minutes. The Ethos OART system's ability to adapt to daily anatomical changes, efficient workflow, and superior OAR-sparing capabilities make it a promising option for prostate cancer treatment using UHF RT.
超分割放疗(UHF RT)正在彻底改变低危和中危前列腺癌患者的治疗方法。本研究报告了利用基于锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)的在线自适应放疗(OART)治疗的Ethos系统进行UHF RT的计划制定过程,重点是OART与图像引导放疗(IGRT)计划之间的对比分析。我们还评估了Ethos系统相对于射波刀(CK)(Accuray,加利福尼亚州桑尼维尔)系统的计划制定前能力。一名66岁患者,经活检确诊为前列腺腺泡腺癌,且前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)水平升高,接受了使用Ethos系统的UHF OART治疗。计划制定包括将大体肿瘤体积(GTV)划定为前列腺,而临床靶体积(CTV)包括前列腺和近端精囊。计划靶体积(PTV)由CTV外扩5 mm得出,但后缘为3 mm。采用同步整合加量(SIB)技术,分5次给予大体肿瘤体积(GTV)40 Gy(每次8 Gy),分5次给予计划靶体积(PTV)其余部分36.25 Gy(每次7.25 Gy),治疗安排为每两周一次。我们比较了OART和IGRT计划,并对Ethos计划制定和CK系统进行了对比分析以进行计划制定前评估。比较Ethos计划和CK计划时,Ethos在靶区覆盖和危及器官(OAR)保护方面表现稍好。然而,由于非共面射束排列,CK计划在低剂量溢出控制方面表现更优,尤其是在50%和25%等剂量线处。我们的结果表明,与IGRT计划相比,OART计划具有更好的靶区覆盖和改善的OAR保护。值得注意的是,整个OART过程,从计划制定到实施,在27分钟内完成。Ethos OART系统适应每日解剖结构变化的能力、高效的工作流程以及卓越的OAR保护能力使其成为使用UHF RT治疗前列腺癌的一个有前景的选择。