• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在决定接种第一剂新冠疫苗时,大多数加拿大人的行为可能像目光短浅的理性主义者,而非基于成功经验的学习者。

The majority of Canadians likely behaved as myopic rationalists rather than success-based learners when deciding on their first dose of COVID-19 vaccine.

作者信息

Aghaeeyan Azadeh, Ramazi Pouria, Lewis Mark A

机构信息

Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Brock University, St. Catharines, ON, Canada.

Department of Mathematics and Statistics and Department of Biology, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2024 Jul 24;12:1406911. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1406911. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2024.1406911
PMID:39114515
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11303299/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Successful vaccine promotion communication strategies require knowing how eligible recipients will respond to the opportunity to get vaccinated. Two main classes of recipients are myopic rationalists, those who receive a dose of vaccine only if it maximizes their own instant benefit and if so, do it as soon as possible, and success-based learners, those who learn from others that they perceive to be most successful.

METHODS

A recent study models these two decision-making types, and estimates the population proportion of myopic rationalists in each U.S. state. In this report, we fit a similar model to data on COVID-19 vaccine uptake across the Canadian provinces and territories.

RESULTS

We estimated that 64% of Canadians behaved as myopic rationalists in taking the first dose of a COVID-19 vaccine, compared to an estimated 47% in the United States. Among the provinces, the lowest proportion of myopic rationalists was 0.51 in Saskatchewan, while the highest was 0.74 in Prince Edward Island. The correlation analysis suggested a positive correlation between the proportion of myopic rationalists and the average age across the Canadian provinces (Pearson- = 0.71).

DISCUSSION

Canadian health management may benefit from these results in tailoring the vaccine promotion communication strategies.

摘要

引言

成功的疫苗推广沟通策略需要了解符合条件的接种者对接种疫苗机会的反应方式。主要有两类接种者,一类是目光短浅的理性主义者,即只有在接种疫苗能使自身即时利益最大化时才会接种一剂疫苗,并且一旦如此就会尽快接种;另一类是基于成功经验的学习者,即从他们认为最成功的人那里学习经验的人。

方法

最近的一项研究对这两种决策类型进行了建模,并估计了美国每个州目光短浅的理性主义者的人口比例。在本报告中,我们对加拿大各省和地区的新冠疫苗接种数据拟合了一个类似的模型。

结果

我们估计,64%的加拿大人在接种第一剂新冠疫苗时表现为目光短浅的理性主义者,而在美国这一比例估计为47%。在各省中,目光短浅的理性主义者比例最低的是萨斯喀彻温省,为0.51,最高的是爱德华王子岛省,为0.74。相关性分析表明,加拿大各省目光短浅的理性主义者比例与平均年龄之间存在正相关(皮尔逊相关系数 = 0.71)。

讨论

这些结果可能有助于加拿大的卫生管理部门制定更有针对性的疫苗推广沟通策略。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad35/11303299/2afcd2990c1a/fpubh-12-1406911-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad35/11303299/4eb39ecbd9da/fpubh-12-1406911-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad35/11303299/7d43cf37a3d6/fpubh-12-1406911-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad35/11303299/2afcd2990c1a/fpubh-12-1406911-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad35/11303299/4eb39ecbd9da/fpubh-12-1406911-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad35/11303299/7d43cf37a3d6/fpubh-12-1406911-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad35/11303299/2afcd2990c1a/fpubh-12-1406911-g0003.jpg

相似文献

1
The majority of Canadians likely behaved as myopic rationalists rather than success-based learners when deciding on their first dose of COVID-19 vaccine.在决定接种第一剂新冠疫苗时,大多数加拿大人的行为可能像目光短浅的理性主义者,而非基于成功经验的学习者。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jul 24;12:1406911. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1406911. eCollection 2024.
2
Revealing Decision-Making Strategies of Americans in Taking COVID-19 Vaccination.揭示美国人接种 COVID-19 疫苗的决策策略。
Bull Math Biol. 2024 May 10;86(6):72. doi: 10.1007/s11538-024-01290-4.
3
Safety of COVID-19 vaccines in pregnancy: a Canadian National Vaccine Safety (CANVAS) network cohort study.妊娠期 COVID-19 疫苗的安全性:加拿大国家疫苗安全(CANVAS)网络队列研究。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2022 Nov;22(11):1553-1564. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00426-1. Epub 2022 Aug 11.
4
"Why would we?" A qualitative study on COVID-19 vaccination decision making among Ukrainian economic female migrants in Poland.为什么要这样做?波兰的乌克兰经济女性移民对 COVID-19 疫苗接种决策的定性研究。
Front Public Health. 2024 Aug 13;12:1380627. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1380627. eCollection 2024.
5
Sociodemographic Disparities in COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake and Vaccination Intent in Canada.加拿大新冠疫苗接种率及接种意愿中的社会人口统计学差异
Health Rep. 2022 Dec 21;33(12):37-54. doi: 10.25318/82-003-x202201200004-eng.
6
Dynamic IgG seropositivity after rollout of CoronaVac and BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccines in Chile: a sentinel surveillance study.智利科兴和国药疫苗接种后动态 IgG 血清阳性率:哨点监测研究。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2022 Jan;22(1):56-63. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00479-5. Epub 2021 Sep 9.
7
COVID-19 Vaccine Preferences in General Populations in Canada, Germany, the United Kingdom, and the United States: Discrete Choice Experiment.加拿大、德国、英国和美国普通人群对 COVID-19 疫苗的偏好:离散选择实验。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024 Oct 16;10:e57242. doi: 10.2196/57242.
8
COVID-19 Vaccination and Public Health Countermeasures on Variants of Concern in Canada: Evidence From a Spatial Hierarchical Cluster Analysis.加拿大关注变种的 COVID-19 疫苗接种和公共卫生对策:来自空间分层聚类分析的证据。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2022 May 31;8(5):e31968. doi: 10.2196/31968.
9
Rates and Factors Related to COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake in Racialized and Indigenous Individuals in Canada: The Deleterious Effect of Experience of Racial Discrimination.加拿大种族化和原住民个体中与新冠疫苗接种率及相关因素:种族歧视经历的有害影响
J Med Virol. 2024 Dec;96(12):e70127. doi: 10.1002/jmv.70127.
10
Individual preferences for COVID-19 vaccination in China.中国人对 COVID-19 疫苗接种的个体偏好。
Vaccine. 2021 Jan 8;39(2):247-254. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.12.009. Epub 2020 Dec 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Revealing Decision-Making Strategies of Americans in Taking COVID-19 Vaccination.揭示美国人接种 COVID-19 疫苗的决策策略。
Bull Math Biol. 2024 May 10;86(6):72. doi: 10.1007/s11538-024-01290-4.
2
Socio-Demographic Factors Associated With COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy Among Middle-Aged Adults During the Quebec's Vaccination Campaign.与魁北克省疫苗接种运动期间中年人群 COVID-19 疫苗犹豫相关的社会人口学因素。
Front Public Health. 2022 Mar 18;10:756037. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.756037. eCollection 2022.
3
Disparities in COVID-19 Vaccination Coverage Between Urban and Rural Counties - United States, December 14, 2020-January 31, 2022.
城乡地区 COVID-19 疫苗接种率的差异-美国,2020 年 12 月 14 日-2022 年 1 月 31 日。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2022 Mar 4;71(9):335-340. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7109a2.
4
COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy and Acceptance Among Individuals With Cancer, Autoimmune Diseases, or Other Serious Comorbid Conditions: Cross-sectional, Internet-Based Survey.COVID-19 疫苗犹豫和接受情况在癌症、自身免疫性疾病或其他严重合并症患者中的调查:基于互联网的横断面研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2022 Jan 5;8(1):e29872. doi: 10.2196/29872.
5
A sub-national real-time epidemiological and vaccination database for the COVID-19 pandemic in Canada.加拿大 COVID-19 大流行的国家以下实时流行病学和疫苗接种数据库。
Sci Data. 2021 Jul 15;8(1):173. doi: 10.1038/s41597-021-00955-2.
6
Factors Associated with Willingness to be Vaccinated Against COVID-19 in a Large Convenience Sample.与大便利样本中 COVID-19 疫苗接种意愿相关的因素。
J Community Health. 2021 Oct;46(5):1013-1019. doi: 10.1007/s10900-021-00987-0. Epub 2021 Apr 9.
7
Factors Associated With US Adults' Likelihood of Accepting COVID-19 Vaccination.与美国成年人接受 COVID-19 疫苗意愿相关的因素。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Oct 1;3(10):e2025594. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.25594.
8
Focus on the success of others leads to selfish behavior.关注他人的成功会导致自私行为。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Mar 3;112(9):2912-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1417203112. Epub 2015 Feb 17.
9
Long-standing influenza vaccination policy is in accord with individual self-interest but not with the utilitarian optimum.长期以来的流感疫苗接种政策符合个人自身利益,但不符合功利主义的最优原则。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Mar 27;104(13):5692-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0606774104. Epub 2007 Mar 16.
10
Imitation dynamics predict vaccinating behaviour.模仿动态预测疫苗接种行为。
Proc Biol Sci. 2005 Aug 22;272(1573):1669-75. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2005.3153.