Clinical value of low-dose three-dimensional reconstruction by multi-slice spiral computed tomography and by traditional X-ray in the diagnosis of distal radius epiphyseal injury in children.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the clinical value of multi-slice spiral computed tomography (MSCT) low-dose three-dimensional reconstruction and traditional X-ray in the auxiliary diagnosis of distal radius epiphyseal injury in children.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on 105 children with distal radius bone scale injury (classified by Salter-Harris classification) admitted from March 2020 to June 2022. All children underwent MSCT three-dimensional reconstruction examination and traditional X-ray examination. The detection rate of epiphyseal injury of the distal radius was compared, along with the resolution, sensitivity and specificity. The image clarity and display degree of bone structure were analyzed. The radiation dose-related indicators and the time required for diagnosis were compared.

RESULTS

The detection rate and diagnostic accuracy of MSCT (100%, 92.38%) was significantly higher than that of X-ray (76.19%, 64.76%). In terms of radiation dose index, the volume dose index CTDI of MSCT ranged from 1-5 mGy while the X-ray group ranged from 5-10 mGy. The dose length product (DLP) value of the MSCT group was lower than in the X-ray group (20-100 mGy·cm vs. 50-150 mGy·cm). The diagnostic scan time for MSCT was shorter than that of conventional X-ray. The acceptance rate with MSCT was 99%, significantly higher than that with conventional X-ray (85%).

CONCLUSIONS

Low-dose three-dimensional reconstruction of MSCT in the diagnosis of epiphyseal injury of distal radius in children shows significant advantages over traditional CT in the detection rate, diagnostic accuracy, postoperative reduction quality evaluation, and radiation dose.