Duan Alin, Xiang Zhou, Fan Yongxi, Duan Weinan, Wei Qingyu, Duan Xin
Department of Orthopedics, West China Hospital of Sichuan University Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, China.
Department of Restoration and Reconstruction, No. 1 Orthopedics Hospital of Chengdu Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, China.
Am J Transl Res. 2024 Jul 15;16(7):3326-3337. doi: 10.62347/HFVE6316. eCollection 2024.
To comprehensively assess the clinical efficacy of the anterolateral thigh flap in lower limb reconstruction (LLR) surgeries and explore its application value via a meta-analysis.
Published articles on the efficacy of anterolateral thigh flap in LLR were retrieved in English databases such as PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and The Cochrane Library, which were searched from their inception to November 2023. The search terms included "anterolateral thigh flaps", "lower extremity", "free muscle" and "reconstruction". Subsequently, data extraction of eligible studies was carried out, and data analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.3 software.
The final selection comprised 12 appropriate studies, encompassing a total of 577 patients. Meta-analysis demonstrated that negligible differences existed in the length of hospital stay among patients treated with different types of flaps (mean difference (MD) =-0.10, 95% confidence interval (CI) =-0.400.20, P>0.05). Additionally, the occurrence of complications differed slightly (Risk difference (RD) =-0.02, 95% CI=-0.090.05, P>0.05). The incidence of secondary surgeries also demonstrated non-significant differences (RD=-0.04, 95% CI=-0.11-0.04, P>0.05). Nevertheless, patients who underwent anterolateral thigh flap transplantation exhibited a drastic decrease in donor site morbidity (Odds ratio (OR) =0.22, 95% CI=0.10-0.49, P<0.05).
The clinical efficacy of the anterolateral thigh flap in LLR surgeries shows no significant differences in hospital stay, complication rates, or the need for secondary surgeries compared to other flaps. However, using anterolateral thigh flap in LLR significantly reduces donor site morbidity.
通过荟萃分析全面评估股前外侧皮瓣在下肢重建(LLR)手术中的临床疗效,并探讨其应用价值。
在PubMed、Web of Science、Embase和Cochrane图书馆等英文数据库中检索自建库至2023年11月发表的关于股前外侧皮瓣在LLR中疗效的文章。检索词包括“股前外侧皮瓣”“下肢”“游离肌肉”和“重建”。随后,对符合条件的研究进行数据提取,并使用RevMan 5.3软件进行数据分析。
最终纳入12项合适的研究,共577例患者。荟萃分析表明,不同类型皮瓣治疗的患者住院时间差异可忽略不计(平均差(MD)=-0.10,95%置信区间(CI)=-0.40至0.20,P>0.05)。此外,并发症的发生率略有差异(风险差(RD)=-0.02,95% CI=-0.09至0.05,P>0.05)。二次手术的发生率也无显著差异(RD=-0.04,95% CI=-0.11至0.04,P>0.05)。然而,接受股前外侧皮瓣移植的患者供区并发症发生率显著降低(优势比(OR)=0.22,95% CI=0.10至0.49,P<0.05)。
与其他皮瓣相比,股前外侧皮瓣在LLR手术中的临床疗效在住院时间、并发症发生率或二次手术需求方面无显著差异。然而,在LLR中使用股前外侧皮瓣可显著降低供区并发症发生率。