Clinical and Diagnostic Immunology, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Department of Laboratory Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
J Appl Lab Med. 2024 Nov 4;9(6):977-989. doi: 10.1093/jalm/jfae080.
The presence of anti-interferon (IFN)-α2 autoantibodies is a strong indicator of severe disease course during viral infections and is observed in autoimmune diseases (e.g., myasthenia gravis). Detection of these autoantibodies during severe bacterial infections is understudied. Multiple anti-IFN-α2 autoantibody screening assays are available. However, the results do not always correlate with the neutralizing capacity of the autoantibodies.
Anti-IFN-α2 antibodies were measured by a Luminex-based assay in serum samples from individuals admitted to the intensive care unit infected with influenza (n = 38), invasive bacteria (n = 152), and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) (n = 52). Anti-IFN-α2 antibodies were also studied in individuals with myasthenia gravis (n = 22) and in healthy individuals (n = 37). Individuals testing positive by Luminex were subsequently tested by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and tested for nonspecific reactivity and neutralization.
Three of 16 Luminex-positive samples had nonspecific reactivity, 11/16 were positive by ELISA, and 10/16 had neutralizing activity. Anti-IFN-α2 antibodies were found in individuals infected with SARS-CoV-2 (7/52), influenza (3/38), invasive bacteria [2/152, of which 1 was Legionella pneumophilia and was 1 Escherichia coli (E. coli) (out of 39 E. coli infections)], and in individuals with myasthenia gravis (2/22).
Anti-IFN-α2 autoantibodies were detected in viral infections, myasthenia gravis, and rarely in bacterial infections. ELISA and Luminex screening assays do not give similar results. Nonspecific reactivity and functional assays are necessary to validate the screening test result.
抗干扰素(IFN)-α2 自身抗体的存在是病毒感染期间严重疾病过程的强烈指标,并且在自身免疫性疾病(例如重症肌无力)中观察到。在严重细菌感染期间对这些自身抗体的检测研究较少。有多种抗 IFN-α2 自身抗体筛选检测方法。然而,结果并不总是与自身抗体的中和能力相关。
在因流感(n = 38)、侵袭性细菌(n = 152)和严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2)(n = 52)而入住重症监护病房的个体的血清样本中,通过基于 Luminex 的测定法测量抗 IFN-α2 抗体。还在重症肌无力(n = 22)和健康个体(n = 37)中研究了抗 IFN-α2 抗体。通过 Luminex 检测呈阳性的个体随后通过酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)进行检测,并检测非特异性反应和中和作用。
在 16 个 Luminex 阳性样本中有 3 个具有非特异性反应,11/16 通过 ELISA 检测呈阳性,并且 10/16 具有中和活性。在感染 SARS-CoV-2(n = 52)、流感(n = 38)、侵袭性细菌[2/152,其中 1 个是嗜肺军团菌,另 1 个是大肠杆菌(E. coli)(在 39 种 E. coli 感染中)]和重症肌无力(n = 22)的个体中发现了抗 IFN-α2 抗体。
在病毒感染、重症肌无力和罕见的细菌感染中检测到抗 IFN-α2 自身抗体。ELISA 和 Luminex 筛选检测方法不会给出相似的结果。需要进行非特异性反应和功能检测来验证筛选检测结果。