Suppr超能文献

内镜医师对结肠镜插入阶段的满意度是结直肠息肉检测的潜在质量指标:一项倾向评分匹配研究

Endoscopist's Satisfaction with the Insertion Phase of Colonoscopy Is a Potential Quality Indicator for Colorectal Polyp Detection: A Propensity Score Matching Study.

作者信息

Ishibashi Fumiaki, Suzuki Sho, Mochida Kentaro, Nagai Mizuki, Kobayashi Konomi, Kawakami Tomohiro, Morishita Tetsuo

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, International University of Health and Welfare Ichikawa Hospital, Chiba, Japan.

Koganei Tsurukame Clinic, Endoscopy Center, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Turk J Gastroenterol. 2024 Mar 12;35(6):488-496. doi: 10.5152/tjg.2024.23508.

Abstract

Quality indicators during the insertion phase of colonoscopy require exploration. Unsatisfactory insertion experiences cause endoscopist psychophysiological fatigue and affect the quality of their inspection. This comparative study used propensity score matching (PSM) to determine whether endoscopist satisfaction during scope insertion was related to polyp detection rate (PDR). Patients who underwent colonoscopy screening between April 2019 and December 2022 were enrolled in this study. The endoscopist satisfaction score (high and low) during the insertion phase in each examination was recorded based on the level of fatigue and presence of paradoxical scope movement. All examinations were classified into 2 groups: a high and a low satisfaction score group. After PSM with potential confounding factors related to polyp detection (endoscopist, insertion and withdrawal time, and sedative agent use), the PDR and adenoma detection rate (ADR) were compared. Overall, 4142 patients (average age, 54.1 years old; 54.4% male) underwent colonoscopies performed by twelve experienced endoscopists. Analysis using a logistic regression model revealed that a high satisfaction score during the insertion phase was an independent predictor of polyp detection (P < .001, odds ratio 1.79, 95% CI 1.41-2.33), whereas insertion time was not. After PSM, 513 patients from both groups were eligible for comparison. Polyp detection rate and ADR were significantly higher in the high-satisfaction group than in the low-satisfaction group (49.5% vs. 36.6%, P < .001; 35.1% vs. 27.1%, P = .007). The endoscopists' level of satisfaction with the insertion phase was shown to be a potential predictor of PDR in screening colonoscopy.

摘要

结肠镜检查插入阶段的质量指标有待探索。不满意的插入体验会导致内镜医师出现心理生理疲劳,并影响其检查质量。这项比较研究采用倾向评分匹配(PSM)来确定内镜医师在插入镜身过程中的满意度是否与息肉检出率(PDR)相关。2019年4月至2022年12月期间接受结肠镜筛查的患者纳入本研究。根据疲劳程度和是否存在镜身反常移动情况记录每次检查插入阶段的内镜医师满意度评分(高和低)。所有检查分为两组:高满意度评分组和低满意度评分组。在对与息肉检测相关的潜在混杂因素(内镜医师、插入和退出时间以及镇静剂使用情况)进行倾向评分匹配后,比较息肉检出率和腺瘤检出率(ADR)。总体而言,4142例患者(平均年龄54.1岁;男性占54.4%)接受了12名经验丰富的内镜医师进行的结肠镜检查。使用逻辑回归模型分析显示,插入阶段的高满意度评分是息肉检测的独立预测因素(P < 0.001,优势比1.79,95%可信区间1.41 - 2.33),而插入时间则不是。倾向评分匹配后,两组的513例患者符合比较条件。高满意度组的息肉检出率和腺瘤检出率显著高于低满意度组(49.5%对36.6%,P < 0.001;35.1%对27.1%,P = 0.007)。内镜医师对插入阶段的满意度水平被证明是筛查结肠镜检查中息肉检出率的一个潜在预测因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44ac/11232077/b005019b753a/tjg-35-6-488_f001.jpg

相似文献

3
Polyp Sizing Poster Improves Polyp Measurement but not Adenoma Detection Rates by Endoscopists in a Large Community Practice.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Sep;17(10):2034-2041. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.10.008. Epub 2018 Oct 9.
4
Good is better than excellent: bowel preparation quality and adenoma detection rates.
Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Mar;81(3):691-699.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.10.032.
5
High quality of screening colonoscopy in Austria is not dependent on endoscopist specialty or setting.
Endoscopy. 2015 Mar;47(3):207-16. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1390910. Epub 2014 Nov 20.
7
Difference in Physician- and Patient-Dependent Factors Contributing to Adenoma Detection Rate and Serrated Polyp Detection Rate.
Dig Dis Sci. 2019 Dec;64(12):3579-3588. doi: 10.1007/s10620-019-05808-y. Epub 2019 Aug 30.
8
Nonneoplastic polypectomy during screening colonoscopy: the impact on polyp detection rate, adenoma detection rate, and overall cost.
Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Aug;82(2):370-375.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.01.016. Epub 2015 Apr 3.
9
Data quality and colonoscopy performance indicators in the prevalent round of a FIT-based colorectal cancer screening program.
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2019 Apr;54(4):471-477. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2019.1597158. Epub 2019 Apr 12.
10
High-definition colonoscopy increases adenoma detection rate.
Surg Endosc. 2017 Jan;31(1):78-84. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4986-7. Epub 2016 Jun 10.

本文引用的文献

2
Colonoscopy screening and surveillance guidelines.
Dig Endosc. 2021 May;33(4):486-519. doi: 10.1111/den.13972.
4
Colorectal cancer statistics, 2020.
CA Cancer J Clin. 2020 May;70(3):145-164. doi: 10.3322/caac.21601. Epub 2020 Mar 5.
5
Number of polyps detected is a useful indicator of quality of clinical colonoscopy.
Endosc Int Open. 2018 Jul;6(7):E878-E884. doi: 10.1055/a-0605-3264. Epub 2018 Jul 4.
6
Prolonged Cecal Insertion Time Is Not Associated with Decreased Adenoma Detection When a Longer Withdrawal Time Is Achieved.
Dig Dis Sci. 2018 Nov;63(11):3120-3125. doi: 10.1007/s10620-018-5100-x. Epub 2018 May 3.
7
Adenoma Detection Rate Falls at the End of the Day in a Large Multi-site Sample.
Dig Dis Sci. 2018 Apr;63(4):856-859. doi: 10.1007/s10620-018-4947-1. Epub 2018 Feb 3.
8
Can polyp detection rate be used prospectively as a marker of adenoma detection rate?
Surg Endosc. 2018 Mar;32(3):1141-1148. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5785-5. Epub 2017 Aug 15.
9
Endoscopist fatigue estimates and colonoscopic adenoma detection in a large community-based setting.
Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Mar;85(3):601-610.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.09.033. Epub 2016 Oct 1.
10
Prolonged cecal insertion time is associated with decreased adenoma detection.
Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Mar;85(3):574-580. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.08.021. Epub 2016 Aug 31.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验