Ishibashi Fumiaki, Suzuki Sho, Mochida Kentaro, Nagai Mizuki, Kobayashi Konomi, Kawakami Tomohiro, Morishita Tetsuo
Department of Gastroenterology, International University of Health and Welfare Ichikawa Hospital, Chiba, Japan.
Koganei Tsurukame Clinic, Endoscopy Center, Tokyo, Japan.
Turk J Gastroenterol. 2024 Mar 12;35(6):488-496. doi: 10.5152/tjg.2024.23508.
Quality indicators during the insertion phase of colonoscopy require exploration. Unsatisfactory insertion experiences cause endoscopist psychophysiological fatigue and affect the quality of their inspection. This comparative study used propensity score matching (PSM) to determine whether endoscopist satisfaction during scope insertion was related to polyp detection rate (PDR). Patients who underwent colonoscopy screening between April 2019 and December 2022 were enrolled in this study. The endoscopist satisfaction score (high and low) during the insertion phase in each examination was recorded based on the level of fatigue and presence of paradoxical scope movement. All examinations were classified into 2 groups: a high and a low satisfaction score group. After PSM with potential confounding factors related to polyp detection (endoscopist, insertion and withdrawal time, and sedative agent use), the PDR and adenoma detection rate (ADR) were compared. Overall, 4142 patients (average age, 54.1 years old; 54.4% male) underwent colonoscopies performed by twelve experienced endoscopists. Analysis using a logistic regression model revealed that a high satisfaction score during the insertion phase was an independent predictor of polyp detection (P < .001, odds ratio 1.79, 95% CI 1.41-2.33), whereas insertion time was not. After PSM, 513 patients from both groups were eligible for comparison. Polyp detection rate and ADR were significantly higher in the high-satisfaction group than in the low-satisfaction group (49.5% vs. 36.6%, P < .001; 35.1% vs. 27.1%, P = .007). The endoscopists' level of satisfaction with the insertion phase was shown to be a potential predictor of PDR in screening colonoscopy.
结肠镜检查插入阶段的质量指标有待探索。不满意的插入体验会导致内镜医师出现心理生理疲劳,并影响其检查质量。这项比较研究采用倾向评分匹配(PSM)来确定内镜医师在插入镜身过程中的满意度是否与息肉检出率(PDR)相关。2019年4月至2022年12月期间接受结肠镜筛查的患者纳入本研究。根据疲劳程度和是否存在镜身反常移动情况记录每次检查插入阶段的内镜医师满意度评分(高和低)。所有检查分为两组:高满意度评分组和低满意度评分组。在对与息肉检测相关的潜在混杂因素(内镜医师、插入和退出时间以及镇静剂使用情况)进行倾向评分匹配后,比较息肉检出率和腺瘤检出率(ADR)。总体而言,4142例患者(平均年龄54.1岁;男性占54.4%)接受了12名经验丰富的内镜医师进行的结肠镜检查。使用逻辑回归模型分析显示,插入阶段的高满意度评分是息肉检测的独立预测因素(P < 0.001,优势比1.79,95%可信区间1.41 - 2.33),而插入时间则不是。倾向评分匹配后,两组的513例患者符合比较条件。高满意度组的息肉检出率和腺瘤检出率显著高于低满意度组(49.5%对36.6%,P < 0.001;35.1%对27.1%,P = 0.007)。内镜医师对插入阶段的满意度水平被证明是筛查结肠镜检查中息肉检出率的一个潜在预测因素。