• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

检测到的息肉数量是临床结肠镜检查质量的一个有用指标。

Number of polyps detected is a useful indicator of quality of clinical colonoscopy.

作者信息

Amano Takahiro, Nishida Tsutomu, Shimakoshi Hiromi, Shimoda Akiyoshi, Osugi Naoto, Sugimoto Aya, Takahashi Kei, Mukai Kaori, Nakamatsu Dai, Matsubara Tokuhiro, Yamamoto Masashi, Hayashi Shiro, Nakajima Sachiko, Fukui Koji, Inada Masami

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Toyonaka Municipal Hospital, Osaka, Japan.

出版信息

Endosc Int Open. 2018 Jul;6(7):E878-E884. doi: 10.1055/a-0605-3264. Epub 2018 Jul 4.

DOI:10.1055/a-0605-3264
PMID:29978009
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6032632/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

Adenoma detection rate (ADR) is a well-known quality indicator (QI) for colonoscopy. It is, however, difficult to evaluate ADR during practice. The aim of this study was to investigate the number of endoscopically detected polyps as a QI for colonoscopy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective single-center cohort study of 5,190 consecutive patients who underwent colonoscopy from January 2015 to May 2016. Among these patients, we ultimately enrolled 1,937 patients for initial colonoscopy. We evaluated QIs including bowel preparation, cecum intubation time, withdrawal time, number of endoscopically detected polyps, ADR and advanced neoplasia detection rate (ANDR).

RESULTS

The mean number of endoscopically detected polyps, ADR and ANDR were 1.5 ± 2.3 (95 % confidence interval (CI)1.4 - 1.6), 38.6 % (95 % CI 36.5-40.8), and 18.3 % (95 % CI 16.6 - 20.1), respectively. ADR and ANDR increased with the number of endoscopically detected polyps, but the correlation reached a plateau at five or more polyps. We divided the patients into three groups based on the number of polyps (1 to 2, 3 to 4, and 5 or more). Logistic regression analysis adjusted by age and sex revealed that presence of a large number of polyps was a strong predictor of advanced neoplasia (odds ratio: 3.1 [95 % CI 2.2 - 4.3] for 3 to 4 polyps and 7.9 [95 % CI 5.4 - 11.8] for 5 or more polyps when using the presence of 1 or 2 polyps as a reference).

CONCLUSION

The number of endoscopically detected polyps can predict risk of advanced neoplasia and may thus be a new QI for colonoscopy.

摘要

背景与研究目的

腺瘤检出率(ADR)是结肠镜检查中一项广为人知的质量指标(QI)。然而,在实际操作过程中评估ADR存在困难。本研究旨在调查内镜下检出息肉的数量作为结肠镜检查的一项质量指标。

患者与方法

这是一项回顾性单中心队列研究,研究对象为2015年1月至2016年5月期间连续接受结肠镜检查的5190例患者。在这些患者中,我们最终纳入1937例接受初次结肠镜检查的患者。我们评估了包括肠道准备、盲肠插管时间、退镜时间、内镜下检出息肉数量、ADR以及高级别瘤变检出率(ANDR)在内的质量指标。

结果

内镜下检出息肉的平均数量、ADR和ANDR分别为1.5±2.3(95%置信区间[CI]1.4 - 1.6)、38.6%(95%CI 36.5 - 40.8)和18.3%(95%CI 16.6 - 20.1)。ADR和ANDR随着内镜下检出息肉数量的增加而升高,但在息肉数量达到5个或更多时,这种相关性趋于平稳。我们根据息肉数量将患者分为三组(1至2个、3至4个以及5个或更多)。经年龄和性别校正的逻辑回归分析显示,大量息肉的存在是高级别瘤变的有力预测因素(以1或2个息肉的存在作为参照时,3至4个息肉的优势比为3.1[95%CI 2.2 - 4.3],5个或更多息肉的优势比为7.9[95%CI 5.4 - 11.8])。

结论

内镜下检出息肉的数量能够预测高级别瘤变风险,因此可能成为结肠镜检查的一项新的质量指标。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5cef/6032632/fe1c6ae88738/10-1055-a-0605-3264-i1109ei3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5cef/6032632/99a20d093ceb/10-1055-a-0605-3264-i1109ei1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5cef/6032632/de92f8afede4/10-1055-a-0605-3264-i1109ei2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5cef/6032632/fe1c6ae88738/10-1055-a-0605-3264-i1109ei3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5cef/6032632/99a20d093ceb/10-1055-a-0605-3264-i1109ei1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5cef/6032632/de92f8afede4/10-1055-a-0605-3264-i1109ei2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5cef/6032632/fe1c6ae88738/10-1055-a-0605-3264-i1109ei3.jpg

相似文献

1
Number of polyps detected is a useful indicator of quality of clinical colonoscopy.检测到的息肉数量是临床结肠镜检查质量的一个有用指标。
Endosc Int Open. 2018 Jul;6(7):E878-E884. doi: 10.1055/a-0605-3264. Epub 2018 Jul 4.
2
Adenoma and advanced neoplasia detection rates increase from 45 years of age.腺瘤和高级别瘤变的检出率从 45 岁开始增加。
World J Gastroenterol. 2019 Jan 28;25(4):447-456. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i4.447.
3
Latest Generation High-Definition Colonoscopy Increases Adenoma Detection Rate by Trainee Endoscopists.最新代高清结肠镜检查可提高受训内镜医师的腺瘤检出率。
Dig Dis Sci. 2021 Aug;66(8):2756-2762. doi: 10.1007/s10620-020-06543-5. Epub 2020 Aug 18.
4
Polyp Detection Rate Correlates Strongly with Adenoma Detection Rate in Trainee Endoscopists.在受训内镜医师中,息肉检出率与腺瘤检出率密切相关。
Dig Dis Sci. 2020 Aug;65(8):2229-2233. doi: 10.1007/s10620-020-06049-0. Epub 2020 Jan 11.
5
Differences in detection rates of adenomas and serrated polyps in screening versus surveillance colonoscopies, based on the new hampshire colonoscopy registry.基于新罕布什尔州结肠镜检查登记处的数据,在筛查性结肠镜检查与监测性结肠镜检查中,腺瘤和锯齿状息肉的检出率存在差异。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 Oct;11(10):1308-12. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2013.04.042. Epub 2013 May 6.
6
Adenoma detection rate in high-risk patients differs from that in average-risk patients.高危患者的腺瘤检出率与一般风险患者不同。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Jan;83(1):172-8. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.04.019. Epub 2015 May 27.
7
Improving trainee colonoscopy performance by investigating the withdrawal time from individual colonic segments: a single-center observational study.通过研究从单个结肠段退出的时间来提高学员结肠镜检查的表现:一项单中心观察性研究。
Ann Palliat Med. 2021 Aug;10(8):8607-8616. doi: 10.21037/apm-21-622. Epub 2021 Jul 30.
8
Relationship of colonoscopy-detected serrated polyps with synchronous advanced neoplasia in average-risk individuals.结肠镜检查发现锯齿状息肉与平均风险个体中同时存在的高级别肿瘤的关系。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Aug;78(2):333-341.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.03.003. Epub 2013 Apr 25.
9
Impact of fair bowel preparation quality on adenoma and serrated polyp detection: data from the New Hampshire colonoscopy registry by using a standardized preparation-quality rating.肠道准备质量良好对腺瘤和锯齿状息肉检测的影响:来自新罕布什尔州结肠镜检查登记处的数据,采用标准化的准备质量评级
Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Sep;80(3):463-70. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.03.021. Epub 2014 May 10.
10
Timed screening colonoscopy: a randomized trial of two colonoscopic withdrawal techniques.定时筛查结肠镜检查:两种结肠镜退镜技术的随机试验。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Mar;34(3):1200-1205. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06873-0. Epub 2019 May 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Zero-inflated models for the evaluation of colorectal polyps in colon cancer screening studies-a value-based biostatistics practice.用于结肠癌筛查研究中评估结直肠息肉的零膨胀模型——基于价值的生物统计学实践
PeerJ. 2025 May 26;13:e19504. doi: 10.7717/peerj.19504. eCollection 2025.
2
Case-mix-adjusted mean number of polyps per 100 procedures: a new candidate gold standard colonoscopy key performance indicator.每100例手术的病例组合调整后息肉平均数量:一种新的候选结肠镜检查金标准关键绩效指标。
BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2025 May 2;12(1):e001743. doi: 10.1136/bmjgast-2025-001743.
3
Operation sequence of bidirectional endoscopy with topical anesthesia affected colonoscopy performance: a randomized controlled trial.

本文引用的文献

1
Calculating the adenoma detection rate in screening colonoscopies only: Is it necessary? Can it be gamed?仅计算筛查结肠镜检查中的腺瘤检出率:有必要吗?是否可以操纵?
Endoscopy. 2017 Nov;49(11):1069-1074. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-113445. Epub 2017 Jul 28.
2
Colorectal Cancer Screening: Recommendations for Physicians and Patients from the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.结直肠癌筛查:美国多学会专家组对医生和患者的建议。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2017 Jul;112(7):1016-1030. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2017.174. Epub 2017 Jun 6.
3
Maintaining low non-neoplastic polypectomy rates in high-quality screening colonoscopy.
局部麻醉下双向内镜检查的操作顺序对结肠镜检查性能的影响:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2025 Feb 27;25(1):121. doi: 10.1186/s12876-025-03721-5.
4
Endoscopist's Satisfaction with the Insertion Phase of Colonoscopy Is a Potential Quality Indicator for Colorectal Polyp Detection: A Propensity Score Matching Study.内镜医师对结肠镜插入阶段的满意度是结直肠息肉检测的潜在质量指标:一项倾向评分匹配研究
Turk J Gastroenterol. 2024 Mar 12;35(6):488-496. doi: 10.5152/tjg.2024.23508.
5
3D genomic mapping reveals multifocality of human pancreatic precancers.3D 基因组图谱揭示人类胰腺前癌的多灶性。
Nature. 2024 May;629(8012):679-687. doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07359-3. Epub 2024 May 1.
6
Initiatives to increase colonoscopy capacity - is there an impact on polyp detection? A UK National Endoscopy Database analysis.增加结肠镜检查能力的举措 - 是否对息肉检出率有影响?英国国家内镜数据库分析。
Endoscopy. 2024 Apr;56(4):302-310. doi: 10.1055/a-2214-9840. Epub 2023 Nov 21.
7
Colorectal Cancer Screening with Computed Tomography Colonography: Single Region Experience in Kazakhstan.计算机断层结肠成像用于结直肠癌筛查:哈萨克斯坦单一地区的经验
Clin Endosc. 2022 Jan;55(1):101-112. doi: 10.5946/ce.2021.066. Epub 2021 Jul 15.
8
Comparison of colonoscopy after colonic diverticulitis and positive fecal immunochemical tests for the detection of colorectal neoplasia.结肠憩室炎后结肠镜检查与粪便免疫化学检测阳性对结直肠肿瘤检测的比较。
Endosc Int Open. 2021 Mar;9(3):E331-E337. doi: 10.1055/a-1333-1108. Epub 2021 Feb 18.
9
Colonoscopy and polypectomy: beside age, size of polyps main factor for long-term risk of colorectal cancer in a screening population.结肠镜检查和息肉切除术:除年龄外,息肉大小是筛查人群结直肠癌长期风险的主要因素。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2021 Sep;147(9):2645-2658. doi: 10.1007/s00432-021-03532-7. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
10
High-quality colon cleansing and multiple neoplasia detection with 1L NER1006 versus mid-volume options: Post hoc analysis of phase 3 clinical trials.使用1L NER1006与中等容量方案进行高质量结肠清洁和多种肿瘤检测:3期临床试验的事后分析
Endosc Int Open. 2020 May;8(5):E628-E635. doi: 10.1055/a-1119-6509. Epub 2020 Apr 17.
维持高质量结肠镜筛查中较低的非肿瘤性息肉切除术率。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Mar;85(3):581-587. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.08.029. Epub 2016 Sep 3.
4
A new quality indicator of colonoscopy: caveat emptor.结肠镜检查的一项新质量指标:买者自负。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Sep;84(3):507-11. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.05.004. Epub 2016 May 11.
5
Comparison of adenoma detection rate and adenoma per colonoscopy as a quality indicator of colonoscopy.腺瘤检出率及每次结肠镜检查腺瘤数量作为结肠镜检查质量指标的比较
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2016 Jul;51(7):886-90. doi: 10.3109/00365521.2016.1157892. Epub 2016 Mar 22.
6
Real-Time Characterization of Diminutive Colorectal Polyp Histology Using Narrow-Band Imaging: Implications for the Resect and Discard Strategy.使用窄带成像对微小结直肠息肉组织学进行实时特征分析:对切除与丢弃策略的影响
Gastroenterology. 2016 Feb;150(2):406-18. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.10.042. Epub 2015 Oct 30.
7
Longer Withdrawal Time Is Associated With a Reduced Incidence of Interval Cancer After Screening Colonoscopy.筛查结肠镜检查后,较长的撤镜时间与间隔期癌症发生率降低相关。
Gastroenterology. 2015 Oct;149(4):952-7. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.06.044. Epub 2015 Jul 9.
8
JGES guidelines for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection/endoscopic mucosal resection.日本胃肠病学会结直肠内镜黏膜下剥离术/内镜黏膜切除术指南
Dig Endosc. 2015 May;27(4):417-434. doi: 10.1111/den.12456. Epub 2015 Mar 5.
9
Quality indicators for colonoscopy.结肠镜检查的质量指标。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Jan;81(1):31-53. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.07.058. Epub 2014 Dec 2.
10
Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012.全球癌症发病与死亡:GLOBOCAN 2012 数据源、方法与主要模式。
Int J Cancer. 2015 Mar 1;136(5):E359-86. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29210. Epub 2014 Oct 9.