Suppr超能文献

广泛期小细胞肺癌患者接受化疗免疫治疗时 G-CSF 预防的疗效和安全性。

Efficacy and safety of G-CSF prophylaxis in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer receiving chemoimmunotherapy.

机构信息

Department of Medical Oncology, Antalya City Hospital, Antalya, Turkey.

Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2024 Aug;25(11):1555-1563. doi: 10.1080/14656566.2024.2391007. Epub 2024 Aug 11.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) prophylaxis during chemoimmunotherapy with carboplatin plus etoposide and atezolizumab in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC).

METHODS

This retrospective, multicenter study enrolled ES-SCLC patients receiving carboplatin plus etoposide and atezolizumab, categorized into G-CSF and non-G-CSF groups. Demographic and disease-related data were collected. Response rates, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity were analyzed.

RESULTS

Of 119 patients (median age: 63 years), the overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were 72.3% and 81.5%, respectively. In the G-CSF group, the ORR was 76.4% compared to 60.0% in the non-G-CSF group ( = 0.33), and the DCR was 85.4% versus 70.0%, respectively ( = 0.46). Median PFS was 8.3 months (95% CI, 6.8-9.8) in the G-CSF group and 6.8 months (95% CI, 6.2-7.5) in the non-G-CSF group ( = 0.24). Median OS was 13.8 months (95% CI, 9.6-18.1) for the G-CSF group and 10.6 months (95% CI, 7.9-13.3) for the non-G-CSF group ( = 0.47). Grade 3 ≥ adverse events were similar between groups (49.4% vs. 33.3%, respectively,  = 0.12).

CONCLUSION

G-CSF prophylaxis can be safely used in ES-SCLC patients undergoing carboplatin plus etoposide and atezolizumab regimen without significantly altering efficacy or increasing toxicity.

摘要

目的

我们旨在评估在广泛期小细胞肺癌(ES-SCLC)患者中使用卡铂+依托泊苷和阿替利珠单抗化疗免疫治疗时,使用粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)预防的疗效和安全性。

方法

这项回顾性、多中心研究纳入了接受卡铂+依托泊苷和阿替利珠单抗治疗的 ES-SCLC 患者,将其分为 G-CSF 组和非 G-CSF 组。收集人口统计学和疾病相关数据。分析了反应率、无进展生存期(PFS)、总生存期(OS)和毒性。

结果

在 119 名患者(中位年龄:63 岁)中,总缓解率(ORR)和疾病控制率(DCR)分别为 72.3%和 81.5%。在 G-CSF 组中,ORR 为 76.4%,而非 G-CSF 组为 60.0%( = 0.33),DCR 分别为 85.4%和 70.0%( = 0.46)。G-CSF 组的中位 PFS 为 8.3 个月(95%CI,6.8-9.8),而非 G-CSF 组为 6.8 个月(95%CI,6.2-7.5)( = 0.24)。G-CSF 组的中位 OS 为 13.8 个月(95%CI,9.6-18.1),而非 G-CSF 组为 10.6 个月(95%CI,7.9-13.3)( = 0.47)。两组的 3 级及以上不良事件发生率相似(分别为 49.4%和 33.3%,  = 0.12)。

结论

在接受卡铂+依托泊苷和阿替利珠单抗方案治疗的 ES-SCLC 患者中,使用 G-CSF 预防不会显著改变疗效或增加毒性,是安全的。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验