Reinhardt Lydia, Strasser Cristin, Steeb Theresa, Petzold Anne, Heppt Markus V, Wessely Anja, Berking Carola, Meier Friedegund
Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Skin Cancer Center at the National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT/UCC), Dresden, Germany.
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 8;19(8):e0308508. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308508. eCollection 2024.
In Germany, skin cancer screening (SCS) is available free of charge every two years to all those with statutory health insurance over the age of 35. General Practitioners (GP) can carry out the screening if they have completed an 8-hour training course. GPs play a crucial role in the implementation of SCS and act as gatekeepers between initial patient contact and referral to dermatologists.
To record how comprehensively GPs carry out SCS in terms of patient information and body examination, as well as to explore GPs opinions on the feasibility of SCS.
A cross-sectional survey was conducted. A questionnaire was sent to GPs with permission to perform SCS in two regions of Germany (Bavaria and Saxony) between August and September 2021. Data were analyzed using descriptive analysis. Subgroup analysis was performed according to regions (federal state, location of physician´s office), professional experience (experience in years, number of monthly screenings, age) and gender. Open questions were evaluated using qualitative content analysis.
In the survey, 204 GPs responded. Genitalia (40.7%, 83/203), anal fold (62.3%, 127/204) and oral mucosa (66.7%, 136/204) were the least examined body regions during screening. Information on risks (false-positive findings: 18.6%, 38/203; false-negative findings: 13.2%, 27/203; overdiagnosis: 7.8%, 16/203) and benefits (48.0%, 98/202) were not always provided. GPs who performed screenings more frequently were more likely to provide information about the benefits of SCS (p<0.001; >10 vs. <5 screenings per month). Opinions were provided on uncertainties, knowledge requirements, structural and organizational requirements of SCS, SCS training and evaluation. The organization and remuneration of the SCS programme was seen as a barrier to implementation. GPs expressed uncertainties especially in unclear findings and in dermatoscopy.
Uncertainties in the implementation of the SCS should be addressed by offering refresher courses. Good networking between GPs and dermatologists is essential to improve SCS quality.
在德国,所有35岁以上参加法定医疗保险的人每两年可免费进行一次皮肤癌筛查(SCS)。全科医生(GP)如果完成了8小时的培训课程,就可以开展这项筛查。全科医生在皮肤癌筛查的实施过程中起着关键作用,并且在患者首次接触与转诊至皮肤科医生之间充当把关人。
记录全科医生在患者信息和身体检查方面对皮肤癌筛查的执行情况,并探讨全科医生对皮肤癌筛查可行性的看法。
进行了一项横断面调查。2021年8月至9月期间,向德国两个地区(巴伐利亚州和萨克森州)获得开展皮肤癌筛查许可的全科医生发送了一份问卷。使用描述性分析对数据进行分析。根据地区(联邦州、医生办公室地点)、专业经验(年限、每月筛查次数、年龄)和性别进行亚组分析。使用定性内容分析法对开放式问题进行评估。
在此次调查中,204名全科医生做出了回应。筛查期间,生殖器(40.7%,83/203)、肛门皱襞(62.3%,127/204)和口腔黏膜(66.7%,136/204)是检查最少的身体部位。关于风险(假阳性结果:18.6%,38/203;假阴性结果:13.2%,27/203;过度诊断:7.8%,16/203)和益处(48.0%,98/202)的信息并非总是提供。筛查频率较高的全科医生更有可能提供皮肤癌筛查益处的信息(p<0.001;每月>10次筛查与每月<5次筛查相比)。针对皮肤癌筛查的不确定性、知识要求、结构和组织要求、皮肤癌筛查培训及评估发表了意见。皮肤癌筛查项目的组织和报酬被视为实施的障碍。全科医生尤其在检查结果不明确和皮肤镜检查方面表示存在不确定性。
应通过提供进修课程来解决皮肤癌筛查实施过程中的不确定性。全科医生与皮肤科医生之间良好的联络对于提高皮肤癌筛查质量至关重要。