Hastings Cent Rep. 2024 Jul;54(4):12-13. doi: 10.1002/hast.4904.
Catholic health care is often viewed as antithetical to secular conceptions of autonomy. This view can engender calls to protect "choice" in Catholic facilities. However, this view is built on a fundamental misunderstanding of the Ethical and Religious Directives for Catholic Health Care Services (ERDs). This commentary, which responds to "Principled Conscientious Provision: Referral Symmetry and Its Implications for Protecting Secular Conscience," by Abram Brummett et al., seeks to demonstrate the nuance of the ERDs as well as to address some of the challenges various Catholic identities have when interpreting and living out the ERDs so that all patients receive high-quality, compassionate care. By highlighting the Church's desire to protect all people at every stage, I hope to dispel the caricatures that often result from misunderstandings by Catholics and non-Catholics alike.
天主教学术医疗通常被视为与世俗的自主观念背道而驰。这种观点可能会引发在天主教学术医疗设施中保护“选择”的呼声。然而,这种观点建立在对《天主教健康服务伦理与宗教指令》(ERDs)的根本性误解之上。本评论是对 Abram Brummett 等人的“有原则的自觉提供:转诊对称及其对保护世俗良心的影响”的回应,旨在展示 ERDs 的细微差别,并解决各种天主教身份在解释和实践 ERDs 时所面临的一些挑战,以便所有患者都能获得高质量、富有同情心的护理。通过强调教会在各个阶段保护所有人的愿望,我希望消除天主教徒和非天主教徒之间经常因误解而产生的漫画形象。