Suppr超能文献

肺部沉默:从肺功能测试和计算机断层扫描比较慢通气和非通气肺单位的指标。

Silence of the lungs: comparing measures of slow and noncommunicating lung units from pulmonary function tests with computed tomography.

机构信息

National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.

Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals, Guys and St Thomas' Trust, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Appl Physiol (1985). 2024 Oct 1;137(4):883-891. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00340.2024. Epub 2024 Aug 8.

Abstract

Multiple breath washout (MBW) has successfully assessed the silent lung zone particularly in cystic fibrosis lung disease, however, it is limited to the communicating lung only. There are a number of different pulmonary function methods that can assess what is commonly referred to as trapped air, with varying approaches and sensitivity. Twenty-five people with cystic fibrosis (pwCF) underwent MBW, spirometry, body plethysmography, and spirometry-controlled computed tomography (spiro-CT) on the same day. PwCF also performed extensions to MBW that evaluate air trapping, including our novel extension (MBW), which reveals the extent of underventilated lung units (UVLU). In addition, we used two previously established 5-breath methods that provide a volume of trapped gas (VTG). We used trapped air % from spiro-CT as the gold standard for comparison. UVLU derived from MBW showed the best agreement with trapped air %, both in terms of correlation ( 0.89, < 0.0001) and sensitivity (79%). Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated a significant underestimation of the VTG by both 5-breath methods (-249 mL [95% CI -10,796; 580 mL] and -203 mL [95% CI -997; 591 mL], respectively). Parameters from both spirometry and body plethysmography were suboptimal at assessing this pathophysiology. The parameters from MBW demonstrated the best relationship with spiro-CT and had the best sensitivity compared with the other pulmonary function methods assessed in this study. MBW shows promise to assess and monitor this critical pathophysiological feature, which has been shown to be a driver of lung disease progression in pwCF. We consider the term "trapped air" either in the use of imaging or pulmonary function testing, something of a misnomer that can lead to an inaccurate assessment of an important physiological feature. Instead, we propose the term underventilated lung units (UVLU). Of the many pulmonary function methods we used in this study, we found that the use of multiple breath washout with short extension (MBW) to be the best nonimaging method.

摘要

多次呼吸冲洗(MBW)已成功评估了沉默肺区,特别是在囊性纤维化肺病中,然而,它仅限于连通肺。有许多不同的肺功能方法可以评估通常称为被困空气的情况,这些方法的方法和灵敏度各不相同。25 名囊性纤维化(pwCF)患者在同一天接受了 MBW、肺活量测定法、体描法和肺活量控制计算机断层扫描(spiro-CT)检查。pwCF 还进行了 MBW 的扩展,以评估空气滞留,包括我们的新型扩展(MBW),该扩展揭示了通气不足的肺单位(UVLU)的程度。此外,我们使用了两种以前建立的 5 次呼吸方法,这些方法提供了被困气体的体积(VTG)。我们使用 spiro-CT 中捕获的空气%作为比较的金标准。MBW 衍生的 UVLU 在与捕获空气%的相关性(0.89,<0.0001)和敏感性(79%)方面均显示出与捕获空气%最佳的一致性。Bland-Altman 分析表明,两种 5 次呼吸方法均低估了 VTG(分别为-249 mL [95% CI -10,796;580 mL]和-203 mL [95% CI -997;591 mL])。肺活量测定法和体描法的参数在评估这种病理生理学方面均不理想。MBW 的参数与 spiro-CT 具有最佳关系,并且与本研究中评估的其他肺功能方法相比,具有最佳的敏感性。MBW 有望评估和监测这种关键的病理生理特征,已证明这是 pwCF 中肺部疾病进展的驱动因素。我们认为“被困空气”一词无论是在影像学还是肺功能测试中使用,都有些用词不当,可能导致对重要生理特征的不准确评估。相反,我们提出了“通气不足的肺单位(UVLU)”一词。在本研究中我们使用的许多肺功能方法中,我们发现使用短扩展的多次呼吸冲洗(MBW)是最好的非成像方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/798f/11486470/8c7ca5d04d53/jappl-00340-2024r01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验