Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Goa Dental College and Hospital Bambolim, Goa, India.
Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2024 Dec;28(4):1587-1594. doi: 10.1007/s10006-024-01287-2. Epub 2024 Aug 9.
This study aims to compare the outcomes of suture-less and multiple suture closure methods on postoperative pain, swelling, and trismus, and associated complications.
This prospective, randomized clinical trial was conducted at the Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Goa Dental College & Hospital. Inclusion criteria encompassed subjects aged between 17 and 55 years, classified as American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) I, with asymptomatic impacted third molars falling within the moderately difficult impaction range (Pederson's difficulty index: 5-7). Study excluded individuals classified as ASA II, III, or IV, those with known or suspected allergies to the anaesthetic solution, immunocompromised patients, and individuals taking medications that could affect healing. Pregnant or lactating females and those with a history of bleeding disorders were also excluded. Wound closure methods were compared: Group A underwent primary closure with silk sutures, while Group B had suture-less closure. Subjects were allocated to the specific groups using a simple randomization method. This involved using a lottery-based random sequence to assign each participant to either Group A or Group B. Pain intensity, facial swelling, and trismus were key outcomes. Secondary outcomes included lingual nerve sensation and postoperative complications. Demographics factors, surgical details, radiographic and perioperative data, and physiological parameters were considered. Non-parametric tests and parametric test (repeated measure ANOVA) were employed. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.
Among 101 participants, both closure techniques exhibited similar outcomes in pain, swelling, and lingual nerve function. However, suture-less closure resulted in significantly less trismus and fewer cases of delayed wound healing.
Suture-less method after surgical removal of third molar may reduce trismus compared to multiple sutures. While pain, swelling, and lingual nerve function management were comparable.
本研究旨在比较无缝线和多缝线闭合方法在术后疼痛、肿胀和牙关紧闭以及相关并发症方面的效果。
本前瞻性、随机临床试验在果阿牙科医学院口腔颌面外科进行。纳入标准包括年龄在 17 至 55 岁之间、美国麻醉医师学会(ASA)分级为 I 级、无症状的阻生第三磨牙处于中度困难阻生范围(佩德森难度指数:5-7)的患者。研究排除了 ASA 分级为 II、III 或 IV 级、对麻醉溶液已知或疑似过敏、免疫功能低下的患者以及正在服用可能影响愈合的药物的患者。妊娠或哺乳期妇女以及有出血性疾病史的患者也被排除在外。
A 组采用丝线缝合进行一期闭合,B 组采用无缝线闭合。使用简单随机化方法将受试者分配到特定的组中。这涉及使用基于彩票的随机序列将每个参与者分配到 A 组或 B 组。疼痛强度、面部肿胀和牙关紧闭是主要结局。次要结局包括舌神经感觉和术后并发症。考虑了人口统计学因素、手术细节、影像学和围手术期数据以及生理参数。采用非参数检验和参数检验(重复测量方差分析)。统计学意义设定为 P<0.05。
在 101 名参与者中,两种闭合技术在疼痛、肿胀和舌神经功能方面表现出相似的结果。然而,无缝线闭合导致的牙关紧闭程度明显较轻,且愈合延迟的病例较少。
与多缝线相比,第三磨牙手术后采用无缝线方法可能会减少牙关紧闭。虽然疼痛、肿胀和舌神经功能管理相当。