Service de Chirurgie Orale, Department of Oral Surgery, CHU Nîmes, CHRU de Nîmes - Hôpital Universitaire Carémeau, University of Montpellier, Place du Professeur Debré, 30029, Nîmes Cedex 9, France.
Pôle de Chirurgie Orale, 320 rue René Cassin, 84000, Avignon, France.
BMC Oral Health. 2022 Jun 26;22(1):256. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02287-y.
Although wisdom-tooth extraction is a routine intervention, the postoperative period remains marked by local inflammation classically manifesting as pain, edema and trismus. Furthermore, there is no consensus on the best operative techniques, particularly for the mucosal closure stage on impacted mandibular wisdom teeth.
This parallel, randomized, non-blinded study compared pain following removal of impacted third molars, with and without sutures. Patients were electronically allocated 1:1 to extraction with versus without sutures. Patients ≥ 14 years' old scheduled for extraction of four impacted wisdom teeth under general anesthesia at three French hospitals were eligible for inclusion. Exclusion criteria included taking antiplatelet agents or anticoagulants, coagulation disorders or immunosuppression, and planned orofacial surgical procedures or emergency pain/infection. The primary objective was pain evaluated by Visual Analogue Scale on Day 3. Secondary outcomes were edema, trismus, healing, complications, painkiller consumption and quality of life on Day 3 and 31.
Between June 2016 and November 2018, 100 patients were randomized. Finally, 44 patients in the Suture group and 50 patients in the Without Suture group were analyzed. Mean age was 16.5 years and 66.6% of patients were female. After adjustment on center, age and smoking, no statistical difference was seen between groups for pain on Day 3 (p = 0.904). No differences were seen for swelling, trismus, consumption of painkillers, healing, complications or quality of life. Smokers had a 3.65 times higher complications rate (p = 0.0244).
Sutureless removal of third molars is thus a reliable technique without negative consequence on outcomes, and allows shorter operating time. Smoking is a risk factor for postoperative complications. Trial registration www.
gov (NCT02583997), registered 22/10/2015.
尽管智齿拔除是一种常规干预措施,但术后仍会出现局部炎症,表现为疼痛、肿胀和牙关紧闭。此外,对于下颌阻生智齿的黏膜闭合阶段,目前尚无最佳手术技术的共识。
本项平行、随机、非盲法研究比较了有缝合与无缝合的情况下,拔除阻生第三磨牙后的疼痛情况。患者通过电子分配以 1:1 的比例分为缝合组和无缝合组。年龄≥14 岁、在法国三家医院全身麻醉下接受四颗阻生智齿拔除的患者符合纳入标准。排除标准包括服用抗血小板药物或抗凝剂、凝血障碍或免疫抑制,以及计划进行口腔颌面外科手术或紧急疼痛/感染。主要观察指标为第 3 天的视觉模拟评分(VAS)评估疼痛。次要观察指标为第 3 天和第 31 天的肿胀、牙关紧闭、愈合、并发症、止痛药使用和生活质量。
2016 年 6 月至 2018 年 11 月期间,共纳入 100 名患者,最终有 44 名患者被分配至缝合组,50 名患者被分配至无缝合组。平均年龄为 16.5 岁,66.6%的患者为女性。调整中心、年龄和吸烟因素后,两组患者第 3 天的疼痛无统计学差异(p=0.904)。两组患者在肿胀、牙关紧闭、止痛药使用、愈合、并发症和生活质量方面均无差异。吸烟者的并发症发生率高 3.65 倍(p=0.0244)。
因此,无缝合的第三磨牙拔除是一种可靠的技术,不会对结果产生负面影响,且可缩短手术时间。吸烟是术后并发症的危险因素。
www.。
NCT02583997,于 2015 年 10 月 22 日注册。