Suppr超能文献

拔除第三磨牙后无缝合式窝洞技术:一项多中心、开放、随机对照试验。

Sutureless socket technique after removal of third molars: a multicentric, open, randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Service de Chirurgie Orale, Department of Oral Surgery, CHU Nîmes, CHRU de Nîmes - Hôpital Universitaire Carémeau, University of Montpellier, Place du Professeur Debré, 30029, Nîmes Cedex 9, France.

Pôle de Chirurgie Orale, 320 rue René Cassin, 84000, Avignon, France.

出版信息

BMC Oral Health. 2022 Jun 26;22(1):256. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02287-y.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although wisdom-tooth extraction is a routine intervention, the postoperative period remains marked by local inflammation classically manifesting as pain, edema and trismus. Furthermore, there is no consensus on the best operative techniques, particularly for the mucosal closure stage on impacted mandibular wisdom teeth.

METHODS

This parallel, randomized, non-blinded study compared pain following removal of impacted third molars, with and without sutures. Patients were electronically allocated 1:1 to extraction with versus without sutures. Patients ≥ 14 years' old scheduled for extraction of four impacted wisdom teeth under general anesthesia at three French hospitals were eligible for inclusion. Exclusion criteria included taking antiplatelet agents or anticoagulants, coagulation disorders or immunosuppression, and planned orofacial surgical procedures or emergency pain/infection. The primary objective was pain evaluated by Visual Analogue Scale on Day 3. Secondary outcomes were edema, trismus, healing, complications, painkiller consumption and quality of life on Day 3 and 31.

RESULTS

Between June 2016 and November 2018, 100 patients were randomized. Finally, 44 patients in the Suture group and 50 patients in the Without Suture group were analyzed. Mean age was 16.5 years and 66.6% of patients were female. After adjustment on center, age and smoking, no statistical difference was seen between groups for pain on Day 3 (p = 0.904). No differences were seen for swelling, trismus, consumption of painkillers, healing, complications or quality of life. Smokers had a 3.65 times higher complications rate (p = 0.0244).

CONCLUSIONS

Sutureless removal of third molars is thus a reliable technique without negative consequence on outcomes, and allows shorter operating time. Smoking is a risk factor for postoperative complications. Trial registration www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov (NCT02583997), registered 22/10/2015.

摘要

背景

尽管智齿拔除是一种常规干预措施,但术后仍会出现局部炎症,表现为疼痛、肿胀和牙关紧闭。此外,对于下颌阻生智齿的黏膜闭合阶段,目前尚无最佳手术技术的共识。

方法

本项平行、随机、非盲法研究比较了有缝合与无缝合的情况下,拔除阻生第三磨牙后的疼痛情况。患者通过电子分配以 1:1 的比例分为缝合组和无缝合组。年龄≥14 岁、在法国三家医院全身麻醉下接受四颗阻生智齿拔除的患者符合纳入标准。排除标准包括服用抗血小板药物或抗凝剂、凝血障碍或免疫抑制,以及计划进行口腔颌面外科手术或紧急疼痛/感染。主要观察指标为第 3 天的视觉模拟评分(VAS)评估疼痛。次要观察指标为第 3 天和第 31 天的肿胀、牙关紧闭、愈合、并发症、止痛药使用和生活质量。

结果

2016 年 6 月至 2018 年 11 月期间,共纳入 100 名患者,最终有 44 名患者被分配至缝合组,50 名患者被分配至无缝合组。平均年龄为 16.5 岁,66.6%的患者为女性。调整中心、年龄和吸烟因素后,两组患者第 3 天的疼痛无统计学差异(p=0.904)。两组患者在肿胀、牙关紧闭、止痛药使用、愈合、并发症和生活质量方面均无差异。吸烟者的并发症发生率高 3.65 倍(p=0.0244)。

结论

因此,无缝合的第三磨牙拔除是一种可靠的技术,不会对结果产生负面影响,且可缩短手术时间。吸烟是术后并发症的危险因素。

试验注册

www.。

临床试验

NCT02583997,于 2015 年 10 月 22 日注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8c7/9233809/1a94dc34702b/12903_2022_2287_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验