• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

影响植入前非整倍体基因检测(PGT-A)周期中生化妊娠丢失(BPL)的因素:机器学习辅助识别

Factors affecting biochemical pregnancy loss (BPL) in preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) cycles: machine learning-assisted identification.

作者信息

Ortiz José A, Lledó B, Morales R, Máñez-Grau A, Cascales A, Rodríguez-Arnedo A, Castillo Juan C, Bernabeu A, Bernabeu R

机构信息

Instituto Bernabeu, Molecular Biology Department, Alicante, Spain.

Instituto Bernabeu, Reproductive Biology, Alicante, Spain.

出版信息

Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2024 Aug 8;22(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s12958-024-01271-1.

DOI:10.1186/s12958-024-01271-1
PMID:39118049
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11308629/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To determine the factors influencing the likelihood of biochemical pregnancy loss (BPL) after transfer of a euploid embryo from preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) cycles.

METHODS

The study employed an observational, retrospective cohort design, encompassing 6020 embryos from 2879 PGT-A cycles conducted between February 2013 and September 2021. Trophectoderm biopsies in day 5 (D5) or day 6 (D6) blastocysts were analyzed by next generation sequencing (NGS). Only single embryo transfers (SET) were considered, totaling 1161 transfers. Of these, 49.9% resulted in positive pregnancy tests, with 18.3% experiencing BPL. To establish a predictive model for BPL, both classical statistical methods and five different supervised classification machine learning algorithms were used. A total of forty-seven factors were incorporated as predictor variables in the machine learning models.

RESULTS

Throughout the optimization process for each model, various performance metrics were computed. Random Forest model emerged as the best model, boasting the highest area under the ROC curve (AUC) value of 0.913, alongside an accuracy of 0.830, positive predictive value of 0.857, and negative predictive value of 0.807. For the selected model, SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) values were determined for each of the variables to establish which had the best predictive ability. Notably, variables pertaining to embryo biopsy demonstrated the greatest predictive capacity, followed by factors associated with ovarian stimulation (COS), maternal age, and paternal age.

CONCLUSIONS

The Random Forest model had a higher predictive power for identifying BPL occurrences in PGT-A cycles. Specifically, variables associated with the embryo biopsy procedure (biopsy day, number of biopsied embryos, and number of biopsied cells) and ovarian stimulation (number of oocytes retrieved and duration of stimulation), exhibited the strongest predictive power.

摘要

目的

确定影响非整倍体植入前基因检测(PGT-A)周期中整倍体胚胎移植后生化妊娠丢失(BPL)可能性的因素。

方法

本研究采用观察性回顾性队列设计,纳入了2013年2月至2021年9月期间进行的2879个PGT-A周期中的6020个胚胎。对第5天(D5)或第6天(D6)囊胚的滋养外胚层活检样本进行二代测序(NGS)分析。仅考虑单胚胎移植(SET),共计1161次移植。其中,49.9%的妊娠试验呈阳性,18.3%发生了BPL。为建立BPL的预测模型,使用了经典统计方法和五种不同的监督分类机器学习算法。共有47个因素作为预测变量纳入机器学习模型。

结果

在每个模型的优化过程中,计算了各种性能指标。随机森林模型成为最佳模型,其ROC曲线下面积(AUC)值最高,为0.913,准确率为0.830,阳性预测值为0.857,阴性预测值为0.807。对于所选模型,确定了每个变量的SHAP(SHapley加性解释)值,以确定哪些变量具有最佳预测能力。值得注意的是,与胚胎活检相关的变量显示出最大的预测能力,其次是与卵巢刺激(COS)、母亲年龄和父亲年龄相关的因素。

结论

随机森林模型在识别PGT-A周期中BPL发生情况方面具有更高的预测能力。具体而言,与胚胎活检程序(活检日、活检胚胎数量和活检细胞数量)和卵巢刺激(获卵数和刺激持续时间)相关的变量表现出最强的预测能力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50f2/11308629/bf8426333549/12958_2024_1271_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50f2/11308629/5f35e36bcc6a/12958_2024_1271_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50f2/11308629/bf8426333549/12958_2024_1271_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50f2/11308629/5f35e36bcc6a/12958_2024_1271_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50f2/11308629/bf8426333549/12958_2024_1271_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Factors affecting biochemical pregnancy loss (BPL) in preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) cycles: machine learning-assisted identification.影响植入前非整倍体基因检测(PGT-A)周期中生化妊娠丢失(BPL)的因素:机器学习辅助识别
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2024 Aug 8;22(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s12958-024-01271-1.
2
Multi-omics PGT: re-evaluation of euploid blastocysts for implantation potential based on RNA sequencing.多组学植入前基因检测:基于RNA测序对整倍体囊胚的着床潜力进行重新评估。
Hum Reprod. 2024 Dec 1;39(12):2861-2872. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deae237.
3
Minimizing mosaicism: assessing the impact of fertilization method on rate of mosaicism after next-generation sequencing (NGS) preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A).最大限度地减少嵌合体:评估胚胎植入前遗传学检测(PGT-A)中下一代测序(NGS)后不同受精方法对嵌合体发生率的影响。
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019 Jan;36(1):153-157. doi: 10.1007/s10815-018-1347-6. Epub 2018 Oct 25.
4
Development of an artificial intelligence model for predicting the likelihood of human embryo euploidy based on blastocyst images from multiple imaging systems during IVF.基于体外受精过程中多个成像系统的囊胚图像,开发一种人工智能模型,用于预测人类胚胎整倍体的可能性。
Hum Reprod. 2022 Jul 30;37(8):1746-1759. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deac131.
5
Opening the black box: why do euploid blastocysts fail to implant? A systematic review and meta-analysis.打开黑匣子:整倍体囊胚为何着床失败?一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Hum Reprod Update. 2023 Sep 5;29(5):570-633. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmad010.
6
The use of copy number loads to designate mosaicism in blastocyst stage PGT-A cycles: fewer is better.在囊胚期植入前基因检测-非整倍体(PGT-A)周期中使用拷贝数负荷来确定嵌合现象:越少越好。
Hum Reprod. 2023 May 2;38(5):982-991. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dead049.
7
Implicit bias in diagnosing mosaicism amongst preimplantation genetic testing providers: results from a multicenter study of 36 395 blastocysts.胚胎植入前遗传学检测提供者在诊断嵌合体时的内隐偏倚:一项 36395 个囊胚的多中心研究结果。
Hum Reprod. 2024 Jan 5;39(1):258-274. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dead213.
8
Predicting risk of blastocyst aneuploidy among women with previous aneuploid pregnancy loss: a multicenter-data-based multivariable model.预测有既往非整倍体妊娠丢失史女性的囊胚非整倍体风险:一项基于多中心数据的多变量模型。
Hum Reprod. 2023 Dec 4;38(12):2382-2390. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dead202.
9
Comparison of clinical outcome between day 5 and day 6 single blastocyst transfers in cycles undergoing preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy.在接受非整倍体植入前基因检测的周期中,第5天和第6天单囊胚移植的临床结局比较。
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2023 May;62(3):429-433. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2023.03.005.
10
Leave the past behind: women's reproductive history shows no association with blastocysts' euploidy and limited association with live birth rates after euploid embryo transfers.放下过去:女性的生殖史与囊胚的整倍体率无关,与整倍体胚胎移植后的活产率关联有限。
Hum Reprod. 2021 Mar 18;36(4):929-940. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deab014.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical Significance of Biochemical Pregnancy Loss in Recurrent Pregnancy Loss Patients: Insights From Euploid Embryo Transfers Minimizing Embryonic Bias.复发性流产患者生化妊娠丢失的临床意义:来自整倍体胚胎移植的见解,最小化胚胎偏倚
Reprod Med Biol. 2025 Jul 23;24(1):e12668. doi: 10.1002/rmb2.12668. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning: An Updated Systematic Review of Their Role in Obstetrics and Midwifery.人工智能与机器学习:对其在产科和助产领域作用的最新系统综述
Cureus. 2025 Mar 11;17(3):e80394. doi: 10.7759/cureus.80394. eCollection 2025 Mar.

本文引用的文献

1
Is biochemical pregnancy loss associated with embryo or endometrium? A retrospective cohort study in frozen single embryo transfer of own and donated oocytes.生化妊娠丢失与胚胎还是子宫内膜有关?一项关于自体和捐赠卵母细胞冷冻单胚胎移植的回顾性队列研究。
Hum Reprod. 2024 May 22. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deae106.
2
Antibiotic cured chronic endometritis remains a risk factor for early pregnancy loss in the subsequent frozen euploid embryo transfer.抗生素治愈的慢性子宫内膜炎仍是随后冷冻整倍体胚胎移植中早期妊娠丢失的一个危险因素。
Reprod Biomed Online. 2024 Feb;48(2):103611. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2023.103611. Epub 2023 Oct 13.
3
Preconception Non-criteria Antiphospholipid Antibodies and Risk of Subsequent Early Pregnancy Loss: a Retrospective Study.
抗磷脂抗体非标准预存与后续早期妊娠丢失风险:一项回顾性研究。
Reprod Sci. 2024 Mar;31(3):746-753. doi: 10.1007/s43032-023-01388-5. Epub 2023 Nov 6.
4
A non-invasive artificial intelligence approach for the prediction of human blastocyst ploidy: a retrospective model development and validation study.一种用于预测人类囊胚倍性的非侵入性人工智能方法:回顾性模型开发和验证研究。
Lancet Digit Health. 2023 Jan;5(1):e28-e40. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(22)00213-8.
5
Application of machine learning to predict aneuploidy and mosaicism in embryos from in vitro fertilization cycles.机器学习在预测体外受精周期胚胎非整倍体和嵌合体中的应用。
AJOG Glob Rep. 2022 Sep 19;2(4):100103. doi: 10.1016/j.xagr.2022.100103. eCollection 2022 Nov.
6
Machine learning models for identifying predictors of clinical outcomes with first-line immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.机器学习模型用于识别一线免疫检查点抑制剂治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的临床结局预测因素。
Sci Rep. 2022 Oct 21;12(1):17670. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-20061-6.
7
Embryo classification beyond pregnancy: early prediction of first trimester miscarriage using machine learning.胚胎分类超越妊娠:使用机器学习早期预测早期流产。
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2023 Feb;40(2):309-322. doi: 10.1007/s10815-022-02619-5. Epub 2022 Oct 4.
8
Combining Machine Learning with Metabolomic and Embryologic Data Improves Embryo Implantation Prediction.将机器学习与代谢组学和胚胎学数据相结合可提高胚胎着床预测。
Reprod Sci. 2023 Mar;30(3):984-994. doi: 10.1007/s43032-022-01071-1. Epub 2022 Sep 12.
9
Supporting first FSH dosage for ovarian stimulation with machine learning.基于机器学习的卵巢刺激中首次 FSH 剂量的支持。
Reprod Biomed Online. 2022 Nov;45(5):1039-1045. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2022.06.010. Epub 2022 Jun 18.
10
Development of an artificial intelligence model for predicting the likelihood of human embryo euploidy based on blastocyst images from multiple imaging systems during IVF.基于体外受精过程中多个成像系统的囊胚图像,开发一种人工智能模型,用于预测人类胚胎整倍体的可能性。
Hum Reprod. 2022 Jul 30;37(8):1746-1759. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deac131.