Cochlear Implantation Outcomes in Patients With Sporadic Inner Ear Schwannomas With and Without Simultaneous Tumor Resection.

OBJECTIVES

Describe a single institution's cochlear implant outcomes for patients with inner ear schwannomas (IES) in the setting of various tumor management strategies (observation, surgical resection, or stereotactic radiosurgery [SRS]).

STUDY DESIGN

Single-institution retrospective review.

PATIENTS

Patients diagnosed with isolated, sporadic IES who underwent cochlear implantation (CI).

INTERVENTIONS

CI with or without IES treatment.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Speech perception outcomes, tumor status.

RESULTS

Twelve patients with IES underwent CI with a median audiologic and radiologic follow-up of 12 months. Six patients underwent complete resection of the tumor at the time of CI, four underwent tumor observation, and two underwent SRS before CI. At 1 year after CI for all patients, the median consonant-nucleus-consonant (CNC) word score was 55% (interquartile range, 44-73%), and the median AzBio sentence in quiet score was 77% (interquartile range, 68-93%). Overall, those with surgical resection performed similarly to those with tumor observation (CNC 58 versus 61%; AzBio in quiet 74 versus 91%, respectively). Patients who underwent tumor resection before implantation had a wider range of speech performance outcomes compared with patients who underwent tumor observation. Two patients had SRS treatment before CI (10 months previous and same-day as CI) with CNC word scores of 6 and 40%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with IES who underwent CI demonstrated similar speech performance outcomes (CNC 56% and AzBio 82%), when compared with the general cochlear implant population. Patients who underwent either tumor observation or surgical resection performed well after CI.