Hailu Seyoum, Abbabu Shimelis, Seifu Ashenafi, Gorde Naol, Besha Aschalew
Department of Anesthesia, Dilla University, Dilla.
School of Medicine, Dilla University, Dilla.
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2024 Apr 29;86(8):4495-4504. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000002094. eCollection 2024 Aug.
Abdominal surgery stands as one of the most frequently conducted procedures across surgical specialties, accounting for up to half of surgery-related expenses. Hemodynamic instability emerges as a significant concern during anaesthesia and surgery, provoked by the stress of intubation, surgical incision, and anaesthetic agents. Following abdominal surgery, pain is an inevitable consequence, typically managed with opioid-based analgesia. However, the adverse effects associated with opioids often overshadow their analgesic benefits, particularly in the context of abdominal surgery. Consequently, there exists a necessity to explore and assess alternative non-opioid pain management options post-abdominal surgery as part of a broader strategy to reduce opioid usage. The primary aim of this investigation is to assess the effectiveness of varying doses of dexmedetomidine in regulating intraoperative hemodynamics and alleviating postoperative pain in patients undergoing abdominal surgery.
Ethical clearance and institutional review board were obtained from the ethical clearance committee of Dilla University College of Medicine and Health Sciences with protocol unique number of duirb/008/22-01. Our trial has been prospectively registered on the Pan African Clinical Trial Registry with a unique identification number for the registry PACTR202208813896934. Statistical package and analysis were performed by using SPSS version 25. The distribution of data was checked by using Shapiro-Wilk test and the homogeneity of variance was checked by Levene's test. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Kruskal-Wallis H test were used for normally distributed continuous data and non-normally distributed or non-parametric data, respectively. value less than 0.05 with a power of 90% was considered statistically significant.
There was a statistically significant increase in mean SBP in the control group at the different critical time points (<0.05), as compared to the baseline value, while there was no significant difference in mean systolic blood pressure (SBP) between the baseline and all other levels for group 2 and group 3. A statistically significant increase in mean arterial pressure (MAP) was detected in the control group at immediately after intubation (=0.009) as compared to the baseline value, while a statistically significant reduction in mean heart rate (HR) was observed in group 3 at 15th min after infusion and at 30th 30 min after induction compared to baseline with a value of 0.002 and 0.008, respectively.Conclusion:Perioperative low-dose infusion of dexmedetomidine at the rate of 0.4 mcg/kg/h is a useful anaesthesia adjuvant to control hemodynamic stress response to critical periods. It is wise to use this infusion dose as part of general anaesthesia to achieve better hemodynamic stability.
腹部手术是外科各专业中最常开展的手术之一,占手术相关费用的一半。血流动力学不稳定是麻醉和手术期间的一个重大问题,由插管、手术切口和麻醉剂的应激引起。腹部手术后,疼痛是不可避免的后果,通常采用阿片类镇痛药物进行治疗。然而,与阿片类药物相关的不良反应往往掩盖了它们的镇痛效果,特别是在腹部手术的情况下。因此,有必要探索和评估腹部手术后替代非阿片类疼痛管理方案,作为减少阿片类药物使用的更广泛战略的一部分。本研究的主要目的是评估不同剂量右美托咪定对腹部手术患者术中血流动力学调节和术后疼痛缓解的有效性。
获得了迪拉大学医学院和健康科学学院伦理审查委员会的伦理批准和机构审查委员会批准,方案唯一编号为duirb/008/22 - 01。我们的试验已在泛非临床试验注册中心进行前瞻性注册,注册号为PACTR202208813896934。使用SPSS 25版进行统计软件包和分析。使用Shapiro-Wilk检验检查数据分布,使用Levene检验检查方差齐性。方差分析(ANOVA)和Kruskal-Wallis H检验分别用于正态分布的连续数据和非正态分布或非参数数据。P值小于0.05且检验效能为90%被认为具有统计学意义。
与基线值相比,对照组在不同关键时间点的平均收缩压(SBP)有统计学显著升高(P<0.05),而第2组和第3组的基线值与所有其他水平之间的平均收缩压(SBP)无显著差异。与基线值相比,对照组在插管后即刻的平均动脉压(MAP)有统计学显著升高(P = 0.009),而第3组在输注后15分钟和诱导后30分钟的平均心率(HR)与基线相比有统计学显著降低,P值分别为0.002和0.008。
围手术期以0.4微克/千克/小时的速率低剂量输注右美托咪定是一种有用的麻醉辅助药物,可控制对关键时期的血流动力学应激反应。将此输注剂量作为全身麻醉的一部分使用以实现更好的血流动力学稳定性是明智的。