Akinyemi Oluwasegun A, Awolumate Oluwatayo, Fasokun Mojisola E, Odusanya Eunice, Lasisi Oluwatobi, Ugwendum Derek, Weldeslase Terhas Asfiha, Babalola Oluranti O, Belie Funmilola M, Micheal Miriam
Health Policy and Management, University of Maryland School of Public Health, College Park, USA.
Surgery, Howard University College of Medicine, Washington, D.C., USA.
Cureus. 2024 Jul 9;16(7):e64139. doi: 10.7759/cureus.64139. eCollection 2024 Jul.
Introduction Gastric cancer, a significant public health concern, remains one of the most challenging malignancies to treat effectively. In the United States, survival rates for gastric cancer have historically been low, partly due to late-stage diagnosis and disparities in access to care. The Affordable Care Act (ACA) sought to address such disparities by expanding healthcare coverage and improving access to preventive and early treatment services. Objective This study aims to determine the causal effects of the ACA's implementation on gastric cancer survival rates, focusing on a comparative analysis between two distinct U.S. states: New Jersey, which fully embraced ACA provisions, and Georgia, which has not adopted the policy, as of 2023. Methods In this retrospective analysis, we utilized data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER) registry to assess the impact of the ACA on cancer-specific survival (CSS) among gastric cancer patients. The study spanned the period from 2000 to 2020, divided into pre-ACA (2000-2013) and post-ACA (2016-2020) periods, with a two-year washout (2013-2015). We compared Georgia (a non-expansion state) to New Jersey (an expansion state since 2014) using a Difference-in-Differences (DiD) approach. We adjusted for patient demographics, income, metropolitan status, disease stage, and treatment modalities. Results Among 25,061 patients, 58.7% were in New Jersey (14,711), while 41.3% were in Georgia (10,350). The pre-ACA period included 18,878 patients (40.0% in Georgia and 60.0% in New Jersey), and 6,183 patients were in the post-ACA period (45.2% in Georgia and 54.8% in New Jersey). The post-ACA period was associated with a 20% reduction in mortality hazard among gastric cancer patients, irrespective of the state of residence (HR = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.73-0.88). Patients who were residents of New Jersey experienced a 12% reduction in mortality hazard compared to those who resided in Georgia in the post-ACA period (HR = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.78-0.99). Other factors linked to improved survival outcomes included surgery (OR = 0.30, 95% CI: 0.28-0.34) and female gender (OR=0.83, 95% CI: 0.76-0.91). Conclusion The study underscores the ACA's potential positive impact on CSS among gastric cancer patients, emphasizing the importance of healthcare policy interventions in improving patient outcomes.
引言
胃癌是一个重大的公共卫生问题,仍然是最难有效治疗的恶性肿瘤之一。在美国,胃癌的生存率一直很低,部分原因是晚期诊断以及获得医疗服务的差异。《平价医疗法案》(ACA)试图通过扩大医疗保险覆盖范围和改善预防及早期治疗服务的可及性来解决这些差异。
目的
本研究旨在确定ACA实施对胃癌生存率的因果效应,重点是对美国两个不同州进行比较分析:截至2023年,全面接受ACA条款的新泽西州和未采用该政策的佐治亚州。
方法
在这项回顾性分析中,我们利用监测、流行病学和最终结果计划(SEER)登记处的数据,评估ACA对胃癌患者特定癌症生存率(CSS)的影响。研究涵盖2000年至2020年期间,分为ACA实施前(2000 - 2013年)和ACA实施后(2016 - 2020年)两个阶段,中间有两年的缓冲期(2013 - 2015年)。我们使用双重差分(DiD)方法将佐治亚州(一个未扩大医保覆盖的州)与新泽西州(自2014年起为扩大医保覆盖的州)进行比较。我们对患者的人口统计学特征、收入、都市状况、疾病阶段和治疗方式进行了调整。
结果
在25,061名患者中,58.7%(14,711名)在新泽西州,而41.3%(10,350名)在佐治亚州。ACA实施前阶段包括18,878名患者(佐治亚州占40.0%,新泽西州占60.0%),ACA实施后阶段有6,183名患者(佐治亚州占45.2%,新泽西州占54.8%)。ACA实施后阶段与胃癌患者死亡风险降低20%相关,无论居住在哪个州(风险比[HR]=0.80,95%置信区间[CI]:0.73 - 0.88)。与居住在佐治亚州的患者相比,居住在新泽西州的患者在ACA实施后阶段死亡风险降低了12%(HR = 0.88,95% CI:0.78 - 0.99)。与生存结果改善相关的其他因素包括手术(优势比[OR]=0.30,95% CI:0.28 - 0.34)和女性性别(OR = 0.83,95% CI:0.76 - 0.91)。
结论
该研究强调了ACA对胃癌患者CSS的潜在积极影响,强调了医疗政策干预对改善患者结局的重要性。